Volume 21 – Issue 01 – February 1998

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Schyns, P.G., Goldstone, R.L., Thibaut, J.-P.

The development of features in object concepts.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 1-17.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Abdi, H., Valentin, D., Edelman, B.G.
Eigenfeatures as intermediate-level representations: The case for PCA models.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 17-18.

 

Benson, P.J.

Feature see, feature do.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 18-19.

 

Braisby, N., Franks, B.

A creationist myth: Pragmatic combination not feature creation.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 19-20.

 

Brooks, L.R.

The development of new functional features by instruction: The case of medical education.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 20-21.

 

Burgund, E.D., Marsolek, C.J.

Fixed versus flexible features in dissociable neural processing subsystems.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 21-22.

 

Cleeremans, A.

The other hard problem: How to bridge the gap between symbolic and subsymbolic cognition.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 22-23.

 

Deák, G.

Flexible feature creation: Child's play?

BBS 1998 21 (1): 23-23.

 

Dominey, P.F.

Flexible categorization requires the creation of relational features.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 23-24.

 

Dorffner, G.

Flexible features, connectionism, and computational learning theory.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 24-25.

 

Edelman, S.

Things are what they seem.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 25-25.

 

French, R.M., Weaver, M.

New-feature learning: How common is it?

BBS 1998 21 (1): 26-26.

 

Gauker, C.

Building block dilemmas

BBS 1998 21 (1): 26-27.

 

Grossberg, S.

Self-organizing features and categories through attentive resonance.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 27-28.

 

Hahn, U., Chater, N.

Real-world categories don't allow uniform feature spaces – not just across categories but within categories also.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 28-28.

 

Huettel, S.A., Lockhead, G.R.

A framework for structural constraints on feature creation.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 29-29.

 

Hummel, J.E., Kellman, P.J.

Finding the Pope in the pizza: Abstract invariants and cognitive constraints on perceptual learning.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 30-30.

 

Lamberts, K.

Can features be created on the fly?

BBS 1998 21 (1): 30-31.

 

Latimer, C.R.

New features for old: Creation or derivation?

BBS 1998 21 (1): 31-32.

 

MacDorman, K.F.

Feature learning, multiresolution analysis, and symbol grounding.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 32-32.

 

Perruchet, P., Vinter, A.

Feature creation as a byproduct of attentional processing

BBS 1998 21 (1): 33-34.

 

Phillips, W. A.

Context-dependent feature discovery is evidence that the coordination of function is a basic cognitive capacity

BBS 1998 21 (1): 34-35.

 

Quinn, P.C.

Emergence of object representations in young infants: Corroborating findings and a challenge for the feature creation approach.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 35-36.

 

Singh, M., Landau, B.

Parts of visual shape as primitives for categorization.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 36-37.

 

Tanaka, J.

Parts, features, and expertise.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 37-38.

 

Tijsseling, A.

Do features arise out of nothing?

BBS 1998 21 (1): 38-39.

 

Wiemer-Hastings, K., Graesser, A.C.

Who needs created features?

BBS 1998 21 (1): 39-39.

 

Williams, P., Gauthier, I., Tarr, M.J.
Feature learning during the acquisition of perceptual expertise

BBS 1998 21 (1): 40-41.

 

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

 

Schyns, P.G., Goldstone, R.L., Thibaut, J.-P.

Ways of featuring in object categorization

BBS 1998 21 (1): 41-54.

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Millikan, R.G.

A common structure for concepts of individuals, stuffs, and real kinds: More Mama, more milk, and more mouse.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 55-65.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Allen, C.

Animal concepts.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 66-66.

 

Bloom, P.

Different structures for concepts of individuals, stuffs, and real kinds: One Mama, more milk, and many mice.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 66-67.

 

Boyer, P.

If “tracking” is category-specific a “common structure” may be redundant.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 67-68.

 

Cangelosi, A., Parisi, D.

Concepts in artificial organisms.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 68-69.

 

Carlson, G.

Names, and what they are names of.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 69-70.

 

Franks, B., Braisby, N.

What is the point? Concepts, description, and rigid designation.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 70-70.

 

Gauker, C.

Are there wordlike concepts too?

BBS 1998 21 (1): 70-71.

 

Gendler, T.S.

Why language is not a “direct medium.”

BBS 1998 21 (1): 71-72.

