Volume 27 – Issue 01 – February 2004

 

Helen Hodges, Stevan Harnad, Barbara L. Finlay, Paul Bloom

In Memoriam: Jeffrey Gray (1934–2004).

BBS 2004 27 (1): 1-2.

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Scott Glover

Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 3-24.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Jos J. Adam, Ron F. Keulen

fMRI evidence for and behavioral evidence against the planning–control model.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 24-24.

 

P. Paolo Battaglini, Paolo Bernardis, Nicola Bruno

At least some electrophysiological and behavioural data cannot be reconciled with the planning–control model.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 24-25.

 

Gordon Binsted, Matthew Heath

Can the motor system utilize a stored representation to control movement?

BBS 2004 27 (1): 25-27.

 

Bruce Bridgeman

Defining visuomotor dissociations and an application to the oculomotor system.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 27-28.

 

Anne-Marie Brouwer, Eli Brenner, Jeroen B. J. Smeets

Using the same information for planning and control is compatible with the dynamic illusion effect.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 28-29.

 

Yann Coello, Yves Rossetti

Planning and controlling action in a structured environment: Visual illusion without dorsal stream.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 29-31.

 

H. Branch Coslett, Laurel J. Buxbaum

The planning–control model and spatio-motor deficits following brain damage.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 31-32.

 

Judy S. DeLoache

Scale errors by very young children: A dissociation between action planning and control.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 32-33.

 

Digby Elliott, Daniel V. Meegan

Visual context can influence on-line control.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 33-34.

 

Volker H. Franz

Is there a dynamic illusion effect in the motor system?

BBS 2004 27 (1): 34-35.

 

Valérie Gaveau, Michel Desmurget

Do movement planning and control represent independent modules?

BBS 2004 27 (1): 35-36.

 

Maurizio Gentilucci, Sergio Chieffi

How are cognition and movement control related to each other?

BBS 2004 27 (1): 36-37.

 

Melvyn A. Goodale, A. David Milner

Plans for action.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 37-40.

 

Scott H. Johnson-Frey

The organization of action representations in posterior parietal cortex.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 40-41.

 

Zsuzsa Káldy, Ilona Kovács

Is there an independent planning system? Suggestions from a developmental perspective.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 41-42.

 

Nobuyuki Kawai

Action planning in humans and chimpanzees but not in monkeys.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 42-43.

 

Richard Latto

Form follows function in visual information processing.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 43-44.

 

Matthew R. Longo, Bennett I. Bertenthal

Automaticity and inhibition in action planning.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 44-45.

 

Roger Newport, Sally Pears, Stephen R. Jackson

Evidence from optic ataxia does not support a distinction between planning and control mechanisms in human motor control.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 45-46.

 

James G. Phillips, Thomas J. Triggs, James W. Meehan

Planning and control of action as solutions to an independence of visual mechanisms.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 46-47.

 

Athanassios Raftopoulos

Two types of object representations in the brain, one nondescriptive process of reference fixing.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 47-48.

 

Verónica C. Ramenzoni, Michael A. Riley

Strong modularity and circular reasoning pervade the planning–control model

BBS 2004 27 (1): 48-49.

 

Patrice Revol, Claude Prablanc

Is efficient control of visually guided movement directly mediated by current feedback?

BBS 2004 27 (1): 49-50.

 

Luiz Carlos L. Silveira

Parallel visual pathways from the retina to the visual cortex – how do they fit?

BBS 2004 27 (1): 50-51.

 

David E. Vaillancourt, Mary A. Mayka, Daniel M. Corcos

The control process is represented in both the inferior and superior parietal lobules.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 51-52.

 

Paul van Donkelaar, Paul R. Dassonville

Further evidence for, and some against, a planning–control dissociation.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 52-53.

 

Peter M. Vishton

Human vision focuses on information relevant to a task, to the detriment of information that is not relevant.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 53-54.

 

David A. Westwood

Planning, control, and the illusion of explanation.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 54-55.

 

Charles E. Wright, Charles Chubb

Planning differences for chromaticity- and luminance-defined stimuli: A possible problem for Glover's planning–control model.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 55-56.

 

Myrka Zago, Francesco Lacquaniti, Alexandra Battaglia-Mayer, Roberto Caminiti

Planning and control: Are they separable in the brain? Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 56-57.

