Volume 19 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLE
Koehler, J.J.
The base rate fallacy reconsidered:
Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges.
BBS 1996 19 (1):1+.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Cognitive algebra versus representativeness heuristic.
BBS 1996 19 (1):17+.
Callen, C.R.
The implications of Koehler’s approach for fact-finding.
BBS 1996 19 (1):18+.
Cohen, L.J.
The need for a theory of evidential weight.
BBS 1996 19 (1):18+.
Connolly, T.
Are base rates a natural category of information?
BBS 1996 19 (1):19+.
Dawes, R.M.
The purpose of experiments: Ecological
validity versus comparing hypotheses.
BBS 1996 19 (1):20+.
Edgell, S.E., Roe, R.M., Dodd, C.H.
Base rates, experience, and the big picture.
BBS 1996 19 (1):21+.
Fernandez-Berrocal, P., Almaraz, J.,
How to reconsider the base rate fallacy without forgetting the concept of
systematic processing.
BBS 1996 19 (1):21+.
Funder, D.C.
Base rates, stereotypes, and judgmental accuracy.
BBS 1996 19 (1):22+.
Gigerenzer, G.
Why do frequency formats improve Bayesian reasoning? Cognitive algorithms work
on information, which needs representation.
BBS 1996 19 (1):23+.
Ginzburg, L.R., Janson, C., Ferson, S.
Judgment under uncertainty: Evolution
may not favor a probabilistic calculus.
BBS 1996 19 (1):24+.
Physicians neglect base rates, and it matters.
BBS 1996 19 (1):25+.
Keren, G., Thijs, L.J..
The base rate controversy: Is the
glass half-full or half-empty?
BBS 1996 19 (1):26+.
Klar, Y.
P(D/H), P(D/~H), and base rate consideration.
BBS 1996 19 (1):26+.
Kleiter, G.D.
Critical and natural sensitivity to base rates.
BBS 1996 19 (1):27+.
Koonce, L.
Base rates in the applied domain of accounting.
BBS 1996 19 (1):29+.
Krueger, J.
Studying the use of base rates:
BBS 1996 19 (1):30+.
Kyburg, H.E. Jr.
Probabilistic fallacies.
BBS 1996 19 (1):31-31.
Levi,
Fallacy and controversy about base rates.
BBS 1996 19 (1):31-32.
Margolis, H.
Nuancing should not imply neglecting.
BBS 1996 19 (1):32+.
McCauley, C.
First things first: What is the base
rate?
BBS 1996 19 (1):33+.
McKenzie, C.R.M., Soll, J.B.
Which reference class is evoked?
BBS 1996 19 (1):34+.
McLeod, P.J., Watt, M.
How are base rates used? Interactive and group effects.
BBS 1996 19 (1):35+.
Melone, N.P., McGuire, T.W.
Conservatism revisited: Base rates,
prior probabilities, and averaging strategies.
BBS 1996 19 (1):36+.
Quinsey, V.L.
Improving decision accuracy where base rates matter: The prediction of violent recidivism.
BBS 1996 19 (1):37+.
Spellman, B.A.
The implicit use of base rates in experiential and ecologically valid tasks.
BBS 1996 19 (1):38+.
Stalker, D.
Where do you stand on the base rate issue?
BBS 1996 19 (1):38-39.
Thomsen, C.J., Borgida, E.
Throwing out the baby with the bathwater:
Let’s not overstate the overselling of the base rate fallacy.
BBS 1996 19 (1):39+.
Vicente, K.J.
The perils of reconstructive remembering and the value of representative
design.
BBS 1996 19 (1):40+.
Windschitl, P.D., Wells, G.L.
Base rates do not constrain nonprobability judgments.
BBS 1996 19 (1):40+.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Koehler, J.J.
Issues for the next generation of base rate research.
BBS 1996 19 (1):41+.
TARGET ARTICLE
Latash, M.L., Anson, J.G.
What are “normal movements” in atypical populations?
BBS 1996 19 (1):55+.
Aruin, A.S.
Adaptive changes in postural reactions after unilateral leg amputation.
BBS 1996 19 (1):68+.
Berardelli, A., Agostino, R., Currà,
A., Manfredi, M.
Bradykinesia in Parkinson’s disease and cocontraction activity in dystonia are
unlikely to be due to adaptive changes in the CNS.
BBS 1996 19 (1):69+.
Biryukova, E.V., Frolov, A.A., Burnod,
Y., Robybrami, A.
Evaluation of central commands: Toward
a theoretical basis for rehabilitation.
BBS 1996 19 (1):69+.
Bouisset, S.
Posturo-kinetic capacity in the disabled.
BBS 1996 19 (1):71+.
Dynamic similarities in action systems.
BBS 1996 19 (1):71+.
Carr, J.H., Shepherd, R.B.
“Normal” is not the issue: It is “effective”
goal attainment that counts.
BBS 1996 19 (1):72+.
Corcos, D.M., Pfann, K.D., Buchman,
A.S.
Defective preprogramming does not account for the clinical deficits of Parkinson’s
disease.
BBS 1996 19 (1):73+.
Gielen, C.C.A.M.
“Abnormal” movements: What are they
reflections of?
BBS 1996 19 (1):74+.