 

Ghiselin, M.T.

Etiological classification and the acquisition and structure of knowledge.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 72-73.

 

Gopnik, A.

What can externalism do for psychologists?

BBS 1998 21 (1): 73-74.

 

Hampton, J.A.

Staying in touch: Externalism needs descriptions.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 74-74.

 

Hauser, M.D., Fitch, W.T.

Reidentification and redescription.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 74-74.

 

Keil, F.

The most basic units of thought do more, and less, than point.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 75-76.

 

Komatsu, L.K.

Mapping Millikan's conceptual work onto (empirical) work by psychologists.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 76-77.

 

Livingston, K.R.

Concept acquisition and use occurs in (real) context.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 77-78.

 

MacLennan, B.J.

Finding order in our world: The primacy of the concrete in neural representations and the role of invariance in substance reidentification.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 78-79.

 

Mandler, J.M.

Whatever happened to meaning?

BBS 1998 21 (1): 79-80.

 

Müller, V.C., Kelter, S.

Too much substance, not enough cognition.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 80-80.

 

Murphy, G.L.

Extensional assumptions in theories of meaning and concepts.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 80-81.

 

Nelson, K.

Beyond substance concepts in cognitive development.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 81-82.

 

Perner, J.

Room for concept development?

BBS 1998 21 (1): 82-83.

 

Scharer, N.

Can mere phonemes be components of Millikan's substance concepts?

BBS 1998 21 (1): 83-84.

 

Schröder, J.

Explanatory force, antidescriptionism, and the common structure of substance concepts.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 84-85.

 

Slater, C.

More me? Substance concepts and self concepts.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 85-85.

 

ter Meulen, A.G.B.

Semantic realism, rigid designation, and dynamic semantics.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 85-86.

 

van Brake, J.

A white thing.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 86-88.

 

Waxman, S., Thompson, W.

Words are invitations to learn about categories.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 88-88.

 

Xu, F., Tenenbaum, J.B., Sorrentino, C.M.

Concepts are not beliefs, but having concepts is having beliefs.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 89-89.

 

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

 

Millikan. R.G.

Words, concepts, and entities: With enemies like these, I don't need friends.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 89-100.

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Heyes, C. M.

Theory of mind in nonhuman primates
BBS 1998 21 (1): 101-114.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Bard, K.A.

Imitation and mirror self-recognition may be developmental precursors to theory of mind in human and nonhuman primates.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 115-115.

 

Baum, W.M.

Why not ask “Does the chimpanzee have a soul?”

BBS 1998 21 (1): 116-116.

 

Byrne, R.W.

So much easier to attack straw men.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 116-117.

 

Csibra, G.

Seeing is not believing.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 117-118.

 

Custance, D.

Apes ape!

BBS 1998 21 (1): 118-119.

 

Gallup, G.G.

Mirrors and radical behaviorism: Reflections on C. M. Heyes

BBS 1998 21 (1): 119-119.

 

Gómez, J.C.

Assessing theory of mind with nonverbal procedures: Problems with training methods and an alternative “key” procedure.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 119-120.

 

Gordon, R.M.

The prior question: Do human primates have a theory of mind?

BBS 1998 21 (1): 120-121.

 

Gray, C., Russell, P.

Theory of mind in nonhuman primates: A question of language?

BBS 1998 21 (1): 121-121.

 

Green, S.M., Wilson, D.L., Evans, S.

Anecdotes, omniscience, and associative learning in examining the theory of mind.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 122-122.

 

Kamawar, D., Olson, D.R.

Theory of mind in young human primates: Does Heyes's task measure it?

BBS 1998 21 (1): 122-123.

 

Leavens, D.A.

Having a concept “see” does not imply attribution of knowledge: Some general considerations in measuring “theories of mind.”

BBS 1998 21 (1): 123-124.

 

Matheson, M. D., Cooper, M., Weeks, J., Thompson, R., Fragaszy, D.

Attribution is more likely to be demonstrated in more natural contexts.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 124-126.

 

Miles, H.L., Roberts, W.P.

Methodologies, not method, for primate theory of mind.

126-127.

 

Mitchell, R.W., Anderson, J.R.

Primate theory of mind is a Turing test.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 127-128.

 

Parker, A.

Primate cognitive neuroscience: What are the useful questions?
BBS 1998 21 (1): 128-128.

 

Pepperberg, I.M.

