Volume 23 – Issue 01 – February 2000

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Grodzinsky, Yosef.

The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 1-21.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Bánréti, Zoltán.

Which grammar has been chosen for neurological feasibility?
BBS
2000 23 (1): 21-22.

 

Ben Shalom, Dorit.

Trace deletion and Friederici's (1995) model of syntactic processing.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 22-23.

 

Beretta, Alan.

Why the TDH fails to contribute to a neurology of syntax.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 23-23.

 

Berndt, Rita Sloan.

Sentence comprehension in Broca's aphasia: A critique of the evidence.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 24-24.

 

Bickerton, Derek.

Broca's demotion does not doom universal grammar.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 25-25.

 

Caplan, David.

Lesion location and aphasic syndrome do not tell us whether a patient will have an isolated deficit affecting the coindexation of traces.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 25-27.

 

Cappa, Stefano F., Moro, Andrea, Perani, Daniela, Piatelli-Palmarini, Massimo.

Broca's aphasia, Broca's area, and syntax: A complex relationship.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 27-28.

 

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew.

Broca's area and language evolution.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 28-29.

 

Dick, Frederic, Bates, Elizabeth.

Grodzinsky's latest stand – or, just how specific are “lesion-specific” deficits?
BBS
2000 23 (1): 29-29.

 

Dominey, Peter F., Lelekov, Taïssia.

Nonlinguistic transformation processing in agrammatic aphasia.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 30-30.

 

Dronkers, Nina F.

The gratuitous relationship between Broca's aphasia and Broca's area.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 30-31.

 

Edwards, Susan, Lightfoot, David.

Intact grammars but intermittent access.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 31-32.

 

Friederici, Angela D., Yves von Cramon, D.

Syntax in the brain: Linguistic versus neuroanatomical specificity.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 32-33.

 

Friedmann, Na’ama.

Agrammatic comprehension of OVS and OSV structures in Hebrew.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 33-34.

 

Frisch, Stefan, Saddy, Douglas, Friederici, Angela D.

Cutting a long story (too) short.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 34-35.

 

Hickok, Gregory.

The left frontal convolution plays no special role in syntactic comprehension.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 35-36.

 

Hillert, Dieter.

The grammar of agrammatism.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 36-37.

 

Kay, Paul.

Comprehension deficits of Broca's aphasics provide no evidence for traces.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 37-38.

 

Kempen, Gerard.

Could grammatical encoding and grammatical decoding be subserved by the same processing module?
BBS
2000 23 (1): 38-39.

 

Kolk, Herman H.J., Hartsuiker, Robert J.

Agrammatic sentence processing: Severity, complexity, and priming.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 39-40.

 

Levelt, Willem J.M.

The brain does not serve linguistic theory so easily.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 40-41.

 

Luzzatti, Claudio, Guasti, Maria Teresa.

Agrammatism, syntactic theory, and the lexicon: Broca's area and the development of linguistic ability in the human brain.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 41-42.

 

Müller, Ralph-Axel.

A big “housing” problem and a trace of neuroimaging: Broca's area is more than a transformation center.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 42-42.

 

Murray, David J.

The Trace Deletion Hypothesis in relation to partial matching theory.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 43-44.

 

Newmeyer, Frederick J.

Agent-assignment, tree-pruning, and Broca's aphasia.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 44-45.

 

O’Grady, William.

Language, mathematics, and cerebral distinctness.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 45-45.

 

Otsu, Yukio.

Scrambling, indirect passives, and wanna contraction.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 45-46.

 

Penke, Martina.

Unpruned trees in German Broca's aphasia.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 46-47.

 

Pickering, Martin J.

No evidence for traces in sentence comprehension.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 47-48.

 

Piñango, Maria Mercedes.

On the proper generalization for Broca's aphasia comprehension pattern: Why argument movement may not be at the source of the Broca's deficit.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 48-49.

 

Previc, Fred H.

From Broca's aphasia to the language module: A transformation too large?
BBS
2000 23 (1): 49-50.

 

Schaeffer, Jeannette.

Aphasia research and theoretical linguistics guiding each other.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 50-51.

 

Stowe, Laurie A.