Goldberg, G.,
The goal of treatment for motor impairment is not to “normalize” but to “functionalize”
through facilitative modulation and enabling context.
BBS 1996 19 (1):75-76.
Gurd, J.M.
Thought is action.
BBS 1996 19 (1):76+.
Holt, K.G.
“Constraint” versus “choice” in preferred movement patterns.
BBS 1996 19 (1):76-77.
Anticipatory postural mechanisms: Some
evidence and methodological implications.
BBS 1996 19 (1):77+.
Klatzky, R.L.
What makes a population atypical—priorities
or constraints?
BBS 1996 19 (1):78+.
Konczak, J., Dichgans, J.
The concept of “normal” movement and its consequences for therapy.
BBS 1996 19 (1):79+.
Levin, M.F.
Should stereotypic movement synergies in hemiparetic patients be considered adaptive?
BBS 1996 19 (1):79+.
Martin-Iverson, M.T.
Theories need data and patients need treatment: Where’s the beef?
BBS 1996 19 (1):80-81.
Masters, R.S.W., Polman, R.C.J.
What are “normal movements” in any
population?
BBS 1996 19 (1):81+.
Morris, M., Matyas, T., Iansek, R., Cunningham, R.
Rehabilitation promotes functional movement in atypical populations.
BBS 1996 19 (1):82+.
Newell, K.M., Morrison, S.
Frames of reference and normal movement.
BBS 1996 19 (1):83+.
Phillips, J.G., Bradshaw, J.L., Slavin,
M.J., Pantelis, C.
Abnormal movements can be identified in “atypical” populations.
BBS 1996 19 (1):84+.
Scholz, J.P.
How functional are atypical motor patterns?
BBS 1996 19 (1):85+.
Sparrow, W.A.
What is the appropriate criterion for therapeutic intervention in the motor
domain?
BBS 1996 19 (1):86-86.
Summers, J.J., Thomas, J.
When are adaptive motor patterns nonadaptive?
BBS 1996 19 (1):87+.
Swinnen, S.P., Verschueren, S.M.P.,
Dounskaia, N.
Is motor pathology associated with setting new CNS priorities or with increased
difficulty in overcoming or suppressing preexisting CNS priorities?
BBS 1996 19 (1):87+.
Thelen, E.
Development “movement disorders” and problem solving.
BBS 1996 19 (1):88+.
Treffner, P.J., Kelso, J.A.S.
Generic mechanisms of coordination in special populations.
BBS 1996 19 (1):89+.
van Emmerik, R.E.A., Wagenaar, R.C.
On optimality and movement disorders:
A dynamic systems perspective.
BBS 1996 19 (1):90+.
Wade, M.G., Guan, J.
Anthropomorphizing the CNS: Is it
what or who you know?
BBS 1996 19 (1):90+.
Walter, C.B., Kamm, K.
Optimal search strategies for optimal motor solutions: Self-determination or informed guidance?
BBS 1996 19 (1):91+.
Wing, A.M., Kirker, S., Jenner,
J.R.
Altered bilateral muscle synergies after stroke.
BBS 1996 19 (1):92+.
Worringham, C.J., Kerr, G.K., O’Brien, C.
Towards functional movement: Implications
for research and therapy.
BBS 1996 19 (1):92+.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Anson, J.G., Latash, M.L.
Toward peaceful coexistence of adaptive central strategies and medical
professionals.
BBS 1996 19 (1):94+.
TARGET ARTICLE
Barresi, J., Moore, C.
Intentional relations and social understanding.
BBS 1996 19 (1):107+.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Allen, C.
Comparative cognitive studies, not folk phylogeny, please.
BBS 1996 19 (1):122+.
Baron0-Cohen, S.
Can children with autism integrate first and third person representations.
BBS 1996 19 (1):123+.
Ben Ze’ev, A., Oatley, K.
Development of social emotions and constructive agents.
BBS 1996 19 (1):124+.
Budwig, N.,
Language and its role in understanding intentional relations: Research tool or mechanism of
development?
BBS 1996 19 (1):125+.
Church, J.
An ambiguity.
BBS 1996 19 (1):126-127.
Csibra, G., Gergely, G.
On the dangers of oversimulation.
BBS 1996 19 (1):127+.
Dwyer, S.
Moral competence is cognitive but (perhaps) nonmodular.
BBS 1996 19 (1):128+.
Gallup, G.G.
Rhesus monkeys are radical behaviorists.
BBS 1996 19 (1):129+.
Gomez, J.C.
Second person intentional relations and the evolution of social understanding.
BBS 1996 19 (1):129+.
Gordon, R.M.
First person representations need a methodology based on simulation or theory.
BBS 1996 19 (1):130+.
Heyes, C.M.
Imagination and imitation: Input,
acid test, or alchemy?
BBS 1996 19 (1):131+.
Hobson, R.P.
Understanding minds and selves.
BBS 1996 19 (1):132+.
Mitchell, R.W.
Self-knowledge, knowledge of other minds, and kinesthetic-visual matching.
BBS 1996 19 (1):133+.
Morton, A.
But what is the intentional schema?
BBS 1996 19 (1):133+.
Nelson, K.
Four-year-old humans are different:
Why?
BBS 1996 19 (1):134+.
Olson, D.R., Homer, B.
