Volume 24 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLE
Thelen, Esther, Schoner,
Gregor, Scheier, Christian, Smith, Linda B.
The dynamics
of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 1-34.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Berger, Sarah E.
Accounting
for infant perseveration beyond the manual search task.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 34-35.
Burns, Melissa, Domjan,
Michael.
Plus maze
experiments and the boundary conditions of the dynamic field model.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 35-36.
Cisek, Paul.
Embodiment
is all in the head.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 36-38.
Diamond, Adele.
Looking
closely at infants' performance and experimental procedures in the A-not-B
task.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 38-41.
Dounskaia, N., Stelmach,
G.E.
Movement
planning and movement execution: What is in between?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 41-42.
Freeman, Walter J.
The
behavior-cognition link is well done; the cognition-brain link needs more work.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 42-43.
Glenberg, Arthur M.,
Cowart, Monica R., Kaschak, Michael P.
An
affordance field for guiding movement and cognition.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 43-44.
Hailman, Jack P.
Why the
Piagetian A-not-B phenomenon is no error: A comparative perspective.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 44-45.
Harter, Derek, Graesser,
Arthur C., Franklin, Stan.
Bridging the
gap: Dynamics as a unified view of cognition.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 45-46.
Latash, Mark L.
Mirror
writing: Adults making A-non-B errors?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 46-46.
Lewis, Marc D.
Self-organizing
brains don't develop gradually.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 47-47.
Lockman, Jeffrey J.
An embodied
theory of cognitive development: Within reach?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 48-48.
Marcovitch, Stuart,
Zelazo, Philip David.
On the need
for conscious control and conceptual understanding.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 48-49.
Mareschal, Denis.
Can there be
embodiment without a body/brain?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 49-50.
Markman, Arthur B.
Are
dynamical systems the answer?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 50-51.
McCollum, Gin.
Navigating
the complex dynamics of memory and desire: Mathematics accommodates continuous
and conditional dynamics.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 51-53.
Is a field
theory of perseverative reaching compatible with a Piagetian view?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 53-53.
McDonough, Laraine.
Infants
reach to location A without practice or training.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 54-54.
Michel, George F.
What is
embodied: “A-not-B error” or delayed-response learning?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 54-55.
Müller, Ulrich,
Carpendale, Jeremy I.M.
Objectivity,
intentionality, and levels of explanation.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 55-56.
Munakata, Yoke, Sahni,
Sarah Devi, Yervys, Benjamin E.
An embodied
theory in search of a body: Challenges for a dynamic systems model of infant
perseveration.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 56-57.
Newcombe, Nora S.
A spatial
coding analysis of the A-not-B error: What IS “Location at A”?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 57-58.
The role of
action representations in the dynamics of embodied cognition.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 58-59.
Pelphrey, Kevin A.,
Reznick, J. Steven.
Clothing a
model of embodiment.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 59-59.
Roberts, Patrick D.
Cooperative
field theory is critical for embodiment.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 59-60.
Ruffman, Ted.
Understanding
A-not-B errors as a function of object representation and deficits in attention
rather than motor memories.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 61-61.
Sophian, Catherine.
Does
cognitive development move beyond sensorimotor intelligence?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 61-62.
Spencer, John P.
The essence
of cognitive development.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 62-63.
Staddon, J.E.R., Machado,
A., Lourenço, O.
Plus ça
change . . . : Jost, Piaget, and the dynamics of embodiment.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 63-65.
Takeshita, Hideko.
Dynamic
comparison of the development of combinatory manipulations between chimpanzee
and human infants.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 65-66.
Tschacher, Wolfgang,
Junghan, Ulrich M.
Next step,
synergetics?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 66-67.
Valenti, S. Stavros,
Stoffregen, Thomas A.
The social
dynamics of embodied cognition.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 67-68.
Vindras, Philippe, Gentaz,
Edouard.
Do adults
make A-not-B errors in pointing?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 68-70.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Thelen, Esther, Schöner,
Gregor, Scheier, Christian, Smith, Linda B.
So what's a
modeler to do?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 70-80.
TARGET ARTICLE
Cowan, Nelson.
