Volume 17 – Issue 01 – March 1994

TARGET ARTICLE

Baron, J.
Nonconsequentialist decisions.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 1-10.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Adler, J.E.
Fairness to policies, distinctions, and intuitions.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 10-11.

Arkes, H.R.
Three reservations about consequentialism.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 11-12.

Ayton, P., Harvey, N.
Inappropriate judgements: Slips mistakes or violations.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 12-12.

Cohen, L.J.
Do, or should, all human decisions conform to the norms of a consumer-oriented culture?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 12-13.

Daniel, S.
Correct decisions and their good consequences.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 13-14.

Dwyer, S.
Why care where moral intuitions come from?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 14-15.

Evans, J.St.B.T.
Normative and descriptive consequentialism.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 15-16.

Frisch, D.
Consequentialism and utility theory.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 16-16.

Fuller, S.
Is consequentialism better regarded as a form of reasoning or as a pattern of behavior?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 16-17.

Glymour, C.
Moral errors.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 17-18.

Grush, R.
Consequences of consequentialism.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 18-19.

Heil, J.
Truth or consequences.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 19-20.

Irwin, J.R.
Elicitation rules and incompatible goals.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 20-21.

Jackson, F.
Departing from consequentialism versus departing from decision theory.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 21-21.

Katz, L.D.
On begging the question when naturalizing norms.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 21-22.

Levy, S.S.
Baron,jonathan consequentialism and error theory.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 22-23.

McCain, R.A.
Consequentialism in haste.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 23-24.

Morton, A.
Does consequentialism pay?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 24-24.

Oatley, K.
Side effects: Limitations of human rationality.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 24-25.

Phillips, G.M.
Some examples of nonconsequentialist decisions.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 25-26.

Pietroski, P.M.
A “should” too many.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 26-27.

Railton, P.
Broadening the base for bringing cognitive psychology to bear on ethics.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 27-28.

Ritov, I.
Can goals be uniquely defined?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 28-29.

Schick, F.
Goals, values, and benefits.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 29-29.

Spranca, M.D.
What goals are to count?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 29-30.

Teigen, K.H.
Actions, inactions, and the temporal dimension.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 30-31.

Tetlock, P.E.
The consequences of taking consequentialism seriously.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 31-32.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Baron, J.
Normative, descriptive and prescriptive responses.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 32-39.

TARGET ARTICLE

Farah, M.J.
Neuropsychological inference with an interactive brain: A critique of the “locality” assumption.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 43-61.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Bullinaria, J.A.
Simulating non-local systems: Rules of the game.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 61-62.

Burton, A.M., Bruce, V.
Local representations without the locality assumption.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 62-63.

Butterworth, B.
Regional specialities.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 63-63.

Campbell, J.I.D.
Locality, modularity, and numerical cognition.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 63-64.

Campbell, R.
Discarding locality assumptions: Problems and prospects.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 64-65.

Carey, D.P., Milner, A.D.
Casting one’s net too widely?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 65-66.

Clark, J.M.
Modularity, abstractness, and the interactive brain.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 67-68.

Chater, N.
Modularity, interaction and connectionist neuropsychology.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 67-68.

Davidoff, J., Renault, B.
Further advantages of abandoning the locality assumption in face recognition.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 68-68.

Diederich, J.
Neurocomputing and modularity.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 68-69.

Glymour, C.
Clarifying the locality assumption.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 69-70.

Grodzinsky, Y., Hadar, U.
No threat to modularity.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 70-71.

Humphreys, G.W., Riddoch, M.J.
Go with the flow but mind the details.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 71-72.

Kinsbourne, M.
Do neuropsychologists think in terms of interactive models?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 72-73.

McCarthy, R.A.
Neuropsychology: Going loco?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 73-74.

Mesulam, M.M.
Distributed locality and large-scale neurocognitive networks.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 74-76.

Oaksford, M.
Computational levels again.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 76-77.

Plaut, D.C.
Parallel distributed processing challenges the strong modularity hypothesis, not the locality assumption.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 77-78.

Posner, M.I.
Local and distributed processes in attentional orienting.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 78-79.

Sekuler, R.
Perception and its interactive substrate: Psychophysical linking hypotheses and psychophysical methods.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 79-80.

Semenza, C.
Locus-pocus (which and whose locality assumption?)
BBS 1994 17 (1): 80-80.

Servos, P., Olds, E.M.
Throwing out the neuropsychological data with the locality bathwater?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 80-81.

Small, S.L.
The real functional architecture is gray, wet, and slippery.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 81-82.

Umiltà, C.
The functional architecture of visual attention may still be modular.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 82-83.

van Gelder, T.
Playing Flourens to Fodor’s Gall.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 84-84.

