Volume 21 – Issue
TARGET
ARTICLE
Schyns, P.G.,
Goldstone, R.L., Thibaut, J.-P.
The
development of features in object concepts.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 1-17.
OPEN PEER
COMMENTARY
Abdi, H., Valentin,
D., Edelman, B.G.
Eigenfeatures as intermediate-level representations: The case for PCA models.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 17-18.
Benson, P.J.
Feature see,
feature do.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 18-19.
Braisby, N.,
Franks, B.
A
creationist myth: Pragmatic combination not feature creation.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 19-20.
Brooks, L.R.
The
development of new functional features by instruction: The case of medical
education.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 20-21.
Burgund, E.D.,
Marsolek, C.J.
Fixed versus
flexible features in dissociable neural processing subsystems.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 21-22.
Cleeremans,
A.
The other
hard problem: How to bridge the gap between symbolic and subsymbolic cognition.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 22-23.
Deák, G.
Flexible
feature creation: Child's play?
BBS 1998 21 (1): 23-23.
Dominey,
P.F.
Flexible
categorization requires the creation of relational features.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 23-24.
Dorffner, G.
Flexible
features, connectionism, and computational learning theory.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 24-25.
Edelman, S.
Things are
what they seem.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 25-25.
French, R.M.,
Weaver, M.
New-feature
learning: How common is it?
BBS 1998 21 (1): 26-26.
Gauker, C.
Building
block dilemmas
BBS 1998 21 (1): 26-27.
Grossberg,
S.
Self-organizing
features and categories through attentive resonance.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 27-28.
Hahn, U., Chater,
N.
Real-world
categories don't allow uniform feature spaces – not just across categories but
within categories also.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 28-28.
A framework
for structural constraints on feature creation.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 29-29.
Hummel, J.E.,
Kellman, P.J.
Finding the
Pope in the pizza: Abstract invariants and cognitive constraints on perceptual
learning.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 30-30.
Lamberts, K.
Can features
be created on the fly?
BBS 1998 21 (1): 30-31.
Latimer,
C.R.
New features
for old: Creation or derivation?
BBS 1998 21 (1): 31-32.
MacDorman,
K.F.
Feature
learning, multiresolution analysis, and symbol grounding.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 32-32.
Perruchet, P.,
Vinter, A.
Feature
creation as a byproduct of attentional processing
BBS 1998 21 (1): 33-34.
Phillips, W.
A.
Context-dependent
feature discovery is evidence that the coordination of function is a basic
cognitive capacity
BBS 1998 21 (1): 34-35.
Quinn, P.C.
Emergence of
object representations in young infants: Corroborating findings and a challenge
for the feature creation approach.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 35-36.
Singh, M., Landau,
B.
Parts of
visual shape as primitives for categorization.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 36-37.
Tanaka, J.
Parts,
features, and expertise.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 37-38.
Tijsseling,
A.
Do features
arise out of nothing?
BBS 1998 21 (1): 38-39.
Wiemer-Hastings,
K., Graesser, A.C.
Who needs
created features?
BBS 1998 21 (1): 39-39.
Williams, P.,
Gauthier,
Feature learning during the acquisition of perceptual expertise
BBS 1998 21 (1): 40-41.
AUTHORS’
RESPONSE
Schyns, P.G.,
Goldstone, R.L., Thibaut, J.-P.
Ways of
featuring in object categorization
BBS 1998 21 (1): 41-54.
TARGET
ARTICLE
Millikan,
R.G.
A common
structure for concepts of individuals, stuffs, and real kinds: More Mama, more
milk, and more mouse.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 55-65.
OPEN PEER
COMMENTARY
Allen, C.
Animal
concepts.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 66-66.
Bloom, P.
Different
structures for concepts of individuals, stuffs, and real kinds: One Mama, more
milk, and many mice.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 66-67.
Boyer, P.
If
“tracking” is category-specific a “common structure” may be redundant.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 67-68.
Cangelosi, A.,
Parisi, D.
Concepts in
artificial organisms.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 68-69.
Carlson, G.
Names, and
what they are names of.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 69-70.
Franks, B., Braisby,
N.
What is the
point? Concepts, description, and rigid designation.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 70-70.
Gauker, C.
Are there
wordlike concepts too?
BBS 1998 21 (1): 70-71.
Gendler,
T.S.
Why language
is not a “direct medium.”
BBS 1998 21 (1): 71-72.
Ghiselin,
M.T.