The magical
number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 87-114.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Avons, S.E., Ward, Geoff,
Russo, Riccardo.
The dangers
of taking capacity limits too literally.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 114-115.
Baars, Bernard J.
A
biocognitive approach to the conscious core of immediate memory.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 115-116.
Bachelder, Bruce L.
The magical
number 4 = 7: Span theory on capacity limitations.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 116-117.
Baddeley, Alan.
The magic
number and the episodic buffer.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 117-118.
Beaman, C. Philip.
The size and
nature of a chunk.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 118-118.
Davis, Greg.
There is no
four-object limit on attention.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 119-120.
Ericsson, K. Anders, Kirk,
Elizabeth P.
The search
for fixed generalizable limits of “pure STM” capacity: Problems with
theoretical proposals based on independent chunks.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 120-121.
Gratton, Gabriele,
Fabiani, Monica, Corballis, Paul M.
Working
memory capacity and the hemispheric organization of the brain.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 121-122.
Grondin, Simon.
A temporal
account of the limited processing capacity.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 122-123.
Halford, Graeme S.,
Philips, Steven, Wilson, William H.
Processing
capacity limits are not explained by storage limits.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 123-124.
Hecht, Steven A.,
Shackelford, Todd K.
Pure
short-term memory capacity has implications for understanding individual
differences in math skills.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 124-125.
Jensen, Ole, Lisman, John
E.
Dual
oscillations as the physiological basis for capacity limits.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 126-126.
Jou, Jerwen.
The magic
number four: Can it explain Sternberg's serial memory scan data?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 126-127.
Kawai, Nobuyki, Matsuzawa,
Tetsuro.
“Magical
number 5” in a chimpanzee.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 127-128.
Lane, Peter C.R., Gobet,
Fernand, Cheng, Peter C-H.
What forms
the chunks in a subject's performance? Lessons from the CHREST computational
model of learning.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 128-129.
McElree, Brian, Dosher,
Barbara Anne.
The focus of
attention across space and across time.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 129-130.
McKone, Elinor.
Capacity
limits in continuous old-new recognition and in short-term implicit memory.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 130-131.
Milner, Peter M.
Magical
attention.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 131-131.
Morra, Sergio.
Nothing left
in store . . . but how do we measure attentional capacity?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 132-133.
Murray, David J.
Partial
matching theory and the memory span.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 133-134.
Muter, Paul.
The nature
of forgetting from short-term memory.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 134-134.
Nairne, James S., Neath,
Ian.
Long-term
memory span.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 134-135.
Oades, Robert D., Jemel,
Boutheina.
Where the
magic breaks down: Boundaries and the “focus-of-attention” in schizophrenia.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 135-136.
Pascual-Leone, Juan.
If the
magical number is 4, how does one account for operations within working memory?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 136-138.
Pothos, Emmanual M.,
Juola, Patrick.
Linguistic
structure and short term memory.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 138-139.
Raffone, Antonio, Wolters,
Gezinus, Murre, Jacob M.
A
neurophysioiogical account of working memory limits: Between-item segregation
and within-chunk integration.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 139-141.
Rensink, Ronald A.
Four-sight
in hindsight: The existence of magical numbers in vision.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 141-142.
Roelfsema, Pieter R.,
Lamme, Victor A.F.
Which brain
mechanism cannot count beyond four?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 142-143.
Rypma, Bart, Gabrieli,
John D.E.
Functional
neuroimaging of short-term memory: The neural mechanisms of mental storage.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 143-144.
Schneider, Werner X.,
Deubel, Heiner, Wesenick, Maria-Barbara.
Characterizing
chunks in visual short-term memory: Not more than one feature per dimension?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 144-145.
Scholl, Brian J., Xu,
Yaoda.
The magical
number 4 in vision.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 145-146.
Schubert, Torsten, Frensch,
Peter A.
How unitary
is the capacity-limited attentional focus?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 146-147.
Taatgen, Niels A.
Dispelling
the magic: Towards memory without capacity.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 147-148.
Tiitinen, Hannu.
How to
interface cognitive psychology with cognitive neuroscience?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 148-149.
Todt, Dietmar.