Van Gulick, R.
Prosopagnosia, conscious awareness and the interactive brain.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 84-85.

van Hezewijk, R., Dehaan, E.H.F.
The symbolic brain or the invisible hand?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 85-86.

Wasserman, G.S.
The localization/distribution distinction in neuropsychology is related to the isomorphism/multiple meaning contradistinction in cell electrophysiology.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 87-88.

Young, A.W.
What counts as local?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 88-89.

Zurif, E., Swinney, D.
Modularity need not imply locality: Damaged modules can have nonlocal effects.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 89-90.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Farah, M.J.
Interactions on the interactive brain.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 90-100.

TARGET ARTICLE

Killeen, P.R.
Mathematical principles of reinforcement.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 105-135.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Bolles, R.C.
The response problem.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 135-136.

Bradshaw, C.M.
Validation of behavioural equations: Can neurobiology help?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 136-137.

Davis, H.
What defines a legitimate issue for Skinnerian psychology: Philosophy or technology?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 137-138.

Donahoe, J.W.
What do reinforcers strengthen? The unit of selection.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 138-139.

Galbicka, G.
Moving beyond schedules and rate: A new trajectory?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 139-140.

Gregson, R.A.M.
Has learning been shown to be attractor modification within reinforcement modeling?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 140-141.

Hanson, S.J.
Reinforcement without representation.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 141-142.

Krank, M.D.
Integration and specificity of retrieval in a memory-based model of reinforcement.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 142-143.

Lattal, K.A., Abreurodrigues, J.
Memories and functional response units.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 143-144.

Metzger, M.A., Sagvolden, T.
Killeen’s theory provides an answer – and a question.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 144-145.

Nevin, J.A.
Extension to multiple schedules: Some surprising (and accurate) predictions.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 145-146.

Pear, J.J.
Problems and pitfalls for Killeen’s mathematical principles of reinforcement.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 146-147.

Rachlin, H.
From overt behavior to hypothetical behavior to memory: Inference in the wrong direction.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 147-148.

Reed, P.
Memory and the integration of response sequences.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 148-149.

Shimp, C.P.
Awareness and reinforcement.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 149-150.

Shull, R.L.
Practical effects of response specification.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 150-150.

Stephens, D.W.
The scale of nature: Fitted parameters and dimensional correctness.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 150-152.

Svartdal, F.
Short-term memory in human operant conditioning.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 152-153.

Timberlake, W.
Animal-centered models of reinforcement.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 153-154.

Walker, S.F.
How general is a general theory of reinforcement?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 154-155.

Wilkie, D.M., Saksida, L.M.
A mathematical theory of reinforcement: An unexpected place to find support for analogical memory coding.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 155-156.

Wearden, J.H.
50 years on: The new “principles of behavior”?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 155-155.

Wynne, C.D.L.
The return of the reinforcement theorists.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 156-156.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Killeen, P.R.
Rats, responses and reinforcers: Using a little psychology on our subjects.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 157-167.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Previc, F.H.

Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications.

BBS 1990 13: 519-575.

Whishaw, I.Q.
How do primates reach?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 173-174.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Previc, F.H.
Neuropsychology and the art of reaching.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 174-175.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Dennett, D.C. & Kinsbourne, M.

Time and the observer: The where and when of consciousness in the brain.

BBS 1992 15: 183-247.

Bogen, J.E.
Descartes’ fundamental mistake: Introspective singularity.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 175-176.

Johnsen, B.C.
A model devoid of consciousness.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 176-177.

Revonsuo, A.
The “Multiple Drafts” model and the ontology of consciousness.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 177-178.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Dennett, D.C., Kinsbourne, M.
Counting consciousnesses: None, one, two, or none of the above?
BBS 1994 17 (1): 178-180.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Pinker, S. & Bloom, P.

Natural language and natural selection.

BBS 1990 13: 707-784.

Gomila, A.
The functionality of the study of language origin.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 180-182.

Sussman, H.M.
Let’s get down to the “wetware” and look at evolutionarily motivated mechanisms.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 182-183.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Pinker, S., Bloom, P.
Humans did not evolve from bats.
BBS 1994 17 (1): 183-185.

Volume 17 – Issue 02 – June 1994

TARGET ARTICLE

Jeannerod, M.
The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 187-202.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Bajcsy, R.
Do object affordances represent the functionality of an object?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 202-202.

Buneo, C.A., Flanders, M.
On the limitations of imaging imagining.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 202-203.

Chua, R., Weeks, D.J.
Cognitive and motor implications of mental imagery.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 203-204.

Contreras-Vidal, J.L., Banquet, J.P., Brebion, J., Smith, M.J.
The creative brain: Symmetry breaking in motor imagery.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 204-205.