Etiological
classification and the acquisition and structure of knowledge.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 72-73.
Gopnik, A.
What can
externalism do for psychologists?
BBS 1998 21 (1): 73-74.
Hampton,
J.A.
Staying in
touch: Externalism needs descriptions.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 74-74.
Hauser, M.D.,
Fitch, W.T.
Reidentification
and redescription.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 74-74.
Keil, F.
The most
basic units of thought do more, and less, than point.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 75-76.
Komatsu,
L.K.
Mapping
Millikan's conceptual work onto (empirical) work by psychologists.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 76-77.
Concept
acquisition and use occurs in (real) context.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 77-78.
MacLennan,
B.J.
Finding
order in our world: The primacy of the concrete in neural representations and
the role of invariance in substance reidentification.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 78-79.
Mandler,
J.M.
Whatever
happened to meaning?
BBS 1998 21 (1): 79-80.
Müller, V.C.,
Kelter, S.
Too much
substance, not enough cognition.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 80-80.
Murphy, G.L.
Extensional
assumptions in theories of meaning and concepts.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 80-81.
Nelson, K.
Beyond
substance concepts in cognitive development.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 81-82.
Perner, J.
Room for
concept development?
BBS 1998 21 (1): 82-83.
Scharer, N.
Can mere
phonemes be components of Millikan's substance concepts?
BBS 1998 21 (1): 83-84.
Schröder, J.
Explanatory
force, antidescriptionism, and the common structure of substance concepts.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 84-85.
Slater, C.
More me?
Substance concepts and self concepts.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 85-85.
ter Meulen,
A.G.B.
Semantic
realism, rigid designation, and dynamic semantics.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 85-86.
van Brake,
J.
A white
thing.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 86-88.
Waxman, S., Thompson,
W.
Words are
invitations to learn about categories.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 88-88.
Xu, F., Tenenbaum,
J.B., Sorrentino, C.M.
Concepts are
not beliefs, but having concepts is having beliefs.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 89-89.
AUTHOR’S
RESPONSE
Millikan. R.G.
Words,
concepts, and entities: With enemies like these, I don't need friends.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 89-100.
TARGET
ARTICLE
Heyes, C. M.
Theory of
mind in nonhuman primates
BBS 1998 21 (1): 101-114.
OPEN PEER
COMMENTARY
Bard, K.A.
Imitation
and mirror self-recognition may be developmental precursors to theory of mind
in human and nonhuman primates.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 115-115.
Baum, W.M.
Why not ask
“Does the chimpanzee have a soul?”
BBS 1998 21 (1): 116-116.
Byrne, R.W.
So much
easier to attack straw men.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 116-117.
Csibra, G.
Seeing is
not believing.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 117-118.
Custance, D.
Apes ape!
BBS 1998 21 (1): 118-119.
Mirrors and
radical behaviorism: Reflections on C. M. Heyes
BBS 1998 21 (1): 119-119.
Gómez, J.C.
Assessing
theory of mind with nonverbal procedures: Problems with training methods and an
alternative “key” procedure.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 119-120.
Gordon, R.M.
The prior
question: Do human primates have a theory of mind?
BBS 1998 21 (1): 120-121.
Gray, C., Russell,
P.
Theory of
mind in nonhuman primates: A question of language?
BBS 1998 21 (1): 121-121.
Green, S.M.,
Anecdotes,
omniscience, and associative learning in examining the theory of mind.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 122-122.
Kamawar, D.,
Olson, D.R.
Theory of
mind in young human primates: Does Heyes's task measure it?
BBS 1998 21 (1): 122-123.
Leavens,
D.A.
Having a
concept “see” does not imply attribution of knowledge: Some general
considerations in measuring “theories of mind.”
BBS 1998 21 (1): 123-124.
Matheson, M.
D., Cooper, M., Weeks, J., Thompson, R., Fragaszy, D.
Attribution
is more likely to be demonstrated in more natural contexts.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 124-126.
Miles, H.L.,
Roberts, W.P.
Methodologies,
not method, for primate theory of mind.
126-127.
Mitchell, R.W.,
Primate
theory of mind is a Turing test.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 127-128.
Parker, A.
Primate
cognitive neuroscience: What are the useful questions?
BBS 1998 21 (1): 128-128.
Pepperberg,
I.M.
To see or
not to see, that is the question: Designing experiments to test
perspective-taking in nonhumans.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 128-129.