Studies of
STM properties in animals may help us better understand the nature of our own
storage limitations: The case of birdsong acquisition.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 149-150.
Towse, John N.
Memory
limits: “Give us an answer!”
BBS 2001 24 (1): 150-151.
Usher, Marius, Cohen,
Jonathan D., Haarmann, Henk, Horn, David.
Neural
mechanism for the magical number 4: Competitive interactions and nonlinear
oscillation.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 151-152.
Wilding, John.
Over the
top: Are there exceptions to the basic capacity limit?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 152-153.
Woodman, Geoffrey F.,
Vogel, Edward K., Luck, Steven J.
Attention is
not unitary.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 153-154.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Cowan, Nelson.
Metatheory
of storage capacity limits.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 154-176.
CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Gray, J.A.
The contents of
consciousness: A neuropsychological conjecture.
BBS
1995 18: 659-722.
Duch, Wlodzislaw.
Facing the
hard question.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 187-188.
Joseph, Michael H.,
Joseph, Samuel R.H.
The contents
of consciousness: From C to shining C++.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 188-189.
Merfeld, Daniel M.
Must all
action halt during sensorimotor mismatch?
BBS 2001 24 (1): 189-190.
Vine, Ian.
Motivating
consciousness.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 190-191.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Gray, Jeffrey.
No easy
answers to hard or easy questions.
BBS 2001 24 (1): 191-193.
Volume 24 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLE
Stoffregen, Thomas A.,
Bardy, Benoît G.
On
specification and the senses.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 195-213.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Adolph, Karen E., Marin,
Ludovic M., Fraisse, Frederic F.
Learning and
exploration: Lessons from infants.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 213-214.
Ahrens, Kurt F.
Physiological
convergence of sensory signals as a prelude to perception.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 214-214.
Brenner, Eli, Smeets,
Jeroen B.J.
We are
better off without perfect perception.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 215-216.
Burton, Gregory A.
How many
systems make a global array?
BBS 2001 24 (2): 216-217.
Cabe, Patrick A.
Absolutist
array specification and species survival: An ecological perspective on
ecological perception.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 217-217.
Coello, Yann, Rossetti,
Yves.
The patterns
of energy used for action are task-dependent.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 218-219.
Costall, Alan, Parovel,
Giulia, Sinico, Michele.
Getting real
about invariants.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 219-220.
Feldman, Anatol G.,
Lestienne, Francis G.
With either
separate or integrated arrays of senses, perception may not be direct.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 220-221.
Flom, Ross A.,
The global
array: Not new to infant researchers.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 221-222.
Foo, Patrick, Kelso,
J.A.S.
Goal
directed meaning connects perception and specification.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 222-223.
Hughes, Barry.
Specification,
information, and the loss of receptor systems.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 223-223.
Kujala, Teija.
Brain
science: A more direct way of understanding our senses.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 224-224.
Leighty, Katherine A.,
Cummins-Sebree, Sarah E., Fragaszy, Dorothy M.
Expanding
the theory: Nonverbal determination of referents in a joystick task.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 224-225.
Lewkowicz, David J.,
Scheier, Christian.
Situating
situated multimodal perception: The relevance of global arrays to development.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 225-226.
Mace, William M.
Amodal specifying
information: Where is occlusion?
BBS 2001 24 (2): 226-227.
Mark, Leonard S.
Toward a
strategy for demonstrating the perceptual independence of the global array from
individual sensory arrays.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 227-227.
McMichael, Kipp, Bingham,
Geoffrey.
Functional
separation of the senses is a requirement of perception/action research.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 227-228.
Mergner, Thomas, Becker,
Wolfgang.
A different
way to combine direct perception with intersensory interaction.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 228-230.
Michaels, Claire F.,
Oudejans, Raoul R.D.
Energy,
information, detection, and action.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 230-230.
Neelon, Michael F.,
Act
globally, think locally.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 231-232.
Myin, Erik
Fragmentation,
coherence, and the perception/action divide.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 231-231.
Oie, Kelvin S., Jeka, John
J.
Input-driven
behavior: One extreme of the multisensory perceptual continuum.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 232-233.