Sentence comprehension and the left inferior frontal gyrus: Storage, not computation.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 51-51.

 

Szelag, Elzbieta, Pöppel, Ernst.

Temporal perception: A key to understanding language.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 52-52.

 

Ullman, Michael T., Izvorski, Roumyana.

What is special about Broca's area?
BBS
2000 23 (1): 52-54.

 

Young, M. Cherilyn, Hutchinson, Judith A.

The need to consider additional variables when summarizing agrammatism research.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 54-54.

 

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

 

Grodzinsky, Yosef.

The Trace Deletion Hypothesis and the Tree-Pruning Hypothesis: Still valid characterizations of Broca's aphasia.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 55-64.

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Nevin, John A., Grace, Randolph C.

Behavioral momentum and the Law of Effect.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 73-90.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Aparicio, Carlos F.

The stimulus-reinforcer hypothesis of behavioral momentum: Some methodological considerations.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 90-91.

 

Baum, William M., Mitchell, Suzanne H.

Newton and Darwin: Can this marriage be saved?
BBS
2000 23 (1): 91-92.

 

Branch, Marc N.

Gaining (on) momentum.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 92-93.

 

Case, David A.

To augment yet not contradict.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 93-94.

 

Catania, A. Charles.

Metaphors, models, and mathematics in the science of behavior.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 94-95.

 

Cohen, Steven L.

Behavioral momentum: Issues of generality.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 95-96.

 

Fantino, Edmund.

The role of context in choice.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 96-97.

 

Galbicka, Gregory, Kessel, Robert.

Experimenter momentum and the effect of laws.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 97-98.

 

Gardner, R. Allen, Scheel, Matthew H.

Momentum feeds forward.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 98-99.

 

Hall, Scott.

Amassing the masses.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 99-100.

 

Harper, David.

Problems with the concept of force in the momentum metaphor.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 100-100.

 

Higgins, Stephen T., Sigmon, Stacey C.

Implications of behavioral momentum for understanding the behavioral pharmacology of abused drugs.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 101-101.

 

Killeen, Peter R.

A passel of metaphors: “Some old, some new, some borrowed . . .”
BBS
2000 23 (1): 102-103.

 

Leslie, Julian C.

Does conditioned suppression measure the resistance to change of operant behaviour?
BBS
2000 23 (1): 103-104.

 

Logue, A.W.

Self-control's momentum outside of the laboratory.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 104-105.

 

Mace, F. Charles.

Clinical applications of behavioral momentum.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 105-106.

 

Mandell, Charlotte.

The partial reinforcement effect and behavioral momentum: Reconcilable?
BBS
2000 23 (1): 106-107.

 

Marr, Jack.

Happiest thought: Dynamics and behavior.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 107-108.

 

Mazur, James E.

Contextual choice and other models of preference.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 108-109.

 

McIlvane, William J., Dube, William V.

Behavioral momentum and multiple stimulus control topographies.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 109-109.

 

Rachlin, Howard.

Two cheers for behavioral momentum.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 110-111.

 

Read, Daniel.

Can the concept of behavioural mass help explain nonconstant time discounting?
BBS
2000 23 (1): 111-111.

 

Shimp, Charles P.

Toward a deconstruction of the metaphor of behavioral momentum.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 111-112.

 

Takahashi, Masaharu.

Preference and resistance to change do not always covary.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 112-113.

 

Tonneau, François.

Strength, limits, and resistance to change of operant theory.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 113-114.

 

Vuchinich, Rudy E.

Behavioral momentum and behavioral economic metaphors for excessive consumption.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 114-115.

 

White, K. Geoffrey, Cameron, Judy.

Resistance to change, contrast, and intrinsic motivation.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 115-116.

 

Williams, Ben A., Bell, Matthew C.

The uncertain domain of resistance to change.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 116-117.

 

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

 

Nevin, John A., Grace, Randolph C.

Behavioral momentum: Empirical, theoretical, and metaphorical issues.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 117-125.

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Laland, Kevin N., Odling-Smee, John, Feldman, Marcus W.

Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 131-146.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Adenzato, Mauro.

Gene-culture coevolution does not replace standard evolutionary theory.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 146-146.

 

Aunger, Robert.