Purdy, J.E.,
Domjan, M.
Tactics in
theory of mind research.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 129-130.
Slaughter,
V., Mealey, L.
Seeing is
not (necessarily) believing.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 130-130.
Suddendorf,
T.
Simpler for
evolution: Secondary representation in apes, children, and ancestors.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 131-131.
Precursors
to theories of mind in nonhuman brains.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 131-132.
Whiten, A.
Triangulation,
intervening variables, and experience projection.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 132-133.
Zentall,
T.R.
What can we
learn from the absence of evidence?
BBS 1998 21 (1): 133-134.
AUTHOR’S
RESPONSE
Heyes, C.M.
Liberalism,
chauvinism, and experimental thought.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 134-148.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on
Verleger, R.
Event-related
potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hyptothesis and an
alternative interpretation of P3.
BBS 1988 11: 343-427.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on
Donchin, E., Coles, M.G.H.
Is the P300
component a manifestation of context updating?
BBS 1988 11: 357-374.
Sommer, W.,
Leuthold, H., Matt, J.
The
expectancies that govern the P300 amplitude are mostly automatic and
unconscious.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 149-150.
AUTHORS’
RESPONSE
Verleger, R.
Toward an
integration of P3 research with cognitive neuroscience.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 150-152.
Donchin, E.,
Coles, M.G.H.
Context
updating and the P300.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 152-154.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on
Language,
tools and brain: The ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized
sequential behavior.
BBS 1991 14: 531-595.
Givon, T.
Toward a
neurology of grammar.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 154-155.
Swann, P.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 155-159.
AUTHOR’S
RESPONSE
Language,
tools, and brain revisited
BBS 1998 21 (1): 159-163.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on
Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M.
Memory
metaphors and the real-life/laboratory controversy: Correspondence versus
storehouse conceptions of memory.
BBS 1996
Cohen, G.
Measuring
accuracy is an intractable problem.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 164-164.
Shanon, B.
Metaphorical
pluralism – not on the substantive level!
BBS 1998 21 (1): 164-165.
AUTHORS’
RESPONSE
Koriat, A., Goldsmith,
M.
Methodological
and substantive implications of a metatheoretical distinction: More on
correspondence versus storehouse metaphors of memory.
BBS 1998 21 (1): 165-168.
Volume 21 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLE
Chow, Siu L.
Précis of Statistical significance: Rationale, validity, and
utility.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 169-194.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Blaich, Charles F.
The null-hypothesis significance-test procedure:
Can't live with it, can't live without it.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 194-195.
Boklage,
Charles E.
On the position of statistical significance in the epistemology
of experimental science.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 195-195.
Bookstein, Fred L.
Statistical significance testing was not meant for
weak corroborations of weaker theories.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 195-196.
Dar,
Reuven.
Null hypothesis tests and theory corroboration: Defending NHSTP
out of context.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 196-197.
Erwin, Edward.
The logic of null hypothesis testing.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 197-198.
Frick, Robert W.
Chow's defense of null-hypothesis testing: Too traditional?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 199-199.
Gigerenzer, Gerd.
We need statistical thinking, not statistical
rituals.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 199-200.
Gluck, Judith, Vitouch, Oliver.
Stranded statistical paradigms: The last crusade.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 200-201.
Gregson, Robert A.M.
Understanding Bayesian procedures.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 201-202.
Harris, Richard J.
“With
friends like this . . .”: Three flaws in Chow's defense of significance
testing.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 202-203.
Hayes, Andrew F.
Reconnecting data analysis and research design: Who
needs a confidence interval?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 203-204.
Hunter,
John E.
Testing significance testing: A flawed defense.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 204-204.
Kihlstrom, John F.
If you've got an effect, test its significance; if
you've got a weak effect, do a meta-analysis.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 205-206.
Kraemer,
Helena Chmura.
Statistical significance: A statistician's view.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 206-207.
Krueger, Lester E.
The Ego has landed! The .05 level of statistical
significance is soft (Fisher) rather than hard (Neyman/Pearson).
BBS 1998 21 (2): 207-208.
Kyburg, Henry E.
Logic and the foundations of statistical inference.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 208-209.
Lashley, Brian R.
A defense of statistical power analysis.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 209-210.
Lewandowsky, Stephan, Maybery, Murray.
The critics rebutted: A Pyrrhic victory.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 210-211.
Maher,
Brendan.
When the coefficient hits the clinic: Effect size
and the size of the effect.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 211-211.