Pailhous, Jean, Varraine,
Elodie, Bonnard, Mireille.
Is the brain
specified?
BBS 2001 24 (2): 233-234.
Pallas, Sarah L.
Cortical
specification makes sense.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 234-234.
Peper, C. (Lieke) E.,
Beek, Peter J.
Direct
perception of global invariants is not a fruitful notion.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 235-235.
Pickering, John.
How
important is specificity?
BBS 2001 24 (2): 235-236.
Pittenger, John B.
Three
consequences of believing that information lies in global arrays and that
perceptual systems use this information.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 236-237.
Riccio, Gary E., van
Emmerik, Richard E.A., Peters, Brian T.
Movement
dynamics and the environment to be perceived.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 237-238.
Riley, Michael A.
Inadequate
information and deficient perception.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 238-239.
Rosenblum, Lawrence D.,
Gordon, Michael S.
The generality
of specificity: Some lessons from audiovisual speech.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 239-240.
Runeson, Sverker, Jacobs,
David M., Andersson, Isabell E.K., Kreegipuu, Kairi.
Specificity
is always contingent on constraints: Global versus individual arrays is not the
issue.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 240-241.
Thomas, Nigel J.T.
Perceptual
systems: Five+, one, or many?
BBS 2001 24 (2): 241-242.
Vereijken, Beatrix,
Whiting, H.T.A. (John)
“The
assumption of separate senses”: Pervasive? Perhaps – Persuasive? Hardly!
BBS 2001 24 (2): 242-243.
Wade, Nicholas J.
Abolition of
the senses.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 243-244.
Walker-Andrews, Arlene.
Infants,
too, are global perceivers.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 244-245.
Wertheim, A.H.
Motion,
frames of reference, dead horses, and metaphysics.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 245-246.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Stoffregen, Thomas A.,
Bardy, Benoît G.
Specification
in the global array.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 246-254.
TARGET ARTICLE
Finlay, Barbara L.,
Developmental
structure in brain evolution.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 263-278.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Aboitiz, Francisco.
What
determines evolutionary brain growth?
BBS 2001 24 (2): 278-279.
Airey, David C., Williams,
Robert W.
Quantitative
neurogenetic perspectives.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 279-280.
Bach-y-Rita, Paul, Aiello,
Gaetano L.
Brain
energetics and evolution.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 280-281.
Barton, Robert A.
The
coordinated structure of mosaic brain evolution.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 281-282.
Deaner, Robert O., van
Schaik, Carel P.
Flaws in
evolutionary theory and interpretation.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 282-283.
Confounding
explanations. . . .
BBS 2001 24 (2): 283-283.
Elliott, Terry.
D'Arcy
Wentworth Thompson, interindividual variation, and postnatal neuronal growth.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 284-284.
Gilissen, Emmanuel,
Simmons, Robert M.T.
Brain
evolution: A matter of constraints and permissions?
BBS 2001 24 (2): 284-286.
Holloway, Ralph L.
Does
allometry mask important brain structure residuals relevant to species-specific
behavioral evolution?
BBS 2001 24 (2): 286-287.
Innocenti, Giorgio M.
The time
when the “Tomte” of evolution was playing with time.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 287-287.
Iwaniuk, Andrew N.,
Whishaw, Ian Q.
The spandrel
may be related to culture not brain function.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 288-288.
Kaas, Jon H., Collins,
Christine E.
Variability
in the sizes of brain parts.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 288-290.
Lovejoy, C. Owen.
Hominid
brain expansion and reproductive success.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 290-290.
Marino, Lori.
Cetaceans
would be an interesting comparison group.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 290-291.
Ragir, Sonia.
Changes in
perinatal conditions selected for neonatal immaturity.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 291-292.
Rilling, James K.
Allometric
departures for the human brain provide insights into hominid brain evolution.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 292-293.
Schoenemann, P. Thomas.
Brain
scaling, behavioral ability, and human evolution.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 293-295.
Stout, Dietrich.
Constraint
and adaptation in primate brain evolution.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 295-296.
Striedter, Georg F.
Brain evolution:
How constrained is it?
BBS 2001 24 (2): 296-297.