 

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

 

Scott Glover

Planning and control in action.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 57-69.

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Jeremy I. M. Carpendale, Charlie Lewis

Constructing an understanding of mind: The development of children's social understanding within social interaction.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 79-96.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Janet Wilde Astington

What's new about social construction? Distinct roles needed for language and communication.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 96-97.

 

Robin Banerjee

The role of social experience in advanced social understanding.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 97-98.

 

John Barresi, Chris Moore

Even an “epistemic triangle” has three sides.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 98-99.

 

Karen Bartsch, David Estes

Articulating the role of experience in mental state understanding: A challenge for theory-theory and other theories.

99-100.

 

Mark H. Bickhard

Why believe in beliefs?

BBS 2004 27 (1): 100-101.

 

Nancy Budwig

The contributions of the interdisciplinary study of language to an understanding of mind.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 101-102.

 

Olga Chesnokova

Agency mediation and an understanding of the mind.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 102-102.

 

A. P. Craig, L. Barrett

I ain't got no body: Developmental psychology must be embodied and enactive, as well as “social.”

BBS 2004 27 (1): 103-103.

 

Timothy J. Eddy

Children, chimpanzees, and social understanding: Inter- or intra-specific?

BBS 2004 27 (1): 103-104.

 

Charles Fernyhough

More than a context for learning? The epistemic triangle and the dialogic mind.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 104-105.

 

Peter Fonagy

The roots of social understanding in the attachment relationship: An elaboration on the constructionist theory.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 105-106.

 

Tim P. German, Alan M. Leslie

No (social) construction without (meta-)representation: Modular mechanisms as a basis for the capacity to acquire an understanding of mind.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 106-107.

 

Philip Gerrans

Individualism and cognitive development.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 107-108.

 

Suzanne Hala

The role of executive function in constructing an understanding of mind.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 108-109.

 

R. Peter Hobson

Understanding self and other.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 109-110.

 

Nina Howe

The sibling relationship as a context for the development of social understanding.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 110-111.

 

Carroll E. Izard

Emotions and emotion cognition contribute to the construction and understanding of mind.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 111-112.

 

Jennifer M. Jenkins, Keith Oatley

The space in between: The development of joint thinking and planning.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 112-113.

 

Susan R. Leekam

Reconstructing children's understanding of mind: Reflections from the study of atypical development.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 113-114.

 

Orlando M. Lourenço

Rich interactions and poor theories.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 114-115.

 

Victoria McGeer

Constructing agents: Rethinking the how and what in developmental theories of social understanding.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 115-115.

 

Elizabeth Meins

Infants' minds, mothers' minds, and other minds: How individual differences in caregivers affect the co-construction of mind.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 116-116.

 

Carol A. Miller, Ulrich Müller

Structure, genesis, and criteria.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 116-117.

 

Peter Mitchell

Being able to understand minds does not result from a conceptual shift.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 117-118.

 

Derek E. Montgomery

Challenging theory-theory accounts of social understanding: Where is the social constructivist advantage?

BBS 2004 27 (1): 118-119.

 

Katherine Nelson

Toward a collaborative community of minds

BBS 2004 27 (1): 119-120.

 

Ted Ruffman

Children's understanding of mind: Constructivist but theory-like.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 120-121.

 

John Shotter

Wittgensteinian developmental investigations.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 121-122.

 

Michael Siegal

Social understanding and the cognitive architecture of theory of mind.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 122-122.

 

Leslie Smith

Acts of judgment, not epistemic triangles.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 122-123.

 

Bryan W. Sokol, Christopher E. Lalonde

A penny is your thoughts? Reflections on a Wittgensteinian proposal.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 123-124.

 

Howard Steele

The social matrix reloaded: An attachment perspective on Carpendale & Lewis.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 124-125.

 

Douglas K. Symons

The internalization of mental state discourse contributes to social understanding.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 125-126.

 

Ross A. Thompson, H. Abigail Raikes

The mind in the mind of the beholder: Elucidating relational influences on early social understanding.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 126-127.

 

Penelope G. Vinden

In defense of enculturation.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 127-128.

 

Arlene S. Walker-Andrews, Judith A. Hudson

Interpretation based on richness of experience: Theory development from a social-constructivist perspective.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 128-129.