Mayo, Deborah G.
Some
problems with Chow's problems with power.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 212-213.
Nester, Marks R.
Significance tests cannot be justified in
theory-corroboration experiments.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 213-213.
Palm,
Günther.
Significance testing – does it need this defence?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 214-215.
Poitevineau, Jacques, Lecoutre, Bruno.
Some statistical misconceptions in Chow's Statistical significance.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 215-215.
Rindskopf,
David.
Null-hypothesis tests are not completely stupid, but Bayesian
statistics are better.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 215-216.
Rossi, Joseph S.
Meta-analysis, power analysis, and the
null-hypothesis significance-test procedure.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 216-217.
Rouanet, Henry.
Significance testing in a Bayesian framework:
Assessing direction of effects.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 217-218.
Shafto, Michael G.
Costs and benefits of statistical significance
tests.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 218-219.
Snow, Paul.
Inductive strategy and statistical tactics.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 219-219.
Stam, Henderikus J.,
The historical case against null-hypothesis
significance testing.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 219-220.
Swijtink, Zeno G.
A plea for
Popperian significance testing.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 220-221.
Tassinary, Louis G.
Significance tests: Necessary but not sufficient.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 221-222.
Thyer,
Bruce A.
On various methods of reporting variance.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 222-223.
Verplanck, William S.
Statistical inference: Why wheels spin.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 223-224.
Vicente,
Kim J.
Four reasons why the science of psychology is still in trouble.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 224-225.
Vokey, John R.
Statistics without probability: Significance
testing as typicality and exchangeability in data analysis.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 225-226.
Waller, Niels G., Johnson, Wesley O.
The non-significance
of straw man arguments.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 226-227.
Zumbo, Bruno D.
A viable alternative to null-hypothesis testing.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 227-228.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Chow, Siu L.
The null-hypothesis significance-test procedure is
still warranted.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 228-235.
TARGET
ARTICLE
Sussman,
Harvey M., Fruchter, David, Hilbert, Jon, Sirosh, Joseph.
Linear correlates in the speech signal: The orderly
output constraint.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 241-259.
OPEN
PEER COMMENTARY
Blumstein, Sheila E.
The mapping
from acoustic structure to the phonetic categories of speech: The invariance
problem.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 260-260.
Brancazio, Lawrence.
Does locus-equation linearity really matter in
consonant perception?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 261-261.
Carré, René.
Linear correlates in the speech signal: Consequences of the
specific use of an acoustic tube?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 261-262.
Damper, R.I.
Self-learning and self-organization as tools for
speech research.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 262-263.
Deng,
Li.
Locus equation and hidden parameters of speech.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 263-264.
Diehl, Randy L.
Locus equations: A partial solution to the problem
of consonant place perception.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 264-264.
Fitch, W. Tecumseh, Hauser, Marc D.
Differences that make a difference: Do locus
equations result from physical principles characterizing all mammalian vocal
tracts?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 264-265.
Fowler, Carol A.
The orderly output constraint is not wearing any
clothes.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 265-266.
Govindarajan,
Listeners' perceptual mapping of locus equations
and variability.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 266-267
Greenberg, Steven.
In search of the unicorn: Where is the invariance
in speech?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 267-268.
Guenther, Frank H.
An account
of the locus equation phenomenon based on speech movement planning.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 268-269.
Herrnberger, Bärbel,
Ehret, Günter.
Linearity or separability?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 269-270.
Idsardi,
William J.
A phonological perspective on locus equations.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 270-271.
Jongman, Allard.
Are locus equations sufficient or necessary for
obstruent perception?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 271-272.
Kanwal,
Jagmeet S.
Charting speech with bats without requiring maps.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 272-273.
Kluender, Keith R.
Locus equations reveal learnability.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 273-274.
Lindblom, Björn.
An articulatory perspective on the locus equation.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 274-275.
Massaro, Dominic W.
Integrating cues in speech perception.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 275-275.
Mattingly, Ignatius G.
Why did coarticulation evolve?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 275-276.
Moore,
David R., King, Andrew J.
What can auditory neuroethology tell us about
speech processing?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 276-277.
Nearey, Terrance M.
Locus
equations and pattern recognition.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 277-277.
Ohl, Frank W., Scheich, Henning.
Feature extraction and feature interaction.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 278-278.
Pastore,
Richard E.,
Locus equation: Assumption and dependencies.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 278-279.