Understanding that looking causes knowing.
BBS 1996 19 (1):135+.
Oosterwegel, A.
Social relations and understanding the intentional self.
BBS 1996 19 (1):136+.
Povinelli, D.J., Zebouni, M.C., Prince,
C.G.
Ontogeny, evolution, and folk psychology.
BBS 1996 19 (1):137+.
Premack, D., Premack, A.J.
Intentional schema will not do the work of a theory of mind.
BBS 1996 19 (1):138+.
Reddy, V.
Omitting the second person in social understanding.
BBS 1996 19 (1):140-141.
Slater, C.
Are blind babies delayed in achieving social understanding?
BBS 1996 19 (1):141+.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Barresi, J., Moore, C.
Understanding self and other.
BBS 1996 19 (1):142+.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Donald, M.
Précis
of Origins of the modern mind.
BBS 1993 16: 737-791.
Baum, E.B.
Did courtship drive the evolution of mind?
BBS 1996 19 (1):155+.
Lieberman, P.
On neanderthal speech and human evolution.
BBS 1996 19 (1):156+.
Olson, D.R.
Taxing memory: Writing, memory, and
conceptual change.
BBS 1996 19 (1):158+.
Stenning, K.
Episodic is what apes are not.
BBS 1996 19 (1):158+.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Donald, M.
The role of vocalization, memory retrieval, and external symbols in cognitive
evolution.
BBS 1996 19 (1):159+.
Volume 19 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLE
Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M.
Memory metaphors and the real-life/laboratory controversy: Correspondence versus storehouse conceptions of memory.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 167+.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Algom, D.
Correspondence conception of memory:
A good match is hard to find.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 188+.
Alterman, R.
Everyday memory and activity.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 189+.
Functional memory requires a quite different value metaphor.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 190+.
Bahrick, H.P.
The relation between reproductive and reconstructive processing of memory
content.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 191+.
Begg, I.M.
On correspondence, accuracy, and truth.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 191+.
Ben-Ze’ev, A.
The alternative to the storehouse metaphor.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 192+.
Bjork, R.A., Wickens, T.D.
Memory, metamemory, and conditional statistics.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 193-194.
Bruce, D.
The correspondence metaphor: Prescriptive
or descriptive?
BBS 1996 19 (2): 194+.
Conway, M.A.
What do memories correspond to?
BBS 1996 19 (2): 195+.
Eichenbaum, H.
The real-life/laboratory controversy as viewed from the cognitive neurobiology
of animal learning and memory.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 196+.
Fisher, R.P.
Implications of output-bound measures for laboratory and field research in memory.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 197+.
Karn, K.S., Zelinsky, G.J.
Driving and dish-washing: Failure of
the correspondence metaphor for memory.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 198+.
Kruglanski, A.W.
The storehouse/correspondence partition in memory research: Promises and perils.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 198+.
Kvavilashvili, L., Ellis, J.
Lets forget the everyday/laboratory controversy.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 199+.
Larsen, S.F.
Correspondence to the past: The
essence of the archaeology metaphor.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 200+.
Mayes, A.R., Vaneijk, R., Gooding,
P.L.
Accuracy and quantity are poor measures of recall and recognition.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 201-202.
Mazzoni, G.
The phenomenal object of memory and control processes.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 202+.
McNamara, T.P.
False dichotomies and dead metaphors.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 203+.
Neisser, U.
Remembering as doing.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 203+.
Nelson, T.O.
Metacognition, metaphors, and the measurement of human memory.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 204+.
Newby, I.R., Ross, M.
Beyond the correspondence metaphor:
When accuracy cannot be assessed.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 205+.
Palmer, D.C.
Operationalizing “correspondence.”
BBS 1996 19 (2): 206+.
Schwartz, B.L.
Amnesia and metamemory demonstrate the importance of both metaphors.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 207+.
Small, J.P.
Classical antecedents for modern metaphors for memory.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 208+.
White, K.G.
Direct remembering and the correspondence metaphor.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 208+.
Winograd, E.
Contexts and functions of retrieval.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 209+.
Wright, D.B.
Hypothesis testing in experimental and naturalistic memory research.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 210+.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M.
The correspondence metaphor of memory:
Right, wrong, or useful?
BBS 1996 19 (2): 211+.
TARGET ARTICLE
Geary, D.C.
Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 229+.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Casey, M.B.
Do gender differences in spatial skills mediate gender differences in mathematics
among high-ability students?
BBS 1996 19 (2): 247+.
Chipman, S.F.
Still far too sexy a topic.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 248+.
Crow, T.J.
All sex differences in cognitive ability may be explained by an X-Y homologous
gene determining degrees of cerebral asymmetry.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 249+.
Is there a comparative psychology of implicit mathematical knowledge?
BBS 1996 19 (2): 250+.
Dowker, A.
How important is spatial ability to mathematics?
BBS 1996 19 (2): 251+.
Epstein, H.T.
Omissions relevant to gender-linked mathematical abilities.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 251+.
Feingold, A.
On an evolutionary model of sex differences in mathematics: Do the data support the theory?
BBS 1996 19 (2): 252+.
Foss, J.
Arithmetic and old lace.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 252-253.
Frith, U., Happe, F.
Mary has more: sex differences,
autism, coherence, and theory of mind.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 253+.