 

Camille Wilson-Brune, Amanda L. Woodward

What infants know about intentional action and how they might come to know it.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 129-129.

 

Stephanie Zerwas, Geetha Balaraman, Celia Brownell

Constructing an understanding of mind with peers.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 130-130.

 

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

 

Jeremy I. M. Carpendale, Charlie Lewis

Constructing understanding, with feeling.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 130-141.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Searle, J.

Minds, Brains, and Programs.

BBS 1980 3 (3): 417-457.

 

Peter Kugel

The Chinese room is a trick.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 153-154.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Mealey, L.

The sociobiology of sociopathy: An integrated evolutionary model.

BBS 1995 18 (3): 523-599.

 

Wim E. Crusio

The sociobiology of sociopathy: An alternative hypothesis.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 154-155.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Mazur, A., Booth, A.

Testosterone and dominance in men.

BBS 1998 21 (3): 353-397.

 

Helmuth Nyborg

Multivariate modelling of testosterone-dominance associations.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 155-159.

 

Jack van Honk, Dennis J. L. G. Schutter, Erno J. Hermans, Peter Putman

Testosterone, cortisol, dominance, and submission: Biologically prepared motivation, no psychological mechanisms involved.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 160-160.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Barcelou, L.W.

Perceptual symbol systems.

BBS 1999 22 (4): 577-660.

 

W. Martin Davies

Amodal or perceptual symbol systems: A false dichotomy?

BBS 2004 27 (1): 162-163.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Color, consciousness, and the isomorphism constraint.

BBS 1999 22 (6): 923-989.

 

Vincent A. Billock, Brian H. Tsou

Color, qualia, and psychophysical constraints on equivalence of color experience.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 164-165.

 

Richard Krivin

The what and how of color experience.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 165-166.

 

Gábor A. Zemplén

Newton's colour circle and Palmer's “normal” colour space.

BBS 2004 27 (1): 166-168.

 

Volume 27 – Issue 02 – April 2004

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Martin J. Pickering, Simon Garrod

Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 169-190.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Dale J. Barr, Boaz Keysar

Is language processing different in dialogue?

BBS 2004 27 (2): 190-191.

 

Holly P. Branigan

Full alignment of some but not all representations in dialogue.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 191-192.

 

Susan E. Brennan, Charles A. Metzing

Two steps forward, one step back: Partner-specific effects in a psychology of dialogue.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 192-193.

 

Sarah Brown-Schmidt, Michael K. Tanenhaus

Priming and alignment: Mechanism or consequence?

BBS 2004 27 (2): 193-194.

 

J. Cooper Cutting

A call for more dialogue and more details.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 194-194.

 

Peter F. Dominey

Situation alignment and routinization in language acquisition.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 195-195.

 

Fernanda Ferreira

Production-comprehension asymmetries.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 196-196.

 

Susan R. Fussell, Robert E. Kraut

Visual copresence and conversational coordination.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 196-197.

 

Jonathan Ginzburg

Intrinsic misalignment in dialogue: Why there is no unique context in a conversation.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 197-199.

 

Sam Glucksberg

Dialogue: Can two be cheaper than one?

BBS 2004 27 (2): 199-199.

 

Stephen D. Goldinger, Tamiko Azuma

Resonance within and between linguistic beings

BBS 2004 27 (2): 199-200.

 

Patrick G. T. Healey

Dialogue in the degenerate case?

BBS 2004 27 (2): 201-201.

 

Michael Kaschak, Arthur Glenberg

Interactive alignment: Priming or memory retrieval?

BBS 2004 27 (2): 210-202.

 

Ruth Kempson

Grammars with parsing dynamics: A new perspective on alignment.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 202-203.

 

Robert M. Krauss, Jennifer S. Pardo

Is alignment always the result of automatic priming?

BBS 2004 27 (2): 203-204.

 

Arthur B. Markman, Kyungil Kim, Levi B. Larkey, Lisa Narvaez, C. Hunt Stilwell

One alignment mechanism or many?

BBS 2004 27 (2): 204-205.

 

Allan Mazur

Beyond linguistic alignment.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 205-206.

 

Joseph J. Pear

Correspondences between the interactive alignment account and Skinner's in Verbal Behavior.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 206-207.

 

Emanuel A. Schegloff

Putting the interaction back into dialogue.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 207-208.