Phenogenotypes break up under countervailing evolutionary pressures.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 147-147.

 

Barkow, Jerome H.

Our shared species-typical evolutionary psychology.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 148-148.

 

Bowles, Samuel.

Economic institutions as ecological niches.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 148-149.

 

Broude, Gwen J.

Can niche-construction theory live in harmony with human equipotentiality?
BBS
2000 23 (1): 149-150.

 

Bullock, Seth, Noble, Jason.

Evolutionary simulation modelling clarifies interactions between parallel adaptive processes.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 150-151.

 

Colarelli, Stephen M.

Evolution, the criterion problem, and complexity.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 151-152.

 

Gabora, Liane.

The interwoven conceptual matrix of the cultural replicator.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 152-153.

 

Gauvin, Mary.

Niche construction, social co-construction, and the development of the human mind.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 153-153.

 

Godfrey-Smith, Peter.

Niche construction in biological and philosophical theories.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 153-154.

 

King, Barbara J.

Another frame shift: From cultural transmission to cultural co-construction.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 154-155.

 

Lipp, H.-P.

Big brains as shelters for odd genes: How fast does complex behavior evolve?
BBS
2000 23 (1): 155-156.

 

Pocklington, Richard.

Selection: Units, modes, and levels.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 156-157.

 

Robson Brown, Kate.

The meaning of hominid species – culture as process and product?
BBS
2000 23 (1): 157-157.

 

Russell, P.A., Carey, D.P.

Niche construction at the “workface” of the human behavioural sciences.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 158-158.

 

Saidel, Eric.

The compound interest effect: Why cultural evolution is not niche construction.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 158-159.

 

Simonton, Dean Keith.

Human creativity, cultural evolution, and niche construction.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 159-160.

 

Sternberg, Robert J.

An evolutionary interpretation of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom: A link between the evolution of organisms and the evolution of ideas.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 160-161.

 

Thompson, Nicholas S.

Niche construction and group selection.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 161-162.

 

Townsend, John Marshall.

Adaptation and intracultural variation.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 162-162.

 

van der Steen, Wim J.

Niche construction: A pervasive force in evolution?
BBS
2000 23 (1): 162-163.

 

Wilson, David Sloan.

The challenge of understanding complexity.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 163-164.

 

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

 

Laland, Kevin N., Odling-Smee, John, Feldman, Marcus W.

Niche construction earns its keep.
BBS
2000 23 (1): 164-172.

 

Volume 23 – Issue 02 – April 2000

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Rolls, Edmund T.

Précis of The brain and emotion.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 177-191

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Adolphs, Ralph.

Is reward an emotion?
BBS
2000 23 (2): 192-192.

 

Aydede, Murat.

Emotions or emotional feelings?
BBS
2000 23 (2): 192-194.

 

Ben-Ze’ev, Aaron.

Are emotions so simple?
BBS
2000 23 (2): 194-194.

 

Bermúdez, José Luis.

Consciousness, higher-order thought, and stimulus reinforcement.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 194-195.

 

Buck, Ross.

Conceptualizing motivation and emotion.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 195-196.

 

Dalgleish, Tim.

Roads not taken: The case for multiple functional-level routes to emotion.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 196-197.

 

DeLancey, Craig.

Affect programs, intentionality, and consciousness.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 197-198.

 

Fentress, John C.

Emotional networks: The heart of brain design.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 198-199.

 

Frijda, Nico H.

Emotion theory?
BBS
2000 23 (2): 199-200.

 

Grafman, Jordan.

Structuring an emotional world.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 200-201.

 

Houston, Alasdair I., McNamara, John M.

Adaptive accounts of physiology and emotion.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 201-202.

 

Izard, Carroll.

Reinforcement, emotion, and consciousness.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 202-204.

 

Katz, Leonard.

Emotion, representation, and consciousness.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 204-205.

 

Killcross, Simon.

Reinforcement and punishment: Dissociable systems for action and emotion?
BBS
2000 23 (2): 205-205.

 

Korb, Kevin B., Nicholson, Ann E.

The essential roles of emotion in cognitive architecture.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 205-206.

 

Kralik, Jerald D., Hauser, Marc D.

A taste of things to come.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 207-208.