Ghiselin, M.T.
Differences in male and female cognitive abilities: Sexual selection of division of labor?
BBS 1996 19 (2): 254+.
Gilger, J.W.
Sex differences in mathematical ability:
Genes, environment, and evolution.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 255+.
Halpern, D.F.
Mating, math achievement, and other multiple relationships.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 256+.
Hammer, C., Dusek, R.V.
Brain differences, anthropological stories, and educational implications.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 257+.
Humphreys, L.G.
A critic with a different perspective.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 257+.
Kimball, M.M.
Some problematic links between hunting and geometry.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 258+.
Kornbrot, D.E.
Resources, dimorphism, sexual selection, and mathematics achievement.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 259+.
Newcombe, N., Baenninger, M.
Sexual-selection accounts of human characteristics: Just So Stories or scientific hypotheses?
BBS 1996 19 (2): 259+.
Proudfoot, D.
The logic of the sociobiological model, Geary-style.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 261-261.
The twain shall meet: Uniting the
analysis of sex differences and within-sex variation.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 262+.
Spatial visualization and sex-related differences in mathematical problem
solving.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 262+.
Stanley, J.C., Stumpf, H.
Able youths and achievement tests.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 263+.
Tan, Ü.
We are far from understanding sex-related differences in spatial-mathematical
abilities despite the theory of sexual selection.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 264+.
Thomas, H
Between-sex differences are often averaging artifacts.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 265+.
Wynn, T., Tierson, F., Palmer, C.
Sex differences and evolutionary by-products.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 265+.
Zohar, A.H.
Genetic influences on sex differences in outstanding mathematical reasoning
ability.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 266+.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Geary, D.C.
On the biology and politics of cognitive sex differences.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 267+.
TARGET ARTICLE
Wright, J.J., Liley, D.T.J.
Dynamics of the brain at global and microscopic scales: Neural networks and the EEG.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 285+.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Amit, D.J.
Is the time ripe for integration of scales?
BBS 1996 19 (2): 295+.
Bullock, T.H.
Is the distribution of coherence a test of the model?
BBS 1996 19 (2): 296+.
Érdi, P.
Levels, models, and brain activities:
Neurodynamics is pluralistic.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 296+.
Erwin, H.R.
Multiscale modeling of the brain should be validated in more detail against the
biological data.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 297+.
Freeman, W.J.
Neural system stability.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 298+.
Hardcastle, V.G.
Modeling for modeling’s sake?
BBS 1996 19 (2): 299-299.
Ingber, L.
Nonlinear nonequilibrium nonquantum nonchaotic statistical mechanics of
neocortical interactions.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 300+.
Koerner, E.
Comparative reduction of theories –
or over-simplification?
BBS 1996 19 (2): 301+.
Kowalik, Z.J., Wrobel, A., Rydz, A.
Why does the human brain need to be a nonlinear system?
BBS 1996 19 (2): 302+.
Lijenström, H.
Neuromodulation can significantly change the dynamical state of cortical networks.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 303+.
Miller, R.
Empirical data base for simulation:
Firing rates and axonal conduction velocity for cortical neurons.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 304+.
Molnár, M.
Chaos in induced rhythms of the brain:
The value of ERP studies.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 305+.
Nunez, P.L.
Multiscale neocortical dynamics, experimental EEG measures, and global
facilitation of local cell assemblies.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 305+.
Oliver, A.
Dynamics of the brain – from the statistical properties of neural signals to
the development of representations.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 306+.
Preissl, H., Lutzenberger, W.,
Pulvermüller, F.
Is there chaos in the brain?
BBS 1996 19 (2): 307+.
Pritchard, W.S.
The EEG data indicate stochastic
nonlinearity.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 308+.
Tsuda, I.
The form of chaos in the noisy brain can manifest function.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 309+.
Zhadin, M.N.
Rhythmicity in the EEG and global stabilization of the average level of
excitation in the cerebral cortex.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 309+.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Wright, J.J., Liley, D.T.J.
Multiscale modeling of brain dynamics depends upon approximations at each
scale.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 310+.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Baron, J.
Nonconsequentialist
decisions.
BBS 1994 17: 1-42.
Beyth-Marom, R.
On the description of the prescription.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 321+.
Cabanac, M.
The evolutionary point of view: Rationality
is elsewhere.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 322+.
Lindsay, R.O., Gorayska, B.
Consequences of basing ethical judgments on heuristics.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 322+.
Stanovich, K.E.
Decentered thought and consequentialist decision making.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 323+.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Baron, J.
Situated cognition, prescriptive theory, evolution, and something.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 324+.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Shastri, L. &
Ajjanagadde, V.
From
simple associations to systematic reasoning: A connectionist representation of
rules, variables, and dynamic bindings using temporal synchrony.
BBS 1993 16: 417-494.
Bonatti, L.
SHRUTI’S ontology is representational.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 326+.
Lange, T.E., Dyer, M.G.
Parallel reasoning in structured connectionist networks: Signatures versus temporal synchrony.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 328+.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Shastri, L.
Temporal synchrony, dynamic bindings, and SHRUTI: A representational but nonclassical model of reflexive reasoning.
BBS 1996 19 (2): 331+.