To see or not to see, that is the question: Designing experiments to test perspective-taking in nonhumans.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 128-129.

 

Purdy, J.E., Domjan, M.

Tactics in theory of mind research.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 129-130.

 

Slaughter, V., Mealey, L.

Seeing is not (necessarily) believing.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 130-130.

 

Suddendorf, T.

Simpler for evolution: Secondary representation in apes, children, and ancestors.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 131-131.

 

Walker, S.F.

Precursors to theories of mind in nonhuman brains.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 131-132.

 

Whiten, A.

Triangulation, intervening variables, and experience projection.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 132-133.

 

Zentall, T.R.

What can we learn from the absence of evidence?

BBS 1998 21 (1): 133-134.

 

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

 

Heyes, C.M.

Liberalism, chauvinism, and experimental thought.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 134-148.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Verleger, R.

Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hyptothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3.

BBS 1988 11: 343-427.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Donchin, E., Coles, M.G.H.

Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?

BBS 1988 11: 357-374.

 

Sommer, W., Leuthold, H., Matt, J.

The expectancies that govern the P300 amplitude are mostly automatic and unconscious.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 149-150.

 

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

 

Verleger, R.

Toward an integration of P3 research with cognitive neuroscience.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 150-152.

 

Donchin, E., Coles, M.G.H.

Context updating and the P300.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 152-154.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Greenfield, P.M.

Language, tools and brain: The ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior.

BBS 1991 14: 531-595.

 

Givon, T.

Toward a neurology of grammar.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 154-155.

 

Swann, P.

Greenfield on language, tools, and brain.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 155-159.

 

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

 

Greenfield, P.M.

Language, tools, and brain revisited

BBS 1998 21 (1): 159-163.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M.

Memory metaphors and the real-life/laboratory controversy: Correspondence versus storehouse conceptions of memory.

BBS 1996

 

Cohen, G.

Measuring accuracy is an intractable problem.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 164-164.

 

Shanon, B.

Metaphorical pluralism – not on the substantive level!

BBS 1998 21 (1): 164-165.

 

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

 

Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M.

Methodological and substantive implications of a metatheoretical distinction: More on correspondence versus storehouse metaphors of memory.

BBS 1998 21 (1): 165-168.

 

Volume 21 – Issue 02 – April 1998

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Chow, Siu L.

Précis of Statistical significance: Rationale, validity, and utility.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 169-194.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Blaich, Charles F.
The null-hypothesis significance-test procedure: Can't live with it, can't live without it.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 194-195.

Boklage, Charles E.

On the position of statistical significance in the epistemology of experimental science.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 195-195.

Bookstein, Fred L.
Statistical significance testing was not meant for weak corroborations of weaker theories.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 195-196.

Dar, Reuven.

Null hypothesis tests and theory corroboration: Defending NHSTP out of context.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 196-197.

Erwin, Edward.
The logic of null hypothesis testing.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 197-198.

Frick, Robert W.
Chow's defense of null-hypothesis testing: Too traditional?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 199-199.

Gigerenzer, Gerd.
We need statistical thinking, not statistical rituals.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 199-200.

Gluck, Judith, Vitouch, Oliver.
Stranded statistical paradigms: The last crusade.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 200-201.

Gregson, Robert A.M.
Understanding Bayesian procedures.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 201-202.

Harris, Richard J.

“With friends like this . . .”: Three flaws in Chow's defense of significance testing.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 202-203.

Hayes, Andrew F.
Reconnecting data analysis and research design: Who needs a confidence interval?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 203-204.

Hunter, John E.

Testing significance testing: A flawed defense.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 204-204.

Kihlstrom, John F.
If you've got an effect, test its significance; if you've got a weak effect, do a meta-analysis.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 205-206.

Kraemer, Helena Chmura.

Statistical significance: A statistician's view.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 206-207.

Krueger, Lester E.
The Ego has landed! The .05 level of statistical significance is soft (Fisher) rather than hard (Neyman/Pearson).
BBS 1998 21 (2): 207-208.

Kyburg, Henry E.
Logic and the foundations of statistical inference.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 208-209.

Lashley, Brian R.
A defense of statistical power analysis.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 209-210.

Lewandowsky, Stephan, Maybery, Murray.
The critics rebutted: A Pyrrhic victory.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 210-211.

