^BBSnline

Processing Capacity Defined by Relational Complexity: Implications for Comparative, Developmental, and Cognitive Psychology

Halford, Graeme, Wilson, William H. and Phillips, Steven Processing Capacity Defined by Relational Complexity: Implications for Comparative, Developmental, and Cognitive Psychology.

Short Abstract:

It is argued that working memory limitations are best defined in terms of the complexity of relations that can be processed in parallel. Relational complexity is related to processing loads in problem solving, and discriminates between higher animal species, as well as between children of different ages. Complexity is defined by the number of dimensions, or sources of variation, that are related. A unary relation has one argument and one source of variation, because its argument can be instantiated in only one way at a time. A binary relation has two arguments, and two sources of variation, because two argument instantiations are possible at once. Similarly, a ternary relation is three dimensional, a quaternary relation is four dimensional, and so on. Dimensionality is related to number of chunks, because both attributes on dimensions and chunks are independent units of information of arbitrary size. Empirical studies of working memory limitations indicate a soft limit which corresponds to processing one quaternary relation in parallel. More complex concepts are processed by segmentation or conceptual chunking. Segmentation entails breaking tasks into components which do not exceed processing capacity, and which are processed serially. Conceptual chunking entails "collapsing" representations to reduce their dimensionality and consequently their processing load, but at the cost of making some relational information inaccessible. Parallel distributed processing implementations of relational representations show that relations with more arguments entail a higher computational cost, which corresponds to empirical observations of higher processing loads in humans. Empirical evidence is presented that relational complexity discriminates between higher species, is related to processing load in reasoning and in sentence comprehension, and that the complexity of relations processed by children increases with age. Implications are considered for neural net models, and for theories of cognition and cognitive development.

Long Abstract:

It is argued that working memory limitations are best defined in terms of the complexity of relations that can be processed in parallel. Relational complexity is related to processing loads in problem solving, and discriminates between higher animal species, as well as between children of different ages. Complexity is defined by the number of dimensions, or sources of variation, that are related. A unary relation has one argument and one source of variation, because its argument can be instantiated in only one way at a time. A binary relation has two arguments, and two sources of variation, because two argument instantiations are possible at once. Similarly, a ternary relation is three dimensional, a quaternary relation is four dimensional, and so on. Dimensionality is related to number of chunks, because both attributes on dimensions and chunks are independent units of information of arbitrary size. Empirical studies of working memory limitations indicate a soft limit which corresponds to processing one quaternary relation in parallel. More complex concepts are processed by segmentation or conceptual chunking. Segmentation entails breaking tasks into components which do not exceed processing capacity, and which are processed serially. Conceptual chunking entails "collapsing" representations to reduce their dimensionality and consequently their processing load, but at the cost of making some relational information inaccessible. Parallel distributed processing implementations of relational representations show that relations with more arguments entail a higher computational cost, which corresponds to empirical observations of higher processing loads in humans. Empirical evidence is presented that relational complexity discriminates between higher species, is related to processing load in reasoning and in sentence comprehension, and that the complexity of relations processed by children increases with age. Implications are considered for neural net models, and for theories of cognition and cognitive development.

Keywords:	Capacity, complexity, working memory, central executive, resource, cognitive development, comparative psychology, neural nets, representation of relations, chunking
Subjects:	Psychology: Cognitive Psychology Psychology: Comparative Psychology Computer Science: Neural Nets Psychology: Developmental Psychology
ID code:	bbs00000550
Deposited by:	Graeme Halford on 02 May 2001