BBSnline
BBSPrints Archive

Archaeology and cognitive evolution


Home 

About 

Browse 

Search 

Register 

Subscriptions 

Deposit Papers 

Help


    

Wynn, Thomas (2002) Archaeology and cognitive evolution.

Full text available as:HTML

Short Abstract:

Archaeology can provide two bodies of information relevant to the understanding of the evolution of human cognition - the timing of developments, and the evolutionary context of these developments. To do this, archaeology must document attributes that have direct implications for underlying cognitive mechanisms. One example of such a cognitive archaeology is that for spatial cognition. The archaeological record documents an evolutionary sequence that begins with ape-equivalent spatial abilities 2.5 million years ago and ends with the appearance of modern abilities in the still remote past of 400,000 years ago. The timing of these developments reveals two major episodes in the evolution in spatial ability, one 1.5 million years ago and the other one million years later.

Long Abstract:

Archaeology can provide two bodies of information relevant to the understanding of the evolution of human cognition - the timing of developments, and the evolutionary context of these developments. The challenge is methodological. Archaeology must document attributes that have direct implications for underlying cognitive mechanisms. One example of such a cognitive archaeology is that for spatial cognition. The archaeological record documents an evolutionary sequence that begins with ape-equivalent spatial abilities 2.5 million years ago and ends with the appearance of modern abilities in the still remote past of 400,000 years ago. The timing of these developments reveals two major episodes in the evolution in spatial ability, one 1.5 million years ago and the other one million years later. The two episodes of development in spatial cognition had very different evolutionary contexts. The first was associated with the shift to an open country adaptive niche that occurred early in the time range of Homo erectus. The second was associated with no clear adaptive shift, though it does appear to have coincided with the invasion of more hostile environments and the appearance of systematic hunting of large mammals. Neither, however, occurred in a context of modern hunting and gathering.

Keywords:archaeology, symmetry, spatial cognition, evolution, Homo erectus
Subjects:Anthropology: Human Evolution
Psychology: Cognitive Psychology
Psychology: Evolutionary Psychology
ID code:bbs00002238
Deposited by:Thomas G Wynn on 27 April 2005



For editorial question, please e-mail the editorial office at: bbs@bbsonline.org

For technical question, contact site administrator at: support@bbsonline.org