Maher, Brendan.
When the coefficient hits the clinic: Effect size and the size of the effect.

BBS 1998 21 (2): 211-211.

 

Mayo, Deborah G.

Some problems with Chow's problems with power.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 212-213.

Nester, Marks R.
Significance tests cannot be justified in theory-corroboration experiments.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 213-213.

Palm, Günther.

Significance testing – does it need this defence?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 214-215.

Poitevineau, Jacques, Lecoutre, Bruno.
Some statistical misconceptions in Chow's Statistical significance.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 215-215.

Rindskopf, David.

Null-hypothesis tests are not completely stupid, but Bayesian statistics are better.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 215-216.

Rossi, Joseph S.
Meta-analysis, power analysis, and the null-hypothesis significance-test procedure.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 216-217.

Rouanet, Henry.
Significance testing in a Bayesian framework: Assessing direction of effects.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 217-218.

Shafto, Michael G.
Costs and benefits of statistical significance tests.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 218-219.

Snow, Paul.
Inductive strategy and statistical tactics.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 219-219.

Stam, Henderikus J., Pasay, Grant A.
The historical case against null-hypothesis significance testing.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 219-220.

Swijtink, Zeno G.

A plea for Popperian significance testing.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 220-221.

Tassinary, Louis G.
Significance tests: Necessary but not sufficient.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 221-222.

Thyer, Bruce A.

On various methods of reporting variance.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 222-223.

Verplanck, William S.
Statistical inference: Why wheels spin.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 223-224.

Vicente, Kim J.

Four reasons why the science of psychology is still in trouble.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 224-225.

Vokey, John R.
Statistics without probability: Significance testing as typicality and exchangeability in data analysis.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 225-226.

Waller, Niels G., Johnson, Wesley O.
The non-significance of straw man arguments.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 226-227.

Zumbo, Bruno D.
A viable alternative to null-hypothesis testing.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 227-228.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Chow, Siu L.
The null-hypothesis significance-test procedure is still warranted.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 228-235.

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Sussman, Harvey M., Fruchter, David, Hilbert, Jon, Sirosh, Joseph.
Linear correlates in the speech signal: The orderly output constraint.

BBS 1998 21 (2): 241-259.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Blumstein, Sheila E.

The mapping from acoustic structure to the phonetic categories of speech: The invariance problem.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 260-260.

Brancazio, Lawrence.
Does locus-equation linearity really matter in consonant perception?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 261-261.

Carré, René.

Linear correlates in the speech signal: Consequences of the specific use of an acoustic tube?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 261-262.

Damper, R.I.
Self-learning and self-organization as tools for speech research.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 262-263.

Deng, Li.

Locus equation and hidden parameters of speech.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 263-264.

Diehl, Randy L.
Locus equations: A partial solution to the problem of consonant place perception.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 264-264.

Fitch, W. Tecumseh, Hauser, Marc D.
Differences that make a difference: Do locus equations result from physical principles characterizing all mammalian vocal tracts?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 264-265.

Fowler, Carol A.
The orderly output constraint is not wearing any clothes.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 265-266.

Govindarajan, Krishna.
Listeners' perceptual mapping of locus equations and variability.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 266-267

Greenberg, Steven.
In search of the unicorn: Where is the invariance in speech?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 267-268.

Guenther, Frank H.

An account of the locus equation phenomenon based on speech movement planning.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 268-269.

Herrnberger, Bärbel, Ehret, Günter.
Linearity or separability?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 269-270.

Idsardi, William J.

A phonological perspective on locus equations.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 270-271.

Jongman, Allard.
Are locus equations sufficient or necessary for obstruent perception?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 271-272.

Kanwal, Jagmeet S.

Charting speech with bats without requiring maps.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 272-273.

Kluender, Keith R.
Locus equations reveal learnability.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 273-274.

Lindblom, Björn.
An articulatory perspective on the locus equation.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 274-275.

Massaro, Dominic W.
Integrating cues in speech perception.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 275-275.

Mattingly, Ignatius G.
Why did coarticulation evolve?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 275-276.

Moore, David R., King, Andrew J.
What can auditory neuroethology tell us about speech processing?

BBS 1998 21 (2): 276-277.

 

Nearey, Terrance M.

Locus equations and pattern recognition.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 277-277.

Ohl, Frank W., Scheich, Henning.
Feature extraction and feature interaction.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 278-278.