Pind, Jörgen.
Merits of a Gibsonian approach to speech
perception.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 279-280.
Protopapas,
Athanassios, Tallal, Paula.
On the ontogeny of combination-sensitive neurons in speech
perception.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 280-281.
Remez, Robert E.
Listening to speech in the dark.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 281-282.
Ryan, Michael J., Kime, Nicole M.,
Rosenthal, Gil G.
Patterns of evolution in human speech processing
and animal communication.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 282-283.
Sawusch, James R.
Acoustic correlates and perceptual cues in speech.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 283-284.
Schreiner, Christoph E.
Input limitations for cortical
combination-sensitive neurons coding stop-consonants?
BBS 1998 21 (2): 284-284.
Smits, Roel.
Locus equations in models of human classification
behavior.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 284-285.
Wagner, Hermann, Kautz,
Dirk.
Evolutionary
conservation and ontogenetic emergence of neural algorithms.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 285-286.
Wenstrup, Jeffrey J.
Combination-sensitive neurons: A flexible neural
strategy for analyzing correlated elements in sounds.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 286-287.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Sussman,
Harvey M., Fruchter, David, Hilbert, Jon, Sirosh, Joseph.
Human speech: A tinkerer's delight.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 287-295.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Rao, K.R., Palmer,
J.
The
anomaly called psi: Recent research and criticism.
BBS 1987 10: 539-551.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Alcock, J.E.
Parapsychology:
Science of the anomalous or search for the soul?
BBS 1987 10: 553-643.
Glicksohn, Joseph.
The anomaly of the anomalous.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 301-302.
AUTHOR’S
RESPONSE
Palmer,
John.
Parapsychology, anomaly, and altered states of consciousness.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 302-303.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Alcock, James E.
Science, pseudoscience, and anomaly.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 303-303.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on
Reintroducing
group selection to the human behavioral sciences.
BBS 1994 17: 585-654.
Thompson, Nicholas S.
Reintroducing “Reintroducing group selection to the
human behavioral sciences” to BBS readers.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 304-305.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Wilson, David Sloan, Sober, Elliott.
Multilevel selection and the return of group-level
functionalism.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 305-306.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Clark, A., Thornton,
C.
Trading
spaces: Computation, representation, and the limits of uninformed learning.
BBS 1997
Damper,
R.I.
Parity still isn't a generalisation problem.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 307-308.
AUTHORS’
RESPONSE
Thornton,
Chris, Clark, Andy.
Reading the generalizer's mind.
BBS 1998 21 (2): 308-310.
Volume
21 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLE
Fitch, Roslyn Holly,
Denenberg, Victor H.
A role for
ovarian hormones in sexual differentiation of the brain.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 311-327.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Aboitiz, Francisco.
To normalize or not to normalize for overall size?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 327-328.
Baum,
M.J., Tobet, S.A.
Sexual differentiation of callosal size: Hormonal mechanisms and
the choice of an animal model.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 328-328.
Clarke, Stephanie.
Sex-related differences in callosal morphology and
specific callosal connectivity: How far can we go?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 329-329.
Döhler, Klaus D.
More evidence for the role of estrogens in female
differentiation of the brain.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 329-330.
Halpern, Diane F.
Recipe for a sexually dimorphic brain: Ingredients
include ovarian and testicular hormones.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 330-331.
Hampson, Elizabeth.
Is the size of the human corpus callosum influenced
by sex hormones?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 331-332.
Hines, Melissa.
Activation/organization,
masculinization/feminization: What are they and how are they distinguished?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 332-333.
Holloway, Ralph L.
Relative size of the human corpus callosum redux:
Statistical smoke and mirrors?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 333-335.
Hugdahl, Kenneth.
The corpus callosum: More than a passive “corpus.”
BBS 1998 21 (3): 335-335.
Juraska, Janice M.
Updates on
axons in the rat corpus callosum.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 335-336.
Meyer-Bahlburg, Heino F.L.
Estrogens in human psychosexual differentiation.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 336-337.
Rogers,
Lesley J.
Indirect influences of gonadal hormones on sexual
differentiation.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 337-338.
Stewart, Jane.
Female and flexible?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 338-338.
Wahlsten,
Douglas, Bishop, Katherine M.
Effect sizes and meta-analysis indicate no sex dimorphism in the
human or rodent corpus callosum.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 338-339.
Wallen, Kim.
Ovarian influences on female development:
Revolutionary or evolutionary?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 339-340.