Volume 19 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLES
Controversies in Neuroscience IV: Motor learning and synaptic plasticity in the
cerebellum: Introduction.
BBS 1996 19 (3): v+.
Cerebellar long-term depression as investigated in a cell culture preparation.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 339+.
Crépel, F., Hemart, N., Jaillard, D., Daniel, H.
Cellular mechanisms of long-term depression in the cerebellum.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 347+.
Long-lasting potentiation of GABAergic inhibitory synaptic transmission in
cerebellar Purkinje cells: Its properties and possible mechanisms.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 354+.
Vincent, S.R.
Nitric oxide and synaptic plasticity: NO news from the cerebellum.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 362+.
Houk, J.C., Buckingham, J.T.,
Barto, A.G.
Models of the cerebellum and motor learning.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 368+.
Simpson,
J.I., Wylie, D.R., De Zeeuw, C.I.
On climbing fiber signals and their consequence(s)
BBS 1996 19 (3): 384+.
Smith,
A.M.
Does the cerebellum learn strategies for the optimal time-varying control of
joint stiffness?
BBS 1996 19 (3): 399+.
Trach, W.T.
On the specific role of the cerebellum in motor learning and cognition: Clues
from PET activation and lesion studies in man.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 411+.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Arbib, M.A.
Spanning the levels in cerebellar function.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 434+.
Baudry, M.
Similarities and contrasts between cerebellar LTD and hippocampal LTP.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 435+.
Bekkering,
H., Heck, D., Sultan, F.
What has to be learned in motor learning?
BBS 1996 19 (3): 436+.
Bindman, L.J.
How and where does nitric oxide affect cerebellar synaptic plasticity? New
methods for investigating its action.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 437+.
Bower, J.M.
Perhaps it's time to completely rethink cerebellar function.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 438+.
Calabresi, P., Pisani, A., Bernardi,
G.
Long-term changes of synaptic transmission: A topic of long-term interest.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 439+.
De Schutter, E.
One cannot build theories of cerebellar function on shaky foundations: Induction
properties of long-term depression have to be taken into account.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 440+.
Dean, P.
Saccades and the adjustable pattern generator.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 441+.
Dufossé,
M.
How can the cerebellum match ''error signal'' and ''error correction''?
BBS 1996 19 (3): 442-442.
Feldman, A.G., Levin, M.F.
Grasping cerebellar function depends on our understanding the principles of
sensorimotor integration: The frame of reference hypothesis.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 442+.
Fiala, J.C., Bullock, D.
Timing implications of metabotropic mechanisms for cerebellar learning.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 445+.
Flament, D., Ebner, T.J.
The cerebellum as comparator: Increases in cerebellar activity during motor
learning may reflect its role as part of an error detection/correction
mechanism.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 447+.
Gielen, C.
Cerebellum does more than recalibration of movements after perturbations.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 448+.
Gilbert,
P.F.C.
How and what does the cerebellum learn?
BBS 1996 19 (3): 449+.
Gomi,
H.
Is stiffness a byproduct or a target?
BBS 1996 19 (3): 450+.
Haggard,
P.
What can and what cannot be adjusted in the movement patterns of cerebellar
patients?
BBS 1996 19 (3): 451+.
Hallett, M.
The role of the cerebellum in motor learning is limited.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 453+.
Hartell, N.A.
Two separate pathways for cerebellar LTD: NO-dependent and NO-independent.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 453+.
Hesslow, G.
Positive cerebellar feedback loops.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 455+.
Hepp, K.
Programming the cerebellum.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 455+.
Hirano, T.
Molecules involved in cerebellar long-term depression (LTD) and mutant mice
defective in it.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 456+.
Hore, J.
Cerebellar arm ataxia: Theories still have a lot to explain.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 457+.
Houk, J.C., Alford, S.
Computational significance of the cellular mechanisms for synaptic plasticity
in Purkinje cells.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 457+.
Jaeger, D.
Constructing a theory of cerebellar function in limb movement control is
premature.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 461+.
New players for cerebellar long-term depression.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 462+.
Kawato, M.
The common inverse-dynamics motor-command coordinates for complex and simple
spikes.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 462+.
Kiedrowski,
L.
Which cerebellar cells contribute to extracellular cGMP?
BBS 1996 19 (3): 464+.
Latash, L.P., Latash, M.L.
The notions of joint stiffness and synaptic plasticity in motor memory.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 465+.
Miall, R.C., Malkmus, M.,
Robertson, E.M.
Sensory prediction as a role for the cerebellum.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 466+.
Mori-Okamoto, J., Okamoto, K.
Further evidence for the involvement of nitric oxide in trans-ACPD-induced
suppression of AMPA responses in cultures chick Purkinje neurons.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 467+.
Okada, D.
Nitric oxide is involved in cerebellar long-term depression.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 468+.
O’Mara, S.M.
The cerebellum and cerebral cortex: Contrasting and converging contributions to
spatial navigation and memory.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 469+.
Paulin, M.G.
Cerebellar theory out of control.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 470+.
Roberts, P.D., McCollum, G., Holly,
J.E.
Cerebellar rhythms: Exploring another metaphor.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 471+.
Schmahmann, J.D.
Dysmetria of thought: Correlations and conundrums in the relationship between
the cerebellum, learning, and cognitive processing.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 472+.