 

Kupfermann, Irving.

Reward: Wanted – a better definition.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 208-208.

 

Laming, Donald R.J.

On the behavioural interpretation of neurophysiological observation.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 209-209.

 

Mac Aogáin, Eoghan.

Emotion, cognition, and free representation.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 210-210.

 

Mogi, Eucaly.

Intelligence and emotion.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 210-211.

 

Moore, Simon C., Oaksford, Mike.

Is what you feel what you don't know?
BBS
2000 23 (2): 211-212.

 

Panksepp, Jaak.

Neural behaviorism: From brain evolution to human emotion at the speed of an action potential.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 212-213.

 

Parker, Amanda.

The amygdala – responsible for memories of reward as well as punishment?
BBS
2000 23 (2): 213-214.

 

Peterson, Jordan B.

Awareness may be existence as well as (higher-order) thought.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 214-215.

 

Ramsay, Jason T., Lewis, Marc D.

The causal status of emotions in consciousness.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 215-216.

 

Salzen, Eric A.

Affect systems and neural systems.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 216-217.

 

Ursi, Holger.

Emotions and reward – but no arousal?
BBS
2000 23 (2): 217-218.

 

Van Gulick, Robert.

Is the higher order of linguistic thought model of feeling adequate?
BBS
2000 23 (2): 218-219.

 

Wilson, David Sloan.

Innate psychology and open-ended processes: Finding the middle ground.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 219-219.

 

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

 

Rolls, Edmund T.

On The brain and emotion.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 219-228.

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Domjan, Michael, Cusato, Brian, Villarreal, Ronald.

Pavlovian feed-forward mechanisms in the control of social behavior.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 235-249.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Baldwin, John D.

Let's go all the way – and include operant and observational learning.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 249-250.

 

Bekoff, Marc, Allen, Colin.

Social play is more than a Pavlovian romp.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 250-251.

 

Bronstein, Paul M.

Ecological heuristics for learning.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 251-251.

 

Cardinal, Claudia D., Andrzejewski, Matthew E., Hineline, Philip N.

Is the avoiding of operant theory a Pavlovian conditioned response?
BBS
2000 23 (2): 252-253.

 

Coleman, S.R.

Adaptiveness, law-of-effect theory, and control-system theory.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 253-253.

 

Davey, Graham C.L., Field, Andy P.

The “benefit” of Pavlovian conditioning – performance models, hidden costs, and innovation.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 253-254.

 

Fantino, Edmund, Stolarz-Fantino, Stephanie.

Fish displaying and infants sucking: The operant side of the social behavior coin.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 254-255.

 

Fragaszy, Dorothy M.

Extending the model: Pavlovian social learning.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 255-256.

 

Gardner, R. Allen.

Feeding forward versus feeding backward.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 256-257.

 

Goodie, Adam S.

The breadth-depth tradeoff: Gains and losses as the unidirectional shift in Pavlovian conditioning continues.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 257-258.

 

Hollis, Karen L.

Strategies for integrating biological theory, control systems theory, and Pavlovian conditioning.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 258-259.

 

Killeen, Peter R.

Boxing Day.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 259-260.

 

Krebs, Dennis.

On levels of analysis and theoretical integration: Models of social behavior.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 260-261.

 

Limber, John.

It is time to inhibit Pavlovian conditioning.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 261-261.

 

Poirier, Frank E., Field, Michelle.

Pavlovian perceptions and primate realities.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 262-262.

 

Rowland, William J.

Pavlovian conditioning as a product of selection.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 262-263.

 

Schuster, Richard.

How useful is an individual perspective for explaining the control of social behavior?
BBS
2000 23 (2): 263-264.

 

Siviy, Stephen M.

It still takes at least two to tango.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 264-265.

 

Slobodchikoff, C.N.

Feed-forward and the evolution of social behavior.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 265-266.

 

Snowdon, Charles T.

Bottoms-up! A refreshing change in models.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 266-267.

 

Steinmetz, Joseph E., Britton, Gabrielle B., Green, John T.

How is the feed-forward Pavlovian control system instantiated in neurobiology?
BBS
2000 23 (2): 267-267.

 

Timberlake, William, Pecoraro, Norman, Tinsley, Matthew.