Williams, Christina L., Sandstrom, Noah J.
Parallel or serial processes in sexual
differentiation?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 340-341.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Fitch, Roslyn Holly, Denenberg, Victor H.
Default is not in the female, but in the theory.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 341-346.
TARGET ARTICLE
Mazur, Allan, Booth, Alan.
Testosterone and dominance in men.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 353-363.
OPEN
PEER COMMENTARY
Archer,
John.
Problems with the concept of dominance and lack of
empirical support for a testosterone–dominance link.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 363-363.
Brain, Paul F.
Androgens
and human behaviour: A complex relationship.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 363-364.
Bribiescas, Richard G.
Testosterone and dominance: Between-population
variance and male energetics.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 364-365.
Campbell,
Anne, Muncer, Steven, Odber, Josie.
Primacy of organising effects of testosterone.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 365-365.
Cashdan, Elizabeth.
Why is testosterone associated with divorce in men?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 366-366.
Chambers,
Kathleen C.
Target tissue sensitivity, testosterone– social environment
interactions, and lattice hierarchies.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 366-367.
Christensen, Scott E., Breedlove, S. Marc.
Seductive allure of dichotomies.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 367-367.
Cohen, Dov.
Shaping, channelling, and distributing testosterone
in social systems.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 367-368.
Collaer, Marcia L.
Early organizational influences and social factors:
A need for further evaluation.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 368-369.
Constantino, John N.
Dominance and aggression over the life course:
Timing and direction of causal influences.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 369-369.
Coren, Stanley.
Prenatal testosterone exposure, left-handedness,
and high school delinquency.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 369-370.
Dabbs, James M.
Testosterone
and the concept of dominance.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 370-371.
deCantazaro, Denys, Spironello, Emily.
Significance tests: Necessary but not sufficient.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 371-371.
Denenberg,
Victor H.
Testosterone is non-zero, but what is its strength?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 372-372.
Flinn, Mark, Baerwald, Charles, Decker,
Evolutionary functions of neuroendocrine response
to social environment.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 372-374.
Foss,
Jeffrey.
Testosterone and the second sex.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 374-375.
Fox, Robin.
Testosterone is not alone: Internal secretions and
external behavior.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 375-376.
Grant, Valerie J.
Dominance runs deep.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 376-377.
Hines, Melissa.
Adult testosterone levels have little or no
influence on dominance in men.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 377-378.
Kacelnik, Alejandro, Norris, Sasha.
Signalling via testosterone: Communicating health
and vigour.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 378-378.
Kemper,
Theodore D.
Fantasy, females, sexuality, and testosterone.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 378-379.
Kenrick, Douglas T., Barr,
Alicia.
Testosterone's
role in dominance, sex, and aggression: Why so controversial?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 379-380.
Mealey, Linda.
Testosterone-aggression relationship: An exemplar
of interactionism.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 380-381.
Mueller,
Ulrich.
Aggressiveness and dominance.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 381-382.
O’Carroll, Ronal E.
Placebo-controlled manipulations of testosterone
levels and dominance.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 382-383.
Oliveira,
Rui F.
Of fish and men: A comparative approach to androgens and social
dominance.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 383-384.
Snowdon, Charles T.
The nurture of nature: Social, developmental, and
environmental controls of aggression.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 384-385.
Steele, James.
Honour subcultures and the reciprocal model.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 385-386.
Townsend, John Marshall.
Dominance, sexual activity, and sexual emotions.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 386-386.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Booth, Alan, Mazur, Allan.
Old issues and new perspectives on testosterone
research.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 386-390.
TARGET ARTICLE
Howe, Michael J.A., Davidson, Jane W.,
Sloboda, John A.
Innate talents: Reality or myth?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 399-407.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Baltes, Paul B.
Testing the
limits of the ontogenetic sources of talent and excellence.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 407-408
Baron-Cohen, Simon.
Superiority on the Embedded Figures Test in autism
and in normal males: Evidence of an “innate talent”?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 408-409.
Bronfenbrenner,
Urie, Ceci, Stephen J.
Could the answer be talent?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 409-410.
Charness, Neil.
Explaining exceptional performance: Constituent
abilities and touchstone phenomena.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 410-411.
Csikszentmihalyi,
Mihaly.
Fruitless polarities.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 411-411.
Detterman, Douglas K., Gabriel, Lynne T.,
Ruthsatz, Joanne M.