Wilczynski, Walter.
Brain
allometry: Correlated variation in cytoarchitectonics and neurochemistry?
BBS 2001 24 (2): 297-298.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Finlay, Barbara L.,
Developmental
structure in brain evolution.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 298-304.
TARGET ARTICLE
Rendell, Luke, Whitehead,
Hal.
Culture in
whales and dolphins.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 309-324.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Barkow, Jerome H.
Culture and
hyperculture: Why can't a cetacean be more like a (hu)man?
BBS 2001 24 (2): 324-325.
Barrett-Lennard, L.G.,
Deecke, V.B., Yurk, H., Ford, J.K.B.
A sound
approach to the study of culture.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 325-326.
Bauer, Gordon B., Harley,
Heidi E.
The mimetic
dolphin.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 326-327.
Blute, Marion.
Social
learning by observation is analogue, instruction is digital.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 327-327.
Boesch, Christophe.
Sacrileges
are welcome in science! Opening a discussion about culture in animals.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 327-328.
Brown, William Michael.
Genomic
imprinting and culture in mammals.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 328-329.
Connor, Richard C.
Individual
foraging specializations in marine mammals: Culture and ecology.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 329-330.
Day, Rachel L., Kendal,
Jeremy R., Laland, Kevin N.
Validating
cultural transmission in cetaceans.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 330-331.
Deputte, Bertrand L.
Culture in
cetaceans: Why put the cart before the horse?
BBS 2001 24 (2): 331-332.
So how do they do it?
BBS 2001 24 (2): 332-333.
Fox, Michael Allen.
Cetaecean
culture: Philosophical implications.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 333-334.
Freeberg, Todd M.
Communicative
cultures in cetaceans: Big questions are unanswered, functional analyses are
needed.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 334-334.
Galef, Bennett G.
Where's the
beef? Evidence of culture, imitation, and teaching, in cetaceans?
BBS 2001 24 (2): 335-335.
Herman, Louis M., Pack,
Adam A.
Laboratory
evidence for cultural transmission mechanisms.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 335-337.
Ingold, Tim.
The use and
abuse of ethnography.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 337-337.
Janik, Vincent M.
Is cetacean
social learning unique?
BBS 2001 24 (2): 337-338.
Kako, Edward.
The promise
of an ecological, evolutionary approach to culture and language.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 338-339.
Knight, Chris.
Does
cultural evolution need matriliny?
BBS 2001 24 (2): 339-340.
Kuczaj, Stan.
Cetacean
culture: Slippery when wet.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 340-341.
Lynn, Spencer K.,
Pepperberg, Irene M.
Culture: In
the beak of the beholder?
BBS 2001 24 (2): 341-342.
Maestripieri, Dario,
Whitham, Jessica.
Teaching in
marine mammals? Anecdotes versus science.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 342-343.
Mann, Janet.
Cetacean
culture: Definitions and evidence.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 343-343.
Mayer-Kress, Gottfried,
Porter, Mason A.
Remarks on
whale cultures from a complex systems perspective.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 344-344.
Mercado, Eduardo, DeLong,
Caroline M.
Experiments
are the key to understanding socially acquired knowledge in cetaceans.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 345-345.
Mesnick, Sarah L.
Genetic
relatedness in sperm whales: Evidence and cultural implications.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 346-347.
Miller, Patrick J.O.
Cetacean
science does not have to be pseudo-science.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 347-348.
Mitchell, Robert W.
On not
drawing the line about culture: Inconsistencies in interpretation of nonhuman
cultures.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 348-349.
O’Malley, Robert C.
Parallels
and contrasts with primate cultural research.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 349-349.
Poirier, Frank E., Fitton,
Lori J.
Primate
cultural worlds: Monkeys, apes, and humans.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 349-350.
Premack, David, Hauser,
Marc D.
A whale of a
tale: Calling it culture doesn't help.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 350-351.
Pryor, Karen W.
Cultural
transmission of behavior in animals: How a modern training technology uses
spontaneous social imitation in cetaceans and facilitates social imitation in
horses and dogs.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 352-352.
Rauch, Alan.
Cetacean
culture: Resisting myths and addressing lacunae.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 352-353.