 

Niels O. Schiller, Jan Peter de Ruiter

Some notes on priming, alignment, and self-monitoring.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 208-209.

 

Michael F. Schober

Just how aligned are interlocutors' representations?

BBS 2004 27 (2): 209-210.

 

Hadas Shintel, Howard C. Nusbaum

Dialogue processing: Automatic alignment or controlled understanding?

BBS 2004 27 (2): 210-211.

 

Tessa Warren, Keith Rayner

Top-down influences in the interactive alignment model: The power of the situation model.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 211-211.

 

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

 

Martin J. Pickering, Simon Garrod

The interactive-alignment model: Developments and refinements.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 212-225.

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Seth Roberts

Self-experimentation as a source of new ideas: Ten examples about sleep, mood, health, and weight.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 227-262.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

David A. Booth

How observations on oneself can be scientific.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 262-263.

 

Michel Cabanac

Dionysians and Apollonians

BBS 2004 27 (2): 263-264.

 

Sigrid S. Glenn

Linking self-experimentation to past and future science: Extended measures, individual subjects, and the power of graphical presentation.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 264-264.

 

Joseph Glicksohn

From methodology to data analysis: Prospects for the n = 1 intrasubject design.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 264-266.

 

Irene Grote

Self-experimentation and self-management: Allies in combination therapies.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 266-267.

 

Franz Halberg, Germaine Cornélissen, Barbara Schack

Self-experimentation chronomics for health surveillance and science; also transdisciplinary civic duty?

BBS 2004 27 (2): 267-269.

 

Todd I. Lubart, Christophe Mouchiroud

Why does self-experimentation lead to creative ideas?

BBS 2004 27 (2): 269-270.

 

Harold L. Miller, Jr.

Self-experimentation as science.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 270-271.

 

Simon C. Moore, Joselyn L. Sellen

Can the process of experimentation lead to greater happiness?

BBS 2004 27 (2): 271-271.

 

Emanuel A. Schegloff

Experimentation or observation? Of the self alone or the natural world?

BBS 2004 27 (2): 271-272.

 

Peter Totterdell

Ideas galore: Examining the moods of a modern caveman.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 272-273.

 

Martin Voracek, Maryanne L. Fisher

The birth of a confounded idea: The joys and pitfalls of self-experimentation.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 273-272.

 

Daniel John Zizzo

Introspection and intuition in the decision sciences

BBS 2004 27 (2): 274-275.

 

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

 

Seth Roberts

Self-experimentation: Friend or foe?

BBS 2004 27 (2): 275-287.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Block, N.

On a confusion about a function of consciousness.

BBS 1995 18 (2): 227-287.

 

Michael V. Antony

Sidestepping the semantics of “consciousness.”

BBS 2004 27 (2): 289-290.

 

Oliver Kauffmann

Superblindsight, Inverse Anton, and tweaking A-consciousness further.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 290-294.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on van Gelder, T.

The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science.

BBS 1998 21 (5): 615-665.

 

Roy Lachman

Imposed intelligibility and strong claims concerning cognitive systems.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 294-295.

 

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

 

Tim van Gelder

Response to Lachman.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 295-295.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Levelt, W.J.M., Roelofs, A., Meyer, A.S.

A theory of lexical access in speech production.

BBS 1999 22 (1): 1-75.

 

Holly P. Branigan, Martin J. Pickering

Syntactic representation in the lemma stratum.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 296-297.

 

Friedemann Pulvermüller

Lexical access as a brain mechanism.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 297-299.

 

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

 

Willem J. M. Levelt, Antje S. Meyer, Ardi Roelofs

Relations of lexical access to neural implementation and syntactic encoding.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 299-301.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on O’Brien, G., Opie, J.

A connectionist theory of phenomenal experience.

BBS 1999 22 (1): 127-196.

 

Fernando Martínez-Manrique

Explicitness and nonconnectionist vehicle theories of consciousness.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 302-303.

 

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

 

Gerard O'Brien, Jonathan Opie

Vehicle, process, and hybrid theories of consciousness.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 303-305.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Campbell, A.

Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women’s intrasexual aggression.

BBS 1999 22 (2): 203-252.

 

János M. Réthelyi, Mária S. Kopp

Hierarchy disruption: Women and men.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 305-307.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Pulvermüller, F.