Absurd environmentalism.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 411-412.
Eisenberger, Robert.
Achievement: The importance of industriousness.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 412-413.
Ericsson, K. Anders.
Basic capacities can be modified or circumvented by
deliberate practice: A rejection of talent accounts of expert performance.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 413-414.
Feldman, David Henry, Katzir, Tamar.
Natural talents: An argument for the extremes.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 414-414.
Freeman,
Joan.
Inborn talent exists.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 415-415.
Gagné, Françoys.
A biased
survey and interpretation of the nature–nurture literature.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 415-416.
Hatano, Giyoo.
Might we adopt the learning-related account instead
of the talent account?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 416-417.
Heller,
Kurt A., Ziegler, Albert.
Experience is no improvement over talent.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 417-418.
Humphreys, Lloyd G.
General intelligence is central to many forms of
talent.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 418-418.
Irvine,
Sidney H.
Innate talents: A psychological tautology?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 419-419.
Lehmann, Andreas C.
Historical increases in expert performance suggest
large possibilities for improvement of performance without implicating innate
capacities.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 419-420.
Plomin, Robert.
Genetic influence and cognitive abilities.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 420-421.
Rowe, David C.
Talent scouts, not practice scouts: Talents are
real.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 421-422.
Rutter, Michael.
What can we learn from highly developed special
skills?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 422-423.
Schneider, Wolfgang.
Innate talent or deliberate practice as
determinants of exceptional performance: Are we asking the right question?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 423-424.
Simonton, Dean Keith.
Defining and
finding talent: Data and a multiplicative model?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 424-425
Starkes, Janet, Helsen, Werner.
Practice, practice, practice – Is that all it
takes?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 425-425.
Sternberg,
Robert J.
If the key's not there, the light won't help.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 425-426.
Stevenson, Rosemary J.
Training quality and learning goals: Towards
effective learning for all.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 426-427.
Tesch-Römer,
Clemens.
Attributed talent is a powerful myth.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 427-427.
Trehub, Sandra E., Schellenberg, E. Glenn.
Cultural determinism is no better than biological
determinism.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 427-428.
Vitouch, Oliver.
The rage to drink, or: Frontiers of expertise.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 428-429.
Weisberg, Robert W.
Creativity and practice.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 429-430.
Winner, Ellen.
Talent: Don't confuse necessity with sufficiency,
or science with policy.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 430-431.
Zohar,
Ada H.
Individual differences in some special abilities
are genetically influenced.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 431-432.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Howe, Michael J.A., Davidson, Jane W.,
Sloboda, John A.
Natural born talents undiscovered.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 432-437.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Geary, D.C.
Sexual
selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities.
BBS 1996 19: 229-284.
Frost,
Peter.
Sex differences may indeed exist for 3-D
navigational abilities: But was sexual selection responsible?
BBS 1998 21 (3): 443-444.
AUTHOR’S
RESPONSE
Geary,
David C.
Sexual selection, the division of labor, and the
evolution of sex differences.
BBS 1998 21 (3): 444-447.
Volume
21 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLE
Edelman, Shimon.
Representation
is representation of similarities.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 449-467.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Andresen, David R., Marsolek, Chad J.
Chorus of k
prototypes or discord of contradictory representations?
BBS 1998 21 (4): 467-468.
Benson,
Philip J.
Seeing wood because of the trees? A case of failure in
reverse-engineering.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 468-468.
Bonmassar, Giorgio, Schwartz, Eric L.
Representation is space-variant.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 469-470.
Eisler,
Hannes.
Distal similarity, shape referents, subjective world, and
redundancy.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 470-470.
Eklundh, Jan-Olof, Carlsson, Stefan.
Appearance is more than shape, illumination, and
pose.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 470-471.
Földiák, Peter.
What is wrong with prototypes.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 471-472.
Goldstone, Robert L.
Objects, please remain composed.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 472-473.
Gregson, Robert A.M.
Metric assumptions are neither necessary nor
sufficient to describe similarities.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 473-473.
Grossberg, Stephen.
Representations need self-organizing top-down
expectations to fit a changing world.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 473-474.
Hahn, Ulrike, Chater,
Nick.
The notion
of distal similarity is ill defined.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 474-475.
Intrator, Nathan.
Representation of similarities and correspondence
structure.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 475-475.
Jüttner,
Martin.
Representation of similarities – a psychometric but not an
explanatory concept for categorization.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 475-476.