An integrative approach to the modeling of behavior.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 268-268.

 

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

 

Domjan, Michael, Cusato, Brian, Villarreal, Ronald.

Extensions, elaborations, and explanations of the role of evolution and learning in the control of social behavior.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 269-276.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Johnson-Laird, P.N., Byrne, R.M.J.

Précis of Deduction.

BBS 1993 16: 323-380.

 

van der Henst, Jean-Baptiste.

Mental model theory and pragmatics.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 283-284.

 

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

 

Johnson-Laird, P.N., Byrne, Ruth M.J.

Mental models and pragmatics.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 284-285.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Shors, T.J., Matzel, L.D.

Long-term potentiation: What’s learning got to do with it?

BBS 1997 20: 597-655.

 

Jeffery, Kathryn J.

LTP – A mechanism in search of a function.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 286-287.

 

Zhadin, Mikhail N.

LTP and reinforcement: Possible role of the monoaminergic systems.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 287-288.

 

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

 

Shors, Tracey J., Matzel, Louis D.

The status of LTP as a mechanism of memory formation in the mammalian brain.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 288-290.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Chow, S.L.

Précis of Statistical significance: rationale, validity, and utility.

BBS 1998 21: 169-239.

 

Haig, Brian D.

Statistical significance testing, hypothetico-deductive method, and theory evaluation.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 292-293.

 

Sohn, David.

Does the finding of statistical significance justify the rejection of the null hypothesis?
BBS
2000 23 (2): 293-294.

 

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

 

Chow, Siu L.

The Popperian framework, statistical significance, and rejection of chance.
BBS
2000 23 (2): 294-298.

 

Volume 23 – Issue 03 – June 2000

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Norris, Dennis, McQueen, James M., Cutler, Anne.

Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 299-325.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Appelbaum, Irene.

Merging information versus speech recognition.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 325-326.

 

Benkí, José R.

Lexical biases are useful.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 326-327.

 

Brancazio, Lawrence, Fowler, Carol A.

Merging auditory and visual phonetic information: A critical test for feedback?
BBS
2000 23 (3): 327-328.

 

Connine, Cynthia M., LoCasto, Paul C.

Inhibition.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 328-328.

 

Doeleman, Tobey L., Sereno, Joan A., Jongman, Allard, Sereno, Sara C.

Features and feedback.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 328-329.

 

Gaskell, M. Gareth.

Modeling lexical effects on phonetic categorization and semantic effects on word recognition.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 329-330.

 

Gow, David W.

One phonemic representation should suffice.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 331-331.

 

Grainger, Jonathan.

The trouble with Merge: Modeling speeded target detection.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 331-332.

 

Grossberg, Stephen.

Brain feedback and adaptive resonance in speech perception.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 332-333.

 

Isel, Frédéric.

What sort of model could account for an early autonomy and a late interaction revealed by ERPs?
BBS
2000 23 (3): 333-334.

 

Jusczyk, Peter W., Johnson, Elizabeth K.

Some implications from language development for merge.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 334-335.

 

Kingston, John.

Most but not all bottom-up interactions between signal properties improve categorization.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 335-336.

 

Luce, Paul A., Goldinger, Stephen D., Vitevitch, Michael S.

It's good . . . but is it ART?
BBS
2000 23 (3): 336-336.

 

Marslen-Wilson, William D.

What phonetic decision making does not tell us about lexical architecture.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 337-338.

 

Massaro, Dominic W.

The horse race to language understanding: FLMP was first out of the gate, and has yet to be overtaken.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 338-339.

 

Meyer, Antje S., Levelt, Willem J.M.

Merging speech perception and production.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 339-340.

 

Montant, Marie.

Feedback: A general mechanism in the brain.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 340-341.

 

Murray, Wayne S.

Interaction versus autonomy: A close shave.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 341-342.

 

Nearey, Terrance M.

Some concerns about the phoneme-like inputs to Merge.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 342-343.

 

Newman, Rochelle S.

Not all neighborhood effects are created equal.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 343-343.

 

Oden, Gregg C.

Implausibility versus misinterpretation of the FLMP.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 344-344.

 

Pitt, Mark.