Reader, Simon M.,
Lefebvre, Louis.
Social learning
and sociality.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 353-355.
Ripoll, Thierry, Vauclair,
Jacques.
Can culture
be inferred only from the absence of genetic and environmental actors?
BBS 2001 24 (2): 355-356.
Slater, P.J.B.
There's
CULTURE and “Culture.”
BBS 2001 24 (2): 356-357.
Thomas, Rebecca.
Marine
versus terrestrial variability in relation to social learning.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 357-357.
Tschudin, Alain J-P.C.
Getting at
animal culture: The interface of experimental and ethnographic evidence in
dolphins.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 357-358.
Tyack, Peter L.
Cetacean
culture: Humans of the sea?
BBS 2001 24 (2): 358-359.
Whiten, Andrew.
Imitation
and cultural transmission in apes and cetaceans.
BBS 2001 24 (2): 359-360.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Rendell, L., Whitehead, H.
Cetacean culture: Still
afloat after the first naval engagement of the culture wars.
BBS
2001 24 (2): 360.
Volume 24 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLE
Hertwig, Ralph, Ortmann,
Andreas.
Experimental
practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists?
BBS 2001 24 (3): 383-403.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Baron, Jonathan.
Purposes and
methods.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 403-403.
Betsch, Tilmann,
Haberstroh, Susanne.
Financial
incentives do not pave the road to good experimentation.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 404-404.
Blaich, Charles F.,
Barreto, Humberto.
Typological
thinking, statistical significance, and the methodological divergence of
experimental psychology and economics.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 405-405.
Davis, Hasker P.,
Economic and
psychological experimental methodology: Separating the wheat from the chaff.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 405-406.
Erev, Ido.
On
accumulation of information and model selection.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 406-407.
Fantino, Edmund,
Stolarz-Fantino, Stephanie.
Behavioral
and economic approaches to decision making: A common ground.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 407-408.
Gigerenzer, Gerd.
Are we
losing control?
BBS 2001 24 (3): 408-409.
Gil-White, Francisco J.
A good
experiment of choice behavior is a good caricature of a real situation.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 409-410.
Gillies, Anthony S.,
Rigdon, Mary.
Theory-testing
experiments in the economics laboratory.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 410-411.
Gintis, Herbert.
The
contribution of game theory to experimental design in the behavioral sciences.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 411-412.
Goodie, Adam S.
Are scripts
or deception necessary when repeated trials are used? On the social context of
psychological experiments.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 412-412.
Guala, Francesco.
Clear-cut
designs versus the uniformity of experimental practice.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 412-413.
Harrison, Glenn W.,
Rutström, E. Elisabet.
Doing it
both ways – experimental practice and heuristic context.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 413-414.
Henrich, Joseph.
Challenges
for everyone: Real people, deception, one-shot games, social learning, and
computers.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 414-415.
Hilton, Denis J.
Is the
challenge for psychologists to return to behaviourism?
BBS 2001 24 (3): 415-416.
Hogarth, Robin M.
To what are
we trying to generalize?
BBS 2001 24 (3): 416-417.
Holt, Charles A., Laury,
Susan K.
Varying the
scale of financial incentives under real and hypothetical conditions.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 417-418.
Huettel, Scott A.,
Lockhead, Gregory.
Variability
is not uniformly bad: The practices of psychologists generate research
questions.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 418-419.
Kühberger, Anton.
Why use real
and hypothetical payoffs?
BBS 2001 24 (3): 419-420.
Kurzban, Robert.
Are
experimental economists behaviorists and is behaviorism for the birds?
BBS 2001 24 (3): 420-421.
Lecoutre, Marie-Paule,
Lecoutre, Bruno.
Other scientific
purposes, other methodological ways.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 421-421.
Levine, Daniel S.
In partial
defense of softness.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 421-422.
Maratsos, Michael.
We should
not impose narrow restrictions on psychological methods.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 422-423.
Markman, Arthur B.
Choice
output and choice processing: An analogy to similarity.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 423-424.
McKenzie, Craig R.M.,
Wixted, John T.
Participant
skepticism: If you can't beat it, model it.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 424-425.