Latimer, Cyril.
The Chorus scheme: Representation or isomorphism,
holistic or analytic?
BBS 1998 21 (4): 476-477.
Markman,
Arthur B., Yamauchi, Takashi.
Boundary conditions and the need for multiple forms of
representation.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 477-478.
Palm, Guenther.
How to combine interpolation with feedback?
BBS 1998 21 (4): 478-478.
Postma, Eric, van den Herik, Jaap, Hudson,
Patrick.
Attentional dynamics and a chorus of geons.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 479-479.
Sokolov, E.N.
Vector code differences and similarities.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 479-480.
Stuart, Bradley V.
Visual tasks require manipulable representations.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 480-480.
Tovée,
M.J.
A neural basis for the Chorus model?
BBS 1998 21 (4): 481-481.
van Brakel, J.
A
multiculture of veridicalities.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 481-482.
van Leeuwen, Cees.
Regular spaces versus computing with chaos.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 482-484.
Williamson,
James R.
How is representation learned?
BBS 1998 21 (4): 484-484.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Edelman, Shimon.
Shape representation by Second-order Isomorphism
and the Chorus model: SIC.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 484-493.
TARGET
ARTICLE
MacNeilage,
Peter F.
The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 499-511.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Abbs, James H., DePaul, Roxanne.
Motor cortex fields and speech movements: Simple
dual control is implausible.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 511-512.
Abry, Christian, Boë, Louis-Jean, Laboissière, Schwartz, Jean-Luc.
A new puzzle for the evolution of speech?
BBS 1998 21 (4): 512-513.
Andrew, R.J.
Cyclicity in speech derived from call repetition
rather than from intrinsic cyclicity of ingestion.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 513-514.
Bloom, Kathleen.
The missing link's missing link: Syllabic
vocalizations at 3 months of age.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 514-515.
Buckingham, Hugh W.
Embodiment, muscle sense, and memory for speech.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 515-515.
Carstairs-McCarthy,
Andrew.
The
frame/content model and syntactic evolution.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 515-516.
Ghazanfar, Asif A., Katz, Donald B.
Distributed neural substrates and the evolution of
speech production.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 516-517.
Goldberg,
Gary, Brooks, Roberta.
Premotor systems, language-related neurodynamics, and cetacean
communication.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 517-518.
Greenberg, Steven.
A syllable-centric framework for the evolution of
spoken language.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 518-518.
Harley,
Trevor A.
Content without a frame? The role of vocabulary biases in speech
errors.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 518-519.
Jürgens, Uwe.
Speech evolved from vocalization, not mastication.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 519-520.
Levelt, Willem J.M., Schiller, Niels O.
Is the syllable frame stored?
BBS 1998 21 (4): 520-520.
Lieberman, Philip.
Speech evolution: Let barking dogs sleep.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 520-521.
Lindblom, Björn.
A curiously ubiquitous articulatory movement.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 521-522
Lund,
James P.
Is speech just chewing the fat?
BBS 1998 21 (4): 522-522.
McCune, Lorraine.
Frame
dominance: A developmental phenomenon?
BBS 1998 21 (4): 522-523.
Menn, Lise.
A multi-modal, emergent view of the development of
syllables in early phonology.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 523-524.
Munhall,
K.G., Jones J.A.
Articulatory evidence for syllabic structure.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 524-525.
Ohala, John J.
Content first, frame later.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 525-526.
Pepperberg,
Irene M.
Out of the mouths of babes . . . and beaks of birds? A broader
interpretation of the frame/content theory for the evolution of speech
production.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 526-527.
Peters, Jörg.
On mandibular oscillation as a source of variation
in infant vocalizations.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 527-527.
Rizzolatti, Giacomo.
What happened to Homo
habilis? (Language and mirror neurons).
BBS 1998 21 (4): 527-528.
Scanlan, Jim, Rogers, Lesley.
Ingestive and vocal mechanisms in birds: A
parallel?
BBS 1998 21 (4): 528-529.
Sessle, Barry J.
Recent evidence of the involvement of lateral
frontal cortex in primate cyclic ingestive movements.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 529-530.
Sieratzki, Jechil S., Woll, Bencie.
An evolutionary model for the learning of language.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 530-530.
Walker, Stephen F.
Brain
circuits ancient and modern.
BBS 1998 21 (4): 531-531.
Woll, Bencie, Sieratzki, Jechil S.
Echo phonology: Signs of a link betw