Pastore, Richard E., Crawley, Edward J.

Locus equation: Assumption and dependencies.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 278-279.

Pind, Jörgen.
Merits of a Gibsonian approach to speech perception.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 279-280.

Protopapas, Athanassios, Tallal, Paula.

On the ontogeny of combination-sensitive neurons in speech perception.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 280-281.

Remez, Robert E.
Listening to speech in the dark.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 281-282.

Ryan, Michael J., Kime, Nicole M., Rosenthal, Gil G.
Patterns of evolution in human speech processing and animal communication.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 282-283.

Sawusch, James R.
Acoustic correlates and perceptual cues in speech.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 283-284.

Schreiner, Christoph E.
Input limitations for cortical combination-sensitive neurons coding stop-consonants?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 284-284.

Smits, Roel.
Locus equations in models of human classification behavior.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 284-285.

Wagner, Hermann, Kautz, Dirk.

Evolutionary conservation and ontogenetic emergence of neural algorithms.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 285-286.

Wenstrup, Jeffrey J.
Combination-sensitive neurons: A flexible neural strategy for analyzing correlated elements in sounds.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 286-287.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Sussman, Harvey M., Fruchter, David, Hilbert, Jon, Sirosh, Joseph.

Human speech: A tinkerer's delight.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 287-295.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Rao, K.R., Palmer, J.

The anomaly called psi: Recent research and criticism.

BBS 1987 10: 539-551.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Alcock, J.E.

Parapsychology: Science of the anomalous or search for the soul?

BBS 1987 10: 553-643.

Glicksohn, Joseph.
The anomaly of the anomalous.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 301-302.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

 

Palmer, John.

Parapsychology, anomaly, and altered states of consciousness.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 302-303.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Alcock, James E.
Science, pseudoscience, and anomaly.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 303-303.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Wilson, D.S., Sober, E.

Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences.

BBS 1994 17: 585-654.

Thompson, Nicholas S.
Reintroducing “Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences” to BBS readers.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 304-305.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Wilson, David Sloan, Sober, Elliott.
Multilevel selection and the return of group-level functionalism.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 305-306.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Clark, A., Thornton, C.

Trading spaces: Computation, representation, and the limits of uninformed learning.

BBS 1997 20: 57-90.

Damper, R.I.
Parity still isn't a generalisation problem.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 307-308.

 

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

 

Thornton, Chris, Clark, Andy.
Reading the generalizer's mind.

BBS 1998 21 (2): 308-310.

 

Volume 21 – Issue 03 – June 1998

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Fitch, Roslyn Holly, Denenberg, Victor H.

A role for ovarian hormones in sexual differentiation of the brain.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 311-327.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Aboitiz, Francisco.
To normalize or not to normalize for overall size?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 327-328.

Baum, M.J., Tobet, S.A.

Sexual differentiation of callosal size: Hormonal mechanisms and the choice of an animal model.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 328-328.

Clarke, Stephanie.
Sex-related differences in callosal morphology and specific callosal connectivity: How far can we go?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 329-329.

Döhler, Klaus D.

More evidence for the role of estrogens in female differentiation of the brain.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 329-330.

Halpern, Diane F.
Recipe for a sexually dimorphic brain: Ingredients include ovarian and testicular hormones.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 330-331.

Hampson, Elizabeth.
Is the size of the human corpus callosum influenced by sex hormones?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 331-332.

Hines, Melissa.
Activation/organization, masculinization/feminization: What are they and how are they distinguished?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 332-333.

Holloway, Ralph L.
Relative size of the human corpus callosum redux: Statistical smoke and mirrors?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 333-335.

Hugdahl, Kenneth.
The corpus callosum: More than a passive “corpus.”
BBS 1998 21 (3): 335-335.

Juraska, Janice M.

Updates on axons in the rat corpus callosum.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 335-336.

Meyer-Bahlburg, Heino F.L.
Estrogens in human psychosexual differentiation.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 336-337.

Rogers, Lesley J.

Indirect influences of gonadal hormones on sexual differentiation.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 337-338.

Stewart, Jane.
Female and flexible?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 338-338.

Wahlsten, Douglas, Bishop, Katherine M.

Effect sizes and meta-analysis indicate no sex dimorphism in the human or rodent corpus callosum.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 338-339.