Sultan,
F., Heck, D., Bekkering, H.
How to link the specificity of cerebellar anatomy to motor learning?
BBS 1996 19 (3): 474+.
Swinnen, S.P., Walter, C.B.,
Dounskaia, N.
We know a lot about the cerebellum, but do we know what motor learning is? BBS
1996 19 (3): 474+.
Thompson, R.F.
Motor learning and synaptic plasticity in the cerebellum.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 475+.
Timmann, D, Diener, H.C.
Limitations of PET and lesion studies in defining the role of the human cerebellum
in motor learning.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 477+.
van Donkelaar, P.
Sensorimotor learning in structures ''upstream'' from the cerebellum.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 477+.
Van Galen, G.P., Hendriks, A.W.,
Dejong, W.P.
What behavioral benefit does stiffness control have? An elaboration of Smith's
proposal.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 478+.
Weiss, C, Disterhoft, J.F.
Eyeblink conditioning, motor control, and the analysis of limbic-cerebellar
interactions.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 479+.
Wessel, K.
Plasticity of cerebro-cerebellar interactions in patients with cerebellar
dysfunction.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 481+.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSES
A cerebellar long-term depression update.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 482+.
Crépel, F.
Cellular mechanisms of long-term depression: From consensus to open questions.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 488+.
A bridge between cerebellar long-term depression and discrete motor learning: Studies
on gene knockout mice.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 488+.
Vincent, S.R.
NO more news from the cerebellum.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 490+.
Houk, J.C., Barto, A.G.
More models of the cerebellum.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 492+.
Simpson, J.I., Wylie, D.R.W.,
Dezeeuw, C.I.
More on climbing fiber signals and their consequence(s).
BBS 1996 19 (3): 496+.
Smith, A.M.
Resilient cerebellar theory complies with stiff opposition.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 499+.
Thach, W.T.
Q: Is the cerebellum and adaptive
combiner of motor and mental/motor activities? A: Yes, maybe, certainly not, who can say?
BBS 1996 19 (3): 501-502.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Sperber, D. &
Wilson, D.
Précis
of Relevance: Communication and Cognition.
BBS 1987 10: 697-754.
Chiappe, D.L., Kukla, A.
Context-selection and the frame problem.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 529+.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Sperber, D., Wilson, D.
Fodor's frame problem and relevance theory.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 530+.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Cicchetti, D.V.
The
reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A
cross-disciplinary investigation.
BBS 1991 14: 119-134.
Somit, A.,
Journal response time: A case for multiple submission.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 533-534.
Editorial Commentary
Cicchetti,
D.V.
The
peer review process for manuscripts submitted to an international chemistry
journal: Evidence for more agreement on acceptance than on rejection.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 534.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Cicchetti, D.V.
Peer review: Agreement and disagreement.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 534+.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Velmans, M.
Is
human information processing conscious?
BBS 1991 14: 651-726.
Rakover, S.S.
The place of consciousness in the information processing approach: The
mental-pool thought experiment.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 537+.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Velmans, M.
Consciousness and the ''causal paradox.''
BBS 1996 19 (3): 538+.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Johnson-Laird, P.N.
& Byrne, R.M.J.
Précis
of Deduction.
BBS 1993 16: 323-380.
Hardman, D.
Mental models: The revised theory brings new problems.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 542+.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Johnson-Laird, P.N., Byrne, R.M.J.
Mental models and syllogisms.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 543+.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on
Coevolution
of neocortical size, group size and language in humans.
BBS 1993 16:681-735.
Kemmerer, D.
What about the increasing adaptive value of manipulative language use?
BBS 1996 19 (3): 546+.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Deception as cause or consequence of language?
BBS 1996 19 (3): 548+.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on
Mathematical
principles of reinforcement.
BBS 1994 17:105-172.
Zeiler, M.D.
What behavers do.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 549+.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Secure footing.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 550+.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Bridgeman, B., Van
der Heijden, A.H.C. & Velichkovsky, B.M.
A
theory of visual stability across saccadic eye movements.
BBS 1994 17: 247-292.
Burr, D.C.
Suppression of motion during saccades.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 551+.
Hershberger, W.A.,
The phantom array.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 552+.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Bridgeman, B., Van der Heijden, A.H.C.,
Velichkovsky, B.M.
Relationship of saccadic suppression to space constancy.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 553+.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Shanks, D.R. &
St. John, M.f.
Characteristics
of dissociable human learning systems.
BBS 1994 17: 367-447.
Furedy, J.J., Kristjansson, M.
Human Pavlovian autonomic conditioning and its relation to awareness of the
CS/US contingency: Focus on the phenomenon and some forgotten facts.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 555+.
Kugel, P.
Implicit learning from a computer-science perspective.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 556+.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Shanks, D.R.,
Implicit learning: What does it all mean?
BBS 1996 19 (3): 557+.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Humphreys, M.S.,
Wiles, J. & Dennis, S.
Toward
a theory of human memory: Data structures and access processes
BBS 1994 17: 655-692.
Colonius, H.
Set theoretic foundations for a theory of human memory.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 559+.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Dennis, S., Humphreys, M.S.,
Wiles, J.
Mathematical constraints on a theory of human memory.
BBS 1996 19 (3): 559+.