Model evaluation and data interpretation.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 344-345.

 

Samuel, Arthur G.

Merge: Contorted architecture, distorted facts, and purported autonomy.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 345-346.

 

Shillcock, Richard.

Interaction, function words, and the wider goals of speech perception.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 346-346.

 

Slowiaczek, Louisa M.

Hesitations and clarifications on a model to abandon feedback.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 347-347.

 

Stevens, Kenneth N.

Recognition of continuous speech requires top-down processing.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 348-348.

 

Tanenhaus, Michael K., Magnuson, James S., McMurray, Bob, Aslin, Richard N.

No compelling evidence against feedback in spoken word recognition.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 348-349.

 

Vroomen, Jean, de Gelder, Beatrice.

Why not model spoken word recognition instead of phoneme monitoring?
BBS
2000 23 (3): 349-350.

 

Warren, Richard M.

Phonemic organization does not occur: Hence no feedback.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 350-351.

 

Whalen, D.H.

Occam's razor is a double-edged sword: Reduced interaction is not necessarily reduced power.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 351-351.

 

Ziegler, Johannes C., Van Orden, Gay C.

Feedback consistency effects.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 351-352.

 

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

 

Norris, Dennis, McQueen, James M., Cutler, Anne.

Feedback on feedback on feedback: It's feedforward.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 352-363.

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Nunez, Paul L.

Toward a quantitative description of large-scale neocortical dynamic function and EEG.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 371-398.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Andrew, Colin.

Sensorimotor EEG rhythms and their connection to local/global neocortical dynamic theory.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 399-400.

 

Daffertshofer, A., Frank, T.D., Peper, C.E., Beek, P.J.

Three pertinent issues in the modeling of brain activity: Nonlinearities, time scales, and neural underpinnings.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 400-401.

 

Freeman, Walter J., Kozma, Robert.

Local-global interactions and the role of mesoscopic (intermediate-range) elements in brain dynamics.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 401-401.

 

Greenblatt, Richard E.

Large-scale neocortical dynamics: Some EEG data analysis implications.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 401-402.

 

Habeck, Christian G., Srinivasan, Ramesh.

Natural solutions to the problem of functional integration.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 402-403.

 

Ingber, Lester.

Statistical mechanics of neocortical interactions: EEG eigenfunctions of short-term memory.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 403-405.

 

Jirsa, V.K., Kelso, J.A.S.

Beyond the limits of the brain as a physical system.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 405-406.

 

Keil, Andreas, Elbert, Thomas.

Physiological units and behavioral elements: Dynamic brains relate to dynamic behavior.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 406-407.

 

Kolev, V., Yordanova, J.

The position of event-related EEG activity in the local/global theory.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 407-407.

 

Liley, David T.J.

Local and global dynamical control parameters are not so easily separated.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 407-408.

 

Liljenström, Hans.

Interscale interactions in cortical neural networks.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 408-409.

 

Mayer-Kress, Gottfried.

From metaphors to equations: How can we find the good ones?
BBS
2000 23 (3): 409-410.

 

Murias, Michael, Swanson, James M.

Large-scale neocortical dynamic function and EEG: Use of theory and methods in clinical research on children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 411-411.

 

Pflieger, Mark E.

Brain function theories, EEG sources, and dynamic states.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 411-412.

 

Thatcher, R.W., Gomez-Molina, J.F., Biver, C., North, D., Curtin, R., Walker, R.W.

Two compartmental models of EEG coherence and MRI biophysics.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 412-412.

 

Tucker, Don M.

Real brain waves.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 412-413.

 

von Stein, Astrid, Sarnthein, Johannes.

EEG frequency and the size of cognitive neuronal assemblies.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 413-414.

 

Wright, J.J.

Developing testable theories of brain dynamics: The global mode theory and experimental falsification.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 414-415.

 

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

 

Nunez, Paul L.

Neocortical dynamic theory should be as simple as possible, but not simpler.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 415-432.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on MacNeilage, P.F.

The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production.

BBS 1998 21: 499-546.

 

Joseph, R.

The limbic language/language axis theory of speech.
BBS
2000 23 (3): 439-440.

 

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

 

MacNeilage, Peter F.

The explana