Rakow, Tim.
Theorize it
both ways?
BBS 2001 24 (3): 425-426.
Ross, Don.
The
game-theoretic innocence of experimental behavioral psychology.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 426-427.
Roth, Alvin E.
Form and
function in experimental design.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 427-428.
Smith,
From old
issues to new directions in experimental psychology and economics.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 428-429.
Suleiman, Ramzi.
Different
perspectives of human behavior entail different experimental practices.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 429-429.
Van Vugt, Mark.
Self-interest
as self-fulfilling prophecy.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 429-430.
Weber,
Meta-theory
rather than method fascism.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 430-431.
Weiss, David J.
Deception by
researchers is necessary and not necessarily evil.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 431-432.
Zizzo, Daniel John.
Individual
psychology, market scaffolding, and behavioral tests.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 432-433.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Hertwig, Ralph, Ortmann,
Andreas.
Money, lies,
and replicability: On the need for empirically grounded experimental practices
and interdisciplinary discourse.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 433-444.
TARGET ARTICLE
Humphreys, Glyn W., Forde,
Hierarchies,
similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “Category-specific”
neuropsychological deficits.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 453-476.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Arguin, Martin, Saumier,
Daniel.
Shortcomings
of the HIT framework and possible solutions.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 476-477.
Arterberry, Martha E.
Making
living versus nonliving distinctions: Lessons from infants.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 477-478.
Barrett, H. Clark.
Is category
specificity in the world or in the mind?
BBS 2001 24 (3): 478-479.
Bub, Daniel, Bukach,
Cindy.
Limitations
on current explanations of category-specific agnosia.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 479-480.
Cree, George S., McRae,
Ken.
Beyond the
sensory/functional dichotomy.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 480-481.
Davidoff, Jules.
Category-specific
deficits: Will a simpler model do?
BBS 2001 24 (3): 481-482.
de Almeida, Roberto G.
Conceptual
deficits without features: A view from atomism.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 482-483.
Graf, Markus, Schneider,
Werner X.
Structural
descriptions in HIT – a problematic commitment.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 483-484.
Lamberts, Koen.
Category-specific
deficits and exemplar models.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 484-485.
Ralph, Matthew A. Lambon,
Garrard, Peter.
Category-specific
deficits: Insights from semantic dementia and Alzheimer's disease.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 485-486.
Laws, Keith R.
What is
structural similarity and is it greater in living things?
BBS 2001 24 (3): 486-487.
Leek, E.C., Pothos, E.M.
What is
specific about category specificity? Fractionating patterns of impairments and
the spurious living/nonliving dichotomy.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 487-488.
The
sensory/functional assumption or the data: Which do we keep?
BBS 2001 24 (3): 488-489.
Pillon, Agnesa, Samson,
Dana.
On
disentangling and weighting kinds of semantic knowledge.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 490-490.
Pulvermüller, Friedemann.
Mutual
access and mutual dependence of conceptual components.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 490-492.
Saffran, Eleanor M.,
Coslett, H. Branch.
Further
evidence in support of a distributed semantic memory system.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 492-493.
Tanaka, James.
Where are
object properties? In the world or in the mind?
BBS 2001 24 (3): 493-494.
Thioux, Marc, Turconi,
Eva, Palmers, Emanuelle, Seron, Xavier.
About
numbers as a semantic category.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 494-495.
Concepts and
categories: What is the evidence for neural specialisation?
BBS 2001 24 (3): 495-496.
Zaitchik, Deborah, Solomon,
Gregg E.A.
Putting
semantics back into the semantic representation of living things.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 496-497.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Humphreys, Glyn W., Forde,
Category
specificity in mind and brain?
BBS 2001 24 (3): 497-504.
TARGET ARTICLE
A general
account of selection: Biology, immunology, and behavior.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 511-528.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Baum, William M.
Two
stumbling blocks to a general account of selection: Replication and
information.
BBS 2001 24 (3): 528-528.
Bevins, Rick A.
Should we
essentially ignore the role of stimuli in a general account of operant
selection?
BBS 2001 24 (3): 528-529.
Blute, Marion.