Volume 19 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLE
Heyman, G.M.
Resolving the contradictions of addiction.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 561+.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Ainslie,
G.
How do people choose between local and global bookkeeping?
BBS 1996 19 (4): 574+.
Bergman, J., Miczek, K.A.
The ameliorating addict: An illusion reviewed.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 575-576.
Berridge, K.C., Robinson, T.E.
Control versus causation of addiction.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 576+.
Branch, M.N.
Matching and melioration as accounts of reinforcement and drug addiction.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 577+.
Fantino, E.
The behavioral economics of addiction: A comprehensive alternative.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 578+.
Foss, J.
A scientific fix for the classical account of addiction.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 579+.
Higgins, S.T.
Behavioral choice theory can enhance our understanding of drug dependence and
other behavioral disorders.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 579+.
Hinson, R.E.
Who determines the value of drug-taking behavior? Cultural considerations for a
theory of behavioral choice.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 580+.
Melioration and addiction.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 581+.
Hyman, S.E.
Addiction: Taking the brain seriously.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 582+.
Kirby, K.N.
Future directions for the melioration model of addiction.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 583-583.
Laibson, D.I.
An economic perspective on addiction and matching.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 583+.
Logue, A.W.
Self-control and impulsiveness: Resolution of apparent contradictions in choice
behavior.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 584+.
McCauley, C.
Understanding addiction: Conventional rewards and lack of control.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 585-586.
MacCoun,
R.J.
Is melioration the addiction theory of choice?
BBS 1996 19 (4): 586-587.
McFarland,
D.
Who is at risk for addiction?
BBS 1996 19 (4): 587+.
McKim, W.A.
Positive reinforcement, the matching law and morality.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 587+.
Meisch, R.A., Spiga, R.
Relationship between melioration and the controlling variables.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 588-589.
Mitchell, S.H., Baum, W.M.
Maximization should sometimes lead to abstinence.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 589-590.
Nevin, J.A.
Stimulus factors in addiction.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 590+.
Orford, J.
Addiction is not as puzzling as it seems.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 591+.
Perring, C.
Addiction requires philosophical explanation, not mere redescription.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 592-593.
Plaud, J.J.
In search of the relevant behavioral variables.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 593-593.
Robinson,
T.E., Berridge, K.C..
The pursuit of value: sensitization or tolerance?
BBS 1996 19 (4): 594+.
Schelling, T.C.
The contradiction unresolved.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 595-595.
Shizgal, P.
The Janus faces of addiction.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 595+.
Swift, R.M.
Matching observation to addiction theory.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 596+.
Vuchinich, R.E.
Addiction as choice? Yes. As melioration? Maybe, maybe not.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 597+.
Heyman's steady-state theory of addiction.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 598+.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Heyman, G.M.
Which behavioral consequences matter? The importance of frame of reference in
explaining addiction.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 599+.
TARGET ARTICLE
Müller, R.-A.
Innateness, autonomy, universality? Neurobiological approaches to language.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 611+.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Bickerton, D.
An innate language faculty needs neither modularity nor localization.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 631+.
Bullinaria, J.A., Chater, N.
Double dissociation, modularity, and distributed organization.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 632+.
Corballis, M.C.
How to grow a human.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 632+.
Corina, D.
Sign language and the brain: Apes, apraxia, and aphasia.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 633+.
Friederici, A.D.
Autonomy of syntactic processing and the role of Broca's area.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 634+.
Gopnik, M.
Familial language impairment: The evidence.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 635+.
Graham, S., Poulindubois, D.
Speaking of language: Thoughts on associations.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 636+.
Grodzinsky, Y.
Neurobiological approaches to language: Falsehoods and fallacies.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 637+.
Hauser, M.D., Sakata, J.
A worthy enterprise injured by overinterpretation and misrepresentation.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 638+.
Jacobs, B., Larsen, L.
Pluripotentiality, epigenesis, and language acquisition.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 639+.
Kemmerer, D.
Innateness, autonomy, universality, and the neurobiology of regular and
irregular inflectional morphology.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 639+.
Lieberman, P.
Neuroanatomical structures and segregated circuits.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 641+.
Newmeyer, F.J.
Müller's conclusions and linguistic research.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 641+.
Poeppel, D.
Neurobiology and linguistics are not yet unifiable.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 642+.
Pulvermüller, F., Mohr, B., Preissl, H.
Biology of language: Principle, predictions, and evidence.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 643+.
River-Gaxiola, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A.
It's far cry from speech to language.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 645+.
Schoenemann, P.T., Wang, W.S.-Y.
Evolutionary principles and the emergence of syntax.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 646+.
Sinha, C.
Autonomy and its discontents.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 647+.
Smith, N.
A polyglot perspective on dissociation.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 648+.
Stromswold, K.
Genes, specificity, and the lexical/functional distinction in language
acquisition.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 648+.
Is human language just another neurobiological specialization?
BBS 1996 19 (4): 649+.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Müller, R.-A.
The epigenesis of regional specificity.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 650+.
TARGET ARTICLE
Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in
contemporary research.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 677+.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Archibald, J., Guilfoyle, E., Ritter,
E.
Functional categories in L2 acquisition: Evidence of presence is not
necessarily presence of evidence.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 714+.