Wallen, Kim.
Ovarian influences on female development: Revolutionary or evolutionary?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 339-340.

Williams, Christina L., Sandstrom, Noah J.
Parallel or serial processes in sexual differentiation?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 340-341.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Fitch, Roslyn Holly, Denenberg, Victor H.
Default is not in the female, but in the theory.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 341-346.

TARGET ARTICLE

Mazur, Allan, Booth, Alan.
Testosterone and dominance in men.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 353-363.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Archer, John.
Problems with the concept of dominance and lack of empirical support for a testosterone–dominance link.

BBS 1998 21 (3): 363-363.

 

Brain, Paul F.

Androgens and human behaviour: A complex relationship.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 363-364.

Bribiescas, Richard G.
Testosterone and dominance: Between-population variance and male energetics.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 364-365.

Campbell, Anne, Muncer, Steven, Odber, Josie.

Primacy of organising effects of testosterone.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 365-365.

Cashdan, Elizabeth.
Why is testosterone associated with divorce in men?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 366-366.

Chambers, Kathleen C.

Target tissue sensitivity, testosterone– social environment interactions, and lattice hierarchies.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 366-367.

Christensen, Scott E., Breedlove, S. Marc.
Seductive allure of dichotomies.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 367-367.

Cohen, Dov.
Shaping, channelling, and distributing testosterone in social systems.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 367-368.

Collaer, Marcia L.
Early organizational influences and social factors: A need for further evaluation.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 368-369.

Constantino, John N.
Dominance and aggression over the life course: Timing and direction of causal influences.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 369-369.

Coren, Stanley.
Prenatal testosterone exposure, left-handedness, and high school delinquency.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 369-370.

Dabbs, James M.

Testosterone and the concept of dominance.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 370-371.

deCantazaro, Denys, Spironello, Emily.
Significance tests: Necessary but not sufficient.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 371-371.

Denenberg, Victor H.

Testosterone is non-zero, but what is its strength?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 372-372.

Flinn, Mark, Baerwald, Charles, Decker, Seamus, England, Barry.
Evolutionary functions of neuroendocrine response to social environment.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 372-374.

Foss, Jeffrey.

Testosterone and the second sex.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 374-375.

Fox, Robin.
Testosterone is not alone: Internal secretions and external behavior.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 375-376.

Grant, Valerie J.
Dominance runs deep.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 376-377.

Hines, Melissa.
Adult testosterone levels have little or no influence on dominance in men.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 377-378.

Kacelnik, Alejandro, Norris, Sasha.
Signalling via testosterone: Communicating health and vigour.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 378-378.

Kemper, Theodore D.
Fantasy, females, sexuality, and testosterone.

BBS 1998 21 (3): 378-379.

 

Kenrick, Douglas T., Barr, Alicia.

Testosterone's role in dominance, sex, and aggression: Why so controversial?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 379-380.

Mealey, Linda.
Testosterone-aggression relationship: An exemplar of interactionism.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 380-381.

Mueller, Ulrich.

Aggressiveness and dominance.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 381-382.

O’Carroll, Ronal E.
Placebo-controlled manipulations of testosterone levels and dominance.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 382-383.

Oliveira, Rui F.

Of fish and men: A comparative approach to androgens and social dominance.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 383-384.

Snowdon, Charles T.
The nurture of nature: Social, developmental, and environmental controls of aggression.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 384-385.

Steele, James.
Honour subcultures and the reciprocal model.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 385-386.

Townsend, John Marshall.
Dominance, sexual activity, and sexual emotions.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 386-386.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Booth, Alan, Mazur, Allan.
Old issues and new perspectives on testosterone research.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 386-390.

TARGET ARTICLE

Howe, Michael J.A., Davidson, Jane W., Sloboda, John A.
Innate talents: Reality or myth?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 399-407.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Baltes, Paul B.

Testing the limits of the ontogenetic sources of talent and excellence.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 407-408

Baron-Cohen, Simon.
Superiority on the Embedded Figures Test in autism and in normal males: Evidence of an “innate talent”?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 408-409.

Bronfenbrenner, Urie, Ceci, Stephen J.

Could the answer be talent?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 409-410.

Charness, Neil.
Explaining exceptional performance: Constituent abilities and touchstone phenomena.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 410-411.

Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly.

Fruitless polarities.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 411-411.

