BBSnline
BBSPrints Archive

DOES THE CEREBELLUM LEARN STRATEGIES FOR THE OPTIMAL TIME-VARYING CONTROL OF JOINT STIFFNESS?


Home 

About 

Browse 

Search 

Register 

Subscriptions 

Deposit Papers 

Help


    

Smith, Allan M. (1996) DOES THE CEREBELLUM LEARN STRATEGIES FOR THE OPTIMAL TIME-VARYING CONTROL OF JOINT STIFFNESS?.

Full text available as:HTML

Short Abstract:

Although there is increasing agreement that the cerebellum plays an important role in motor learning, the basic substance of what constitutes motor learning has been difficult to define. Unless motor learning is somehow radically different from other forms of learning, it must involve relatively simple stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response associations. All forms of learning, including purely sensory associations and cognitive learning as well as motor learning effect changes in behavior generally. However, a singular characteristic of motor learning is that it adjusts joint and limb mechanics by altering the neural input to muscles through practice and mental rehearsal. The hypothesis proposed here is that the cerebellum plays an important role in motor learning by forming and storing associated muscle activation patterns for the time-varying control of limb mechanics. By modulating the co-contraction of agonist-antagonist muscles through adjustments in the timing and amplitude of muscle activity, the viscoelastic properties of joints can be appropriately regulated throughout movement and adapted for transitions between postures and movements. Optimal control of joint viscoelastic properties cannot be totally achieved by on-line corrections initiated by reflex feedback, because of the delays and consequent instabilities incurred. Instead, strategies for optimizing muscle activation patterns or synergies must be learned from the temporal association of proprioceptive stimuli signaling muscle lengths and forces and the rates of changes in these parameters with the reinforcement occurring when the movement achieves its objective. Such strategies would involve varying degrees of co-contraction or reciprocal inhibition of agonist-antagonist muscles which ultimately contribute to the joint and limb stiffness. Evidence from neural recordings and clinical and experimental lesion studies are presented suggesting that the cerebellum uses teleceptive and proprioceptive feedback as feedforward conditioned stimuli for specific muscle activation patterns contributing to joint stiffness (i.e. agonist-antagonist muscle synergies) for particular tasks and postures. A wide variety of observations are thought to be consistent with such a role for the cerebellum, but ultimately additional experiments could prove or disprove this hypothesis.

Long Abstract:

Although there is increasing agreement that the cerebellum plays an important role in motor learning, the basic substance of what constitutes motor learning has been difficult to define. Unless motor learning is somehow radically different from other forms of learning, it must involve relatively simple stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response associations. All forms of learning, including purely sensory associations and cognitive learning as well as motor learning effect changes in behavior generally. However, a singular characteristic of motor learning is that it adjusts joint and limb mechanics by altering the neural input to muscles through practice and mental rehearsal. The hypothesis proposed here is that the cerebellum plays an important role in motor learning by forming and storing associated muscle activation patterns for the time-varying control of limb mechanics. By modulating the co-contraction of agonist-antagonist muscles through adjustments in the timing and amplitude of muscle activity, the viscoelastic properties of joints can be appropriately regulated throughout movement and adapted for transitions between postures and movements. Optimal control of joint viscoelastic properties cannot be totally achieved by on-line corrections initiated by reflex feedback, because of the delays and consequent instabilities incurred. Instead, strategies for optimizing muscle activation patterns or synergies must be learned from the temporal association of proprioceptive stimuli signaling muscle lengths and forces and the rates of changes in these parameters with the reinforcement occurring when the movement achieves its objective. Such strategies would involve varying degrees of co-contraction or reciprocal inhibition of agonist-antagonist muscles which ultimately contribute to the joint and limb stiffness. Evidence from neural recordings and clinical and experimental lesion studies are presented suggesting that the cerebellum uses teleceptive and proprioceptive feedback as feedforward conditioned stimuli for specific muscle activation patterns contributing to joint stiffness (i.e. agonist-antagonist muscle synergies) for particular tasks and postures. A wide variety of observations are thought to be consistent with such a role for the cerebellum, but ultimately additional experiments could prove or disprove this hypothesis.

Keywords:muscle synergies, agonist-antagonist co-contraction, joint stiffness, muscle activation strategies, multjoint limb control, cerebellum, motor learning
Subjects:BBS Special Issues: Controversies in Neuroscience: IV - Motor Learning and Synaptic Plasticity
Psychology: Learning and Memory
Neuroscience: Neural Modelling
Neuroscience: Motor Function
ID code:bbs00000479
Deposited by:Allen M Smith on 01 May 2001



Contact site administrator at: support@bbsonline.org