Bhatt, R.M., Hancinbhatt, B.
Transfer in L2 grammars.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 715+.
Bickerton, D.
A dim monocular view of Universal-Grammar access.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 716+.
Birdsong, D.
Full access to the evidence for falsification.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 717+.
Bley-Vroman, R.
What we have to explain in foreign language learning.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 718+.
Borer, H.
Access to Universal Grammar: The real issues.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 718+.
Carroll, S.E.
Parameter-setting in second language acquisition – explanans and explanandum.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 720+.
Clahsen, H, muysken, P.
How adult second language learning differs from child first language
development.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 721+.
DeGraff, M.
UG and acquisition in pidginization and creolization.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 723+.
Eubank, L.
Methodological problems with Epstein, Flynn, and Martohardjono's research.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 724+.
Freidin, R.
Adult language acquisition and Universal Grammar.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 725+.
Gregg, K.R.
UG and
BBS 1996 19 (4): 726+.
Grewendorf,
G.
Does second language grow?
BBS 1996 19 (4): 727+.
Hale,
K.
Can UG and L1 be distinguished in L2 acquisition?
BBS 1996 19 (4): 728+.
Hale, M.
Competence and performance in language acquisition.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 730+.
Harrington, M.
L2 access to UG: Now you see it, now you don't.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 731+.
Kanno, K.
In support of the early presence of functional categories in second language
acquisition.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 732+.
Li, P.
Why don't L2 learners end up with uniform and perfect linguistic competence? BBS
1996 19 (4): 733+.
Liceras, J.M.
To ''grow'' and what ''to grow,'' that is one question.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 734+.
Lieberman, P.
Universal Grammar and critical periods: A most amusing paradox.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 735+.
MacWhinney, B.
Language is learned.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 735+.
Newmeyer, R.J.
Some incorrect implications of the full-access hypothesis.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 736+.
O’Grady, W.
Syntactic representations and the L2 acquisition device.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 737+.
Otero,
C.P.
Language growth after puberty?
BBS 1996 19 (4): 738+.
Schwartz,
B.D.
Now for some facts, with a focus on development and an explicit role for the L1.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 739+.
Sharwood Smith, M.A.
Metalinguistic ability and primary linguistic data.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 740+.
Sorace, A.
On gradience and optionality in non-native grammars.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 741+.
Sprouse, R.A.
Appreciating the poverty of the stimulus in second language acquisition.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 742+.
Thomas, M.
''Full access'' and the history of linguistics.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 743+.
Torrego, E.
Towards characterizing what the L2 learner knows.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 744+.
Vainikka, A., Young-Scholten, M.
Partial transfer, not partial access.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 744+.
White, L.
UG, the L1, and questions of evidence.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 745+.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Epstein, S.D, Flynn, S,
Martohardjono, G.
Universal Grammar and second language acquisition: The null hypothesis.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 746+.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Jeannerod, M.
The
representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery.
BBS 1994 17: 187-245.
Alternative origins of motor images.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 759+.
Kohl, R.M., Fisicaro,
Response intention and imagery processes: Locus, interaction, and contribution
to motor learning.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 760+.
Rossetti, Y., Rode, G.
In search of nonvisual motor images.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 762+.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Jeannerod,
M.
Motor representations: One or many?
BBS 1996 19 (4): 763+.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Eichenbaum, H.,
Otto, T. & Cohen N.J.
Two
functional components of the hippocampal memory system.
BBS 1994 17:449-517.
Hippocampus, delay neurons, and sensory heterogeneity.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 766+.
Crusio, W.E.
The hunting of the hippocampal function.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 767+.
Moscovitch, M.
Recovered consciousness: A proposal for making consciousness integral to
neuropsychological theories of memory in humans and nonhumans.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 768+.
Mumby, D.G.
Sequential processing of ''items'' and ''relations''.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 770+.
Toates, F.
The hippocampus seen in the context of declarative and procedural control.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 771+.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Eichenbaum, H., Otto, T.,
The hippocampal system: Dissociating its functional components and recombining
them in the service of declarative memory.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 772+.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on
Reintroducing
group selection to the human behavioral sciences.
BBS 1994 17: 585-654.
Barresi, J.
Group selection and ''the pious gene''.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 777+.
Jones, D.
Varieties of group selection.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 778+.
Lamb,
M.E.
What is selected in group selection?
BBS 1996 19 (4): 779+.
Palmer,
C.T., Fredrickson, B.E., Tilley, C.F.
Group selection or categorical perception?
BBS 1996 19 (4): 780+.
van de Wetering, S.
Authoritarianism as a group-level adaptation in humans.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 780+.
Waller, M.
Genier than thou.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 781+.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
More on group selection and human behavior.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 782+.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Wilkins, W.K. &
Wakefield, J.
Brain
evolution and neurolinguistic preconditions.
BBS 1995 18: 161-226.
Lynch,
M.P.
And what of human musicality?
BBS 1996 19 (4): 788+.
Tobias, P.V.
The dating of linguistic beginnings.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 789+.
Westergaard, G.C.
The lithic technology of Cebus apella
and its implications for brain evolution and the preconditions of language in Homo habilis.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 792+.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Wilkins, W.K.,
Further issues in neurolinguistic preconditions.
BBS 1996 19 (4): 793+.