Detterman, Douglas K., Gabriel, Lynne T., Ruthsatz, Joanne M.
Absurd environmentalism.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 411-412.

Eisenberger, Robert.
Achievement: The importance of industriousness.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 412-413.

Ericsson, K. Anders.
Basic capacities can be modified or circumvented by deliberate practice: A rejection of talent accounts of expert performance.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 413-414.

Feldman, David Henry, Katzir, Tamar.
Natural talents: An argument for the extremes.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 414-414.

Freeman, Joan.
Inborn talent exists.

BBS 1998 21 (3): 415-415.

 

Gagné, Françoys.

A biased survey and interpretation of the nature–nurture literature.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 415-416.

Hatano, Giyoo.
Might we adopt the learning-related account instead of the talent account?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 416-417.

Heller, Kurt A., Ziegler, Albert.

Experience is no improvement over talent.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 417-418.

Humphreys, Lloyd G.
General intelligence is central to many forms of talent.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 418-418.

Irvine, Sidney H.

Innate talents: A psychological tautology?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 419-419.

Lehmann, Andreas C.
Historical increases in expert performance suggest large possibilities for improvement of performance without implicating innate capacities.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 419-420.

Plomin, Robert.
Genetic influence and cognitive abilities.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 420-421.

Rowe, David C.
Talent scouts, not practice scouts: Talents are real.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 421-422.

Rutter, Michael.
What can we learn from highly developed special skills?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 422-423.

Schneider, Wolfgang.
Innate talent or deliberate practice as determinants of exceptional performance: Are we asking the right question?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 423-424.

Simonton, Dean Keith.

Defining and finding talent: Data and a multiplicative model?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 424-425

Starkes, Janet, Helsen, Werner.
Practice, practice, practice – Is that all it takes?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 425-425.

Sternberg, Robert J.

If the key's not there, the light won't help.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 425-426.

Stevenson, Rosemary J.
Training quality and learning goals: Towards effective learning for all.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 426-427.

Tesch-Römer, Clemens.

Attributed talent is a powerful myth.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 427-427.

Trehub, Sandra E., Schellenberg, E. Glenn.
Cultural determinism is no better than biological determinism.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 427-428.

Vitouch, Oliver.
The rage to drink, or: Frontiers of expertise.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 428-429.

Weisberg, Robert W.
Creativity and practice.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 429-430.

Winner, Ellen.
Talent: Don't confuse necessity with sufficiency, or science with policy.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 430-431.

Zohar, Ada H.
Individual differences in some special abilities are genetically influenced.

BBS 1998 21 (3): 431-432.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Howe, Michael J.A., Davidson, Jane W., Sloboda, John A.
Natural born talents undiscovered.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 432-437.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Geary, D.C.

Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities.

BBS 1996 19: 229-284.

 

Frost, Peter.
Sex differences may indeed exist for 3-D navigational abilities: But was sexual selection responsible?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 443-444.

 

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

 

Geary, David C.
Sexual selection, the division of labor, and the evolution of sex differences.

BBS 1998 21 (3): 444-447.

 

Volume 21 – Issue 04 – August 1998

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Edelman, Shimon.

Representation is representation of similarities.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 449-467.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Andresen, David R., Marsolek, Chad J.
Chorus of k prototypes or discord of contradictory representations?
BBS 1998 21 (4): 467-468.

Benson, Philip J.

Seeing wood because of the trees? A case of failure in reverse-engineering.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 468-468.

Bonmassar, Giorgio, Schwartz, Eric L.
Representation is space-variant.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 469-470.

Eisler, Hannes.

Distal similarity, shape referents, subjective world, and redundancy.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 470-470.

Eklundh, Jan-Olof, Carlsson, Stefan.
Appearance is more than shape, illumination, and pose.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 470-471.

Földiák, Peter.
What is wrong with prototypes.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 471-472.

Goldstone, Robert L.
Objects, please remain composed.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 472-473.

Gregson, Robert A.M.
Metric assumptions are neither necessary nor sufficient to describe similarities.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 473-473.

Grossberg, Stephen.
Representations need self-organizing top-down expectations to fit a changing world.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 473-474.

Hahn, Ulrike, Chater, Nick.

The notion of distal similarity is ill defined.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 474-475.

Intrator, Nathan.
Representation of similarities and correspondence structure.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 475-475.

Jüttner, Martin.