Words in the brain’s language.

BBS 1999 22 (2): 253-336.

 

Sidney J. Segalowitz, Korri Lane

Perceptual fluency and lexical access for function versus content words.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 307-308.

 

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

 

Friedemann Pulvermüller, Bettina Mohr

Determinants of ignition times: Topographies of cell assemblies and the activation <@PN>delays they imply.

BBS 2004 27 (2): 308-311.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Gold, I., Stoljar, D.

A neuron doctrine in the philosophy of neuroscience.

BBS 1999 22 (5): 809-869.

 

Maurice K. D. Schouten, Huib Looren de Jong

Could the neural ABC explain the mind?

BBS 2004 27 (2): 311-312.

 

Volume 27 – Issue 03 – June 2004

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Joachim I. Krueger, David C. Funder

Towards a balanced social psychology: Causes, consequences, and cures for the problem-seeking approach to social behavior and cognition.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 313-327.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Peter Borkenau, Nadine Mauer

Beware of individual differences.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 328-328.

 

Gary L. Brase

Functional clothes for the emperor.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 328-329.

 

Siu L. Chow

Additional requirements for a balanced social psychology.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 329-331.

 

John Darley, Alexander Todorov

Psychologists seek the unexpected, not the negative, to provoke innovative theory construction.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 331-332.

 

David Dunning

But what would a balanced approach look like?

BBS 2004 27 (3): 332-333.

 

Nicholas Epley, Leaf Van Boven, Eugene M. Caruso

Balance where it really counts.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 333-333.

 

Klaus Fiedler

Beyond negative and positive ideologies.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 334-334.

 

Aurelio José Figueredo, Mark J. Landau, Jon A. Sefcek

Apes and angels: Adaptationism versus Panglossianism.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 334-335.

 

James Friedrich

The “bias” bias in social psychology: Adaptive when and how?

BBS 2004 27 (3): 335-336.

 

Gerd Gigerenzer

The irrationality paradox.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 336-338.

 

Adam S. Goodie

Null hypothesis statistical testing and the balance between positive and negative approaches.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 338-339.

 

Samuel D. Gosling

Another route to broadening the scope of social psychology: Ecologically valid research.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 339-340.

 

Aiden P. Gregg, Constantine Sedikides

Is social psychological research really so negatively biased?

BBS 2004 27 (3): 340-341.

 

Kenneth R. Hammond

The wrong standard: Science, not politics, needed.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 341-341.

 

Alexander Haslam, Tom Postmes, Jolanda Jetten

Beyond balance: To understand “bias,” social psychology needs to address issues of politics, power, and social perspective.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 341-342.

 

Ralph Hertwig, Annika Wallin

Out of the theoretical cul-de-sac.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 342-343.

 

Bert H. Hodges

Asch and the balance of values.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 343-344.

 

Lee Jussim

The goodness of judgment index.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 344-345.

 

Tatsuya Kameda, Reid Hastie

Building an even better conceptual foundation.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 345-346.

 

Douglas T. Kenrick, Jon K. Maner

One path to balance and order in social psychology: An evolutionary perspective.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 346-347.

 

John F. Kihlstrom

Is there a “People are Stupid” school in social psychology?

BBS 2004 27 (3): 348-348.

 

Yechiel Klar, Uzi Levi

Not just a passion for negativity.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 349-349.

 

Justin Kruger, Kenneth Savitsky

The “reign of error” in social psychology: On the real versus imagined consequences of problem-focused research.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 349-350.

 

Alan J. Lambert, B. Keith Payne, Larry L. Jacoby

Accuracy and error: Constraints on process models in social psychology.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 350-351.

 

Michael P. Maratsos

People actually are about as bad as social psychologists say, or worse.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 351-352.

 

Andreas Ortmann, Michal Ostatnicky

Proper experimental design and implementation are necessary conditions for a balanced social psychology.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 352-353.

 

Richard E. Petty

Multi-process models in social psychology provide a more balanced view of social thought and action.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 353-354.

 

Dennis T. Regan, Thomas Gilovich

Social psychological research isn't negative, and its message fosters compassion, not cynicism.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 354-355.

 

Norbert Schwarz

Errors of judgment and the logic of conversation.

BBS 2004 27 (3): 355-355.