Representation of similarities – a psychometric but not an explanatory concept for categorization.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 475-476.

Latimer, Cyril.
The Chorus scheme: Representation or isomorphism, holistic or analytic?
BBS 1998 21 (4): 476-477.

Markman, Arthur B., Yamauchi, Takashi.

Boundary conditions and the need for multiple forms of representation.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 477-478.

Palm, Guenther.
How to combine interpolation with feedback?
BBS 1998 21 (4): 478-478.

Postma, Eric, van den Herik, Jaap, Hudson, Patrick.
Attentional dynamics and a chorus of geons.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 479-479.

Sokolov, E.N.
Vector code differences and similarities.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 479-480.

Stuart, Bradley V.
Visual tasks require manipulable representations.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 480-480.

Tovée, M.J.
A neural basis for the Chorus model?

BBS 1998 21 (4): 481-481.

 

van Brakel, J.

A multiculture of veridicalities.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 481-482.

van Leeuwen, Cees.
Regular spaces versus computing with chaos.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 482-484.

Williamson, James R.

How is representation learned?
BBS 1998 21 (4): 484-484.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Edelman, Shimon.
Shape representation by Second-order Isomorphism and the Chorus model: SIC.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 484-493.

TARGET ARTICLE

 

MacNeilage, Peter F.

The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 499-511.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Abbs, James H., DePaul, Roxanne.
Motor cortex fields and speech movements: Simple dual control is implausible.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 511-512.

Abry, Christian, Boë, Louis-Jean, Laboissière, Schwartz, Jean-Luc.
A new puzzle for the evolution of speech?
BBS 1998 21 (4): 512-513.

Andrew, R.J.
Cyclicity in speech derived from call repetition rather than from intrinsic cyclicity of ingestion.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 513-514.

Bloom, Kathleen.
The missing link's missing link: Syllabic vocalizations at 3 months of age.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 514-515.

Buckingham, Hugh W.
Embodiment, muscle sense, and memory for speech.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 515-515.

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew.

The frame/content model and syntactic evolution.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 515-516.

Ghazanfar, Asif A., Katz, Donald B.
Distributed neural substrates and the evolution of speech production.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 516-517.

Goldberg, Gary, Brooks, Roberta.

Premotor systems, language-related neurodynamics, and cetacean communication.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 517-518.

Greenberg, Steven.
A syllable-centric framework for the evolution of spoken language.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 518-518.

Harley, Trevor A.

Content without a frame? The role of vocabulary biases in speech errors.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 518-519.

Jürgens, Uwe.
Speech evolved from vocalization, not mastication.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 519-520.

Levelt, Willem J.M., Schiller, Niels O.
Is the syllable frame stored?
BBS 1998 21 (4): 520-520.

Lieberman, Philip.
Speech evolution: Let barking dogs sleep.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 520-521.

Lindblom, Björn.
A curiously ubiquitous articulatory movement.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 521-522

Lund, James P.
Is speech just chewing the fat?

BBS 1998 21 (4): 522-522.

 

McCune, Lorraine.

Frame dominance: A developmental phenomenon?
BBS 1998 21 (4): 522-523.

Menn, Lise.
A multi-modal, emergent view of the development of syllables in early phonology.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 523-524.

Munhall, K.G., Jones J.A.

Articulatory evidence for syllabic structure.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 524-525.

Ohala, John J.
Content first, frame later.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 525-526.

Pepperberg, Irene M.

Out of the mouths of babes . . . and beaks of birds? A broader interpretation of the frame/content theory for the evolution of speech production.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 526-527.

Peters, Jörg.
On mandibular oscillation as a source of variation in infant vocalizations.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 527-527.

Rizzolatti, Giacomo.
What happened to Homo habilis? (Language and mirror neurons).
BBS 1998 21 (4): 527-528.

Scanlan, Jim, Rogers, Lesley.
Ingestive and vocal mechanisms in birds: A parallel?
BBS 1998 21 (4): 528-529.

Sessle, Barry J.
Recent evidence of the involvement of lateral frontal cortex in primate cyclic ingestive movements.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 529-530.

Sieratzki, Jechil S., Woll, Bencie.
An evolutionary model for the learning of language.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 530-530.

Walker, Stephen F.

Brain circuits ancient and modern.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 531-531.

Woll, Bencie, Sieratzki, Jechil S.
Echo phonology: Signs of a link betw