Corcos, D.M.
Temporal representation in the control of movement.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 206-206.

Dufour, R., Fischer, M.H., Rosenbaum, D.A.
Moving beyond imagination.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 206-207.

Elliott, D., Maraj, B.K.V.
Visual-spatial movement goals.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 207-207.

Fuster, J.M.
Call it what it is: Motor memory.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 208-208.

Gandevia, S.C.
Peripheral and central correlates of attempted voluntary movements.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 208-209.

Grush, R.
Motor models as steps to higher cognition.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 209-210.

Hallett, M., Fieldman, J., Cohen, L.G., Sadato, N., & Pascual-Leone, A.
Involvement of primary motor cortex in motor imagery and mental practice.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 210-210.

Ingvar, D.H.
Motor memory – a memory of the future.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 210-211.

Jackendoff, R., Landau, B.
What is coded in parietal representations?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 211-212.

Kainen, P.C.
Synergy versus schema.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 212-212.

Klatzky, R.L.
On the relation between motor imagery and visual imagery.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 212-213.

Milner, A.D., Carey, D.P., Harvey, M.
Visually guided action and the “need to know.”
BBS 1994 17 (2): 213-214.

Mitchell, R.W.
Are motor images based on kinesthetic-visual matching?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 214-215.

Morton, A.
Motor simulation.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 215-215.

Pailhous, J., Bonnard, M.
Jeannerod’s representing brain: Image or illusion?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 215-216.

Pellizzer, G., Georgopoulos, A.P.
Representations of movement and representations in movement.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 216-217.

Prinz, W.
Motor images are action plans.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 218-218.

Requin, J.
To dream is not to (intend to) do.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 218-219.

Rizzolatti, G.
Nonconscious motor images.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 220-220.

Roll, J.P., Gilhodes, J.C., Roll, R.
Kinaesthetic illusions as tools in understanding motor imagery.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 220-221.

Sanes, J.N.
Neurophysiology of preparation, movement, and imagery.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 221-223.

Sinha, C.
Canonical representations and constructive praxis: Some developmental and linguistic considerations.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 223-224.

Skokowski, P.G.
How do we satisfy our goals?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 224-224.

Strong, G.W.
Separability of reference frame distinctions from motor and visual images.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 224-225.

Van der Heijden, A.H.C., Bridgeman, B.
Action and attention.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 225-226.

Vogt, S.
Imagery needs preparation, too.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 226-227.

Walter, C.B., Swinnen, S.P.
Potential disparities between imagining and preparing motor skills.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 227-228.

Whiting, H.T.A., Ingvaldsen, R.P.
The mystery-mastery-imagery complex.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 228-229.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Jeannerod, M.
Motor representations and reality.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 229-238.

TARGET ARTICLE

Bridgeman, B., Vanderheijden, A.H.C., Velichkovsky, B.M.
A theory of visual stability across saccadic eye movements.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 247-258.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Chekaluk, E.
Is there a role for extraretinal factors in the maintenance of stability in a structured environment?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 258-258.

Dassonville, P., Schlag, J., Schlagrey, M.
Just how different are perceptual and visuomotor localization abilities?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 258-259.

Deubel, H., Schneider, W.X.
Perceptual stability and postsaccadic visual information: Can man bridge a gap?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 259-260.

Enright, J.T.
Voluntary oscillopsia: Watching the world go round.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 260-262.

Grüsser, O.J.
Early concepts on efference copy and reafference.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 262-265.

Harris, L.R.
Keeping track of visual codes that move from cell to cell during eye movements.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 265-265.

Irwin, D.E., McConkie, G.W., Carlson-Radvansky, L.A., Currie, C.A.
A localist evaluation solution for visual stability across saccades.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 265-266.

Jüttner, M.
Visual stability and transsaccadic information processing.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 266-267.

Karn, K.S., Lachter, J., Moller, P., Hayhoe, M.
Task dependent spatial memory across saccades.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 267-268.

Mateeff, S., Hohnsbein, J.
Is there any essential difference between the “calibration” and “elimination” solutions?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 268-269.

Mittelstaedt, H.
Theory of coordinate transformation by efference copy survives another attack.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 269-270.

O’Regan, J.K.
The world as an outside iconic memory: No strong internal metric means no problem of visual stability.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 270-271.

Owens, D.A., Reed, E.S.
Seeing where we look: Fixation as extraretinal information.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 271-272.

Paillard, J., Fleury, M., Teasdale, N., Bard, C., and others.
The perceptual stability of the visual field: What is calibration for?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 272-272.

Petrov, A.P.
The calibration solution still leaves much work to be done.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 273-274.

Pouget, A., Sejnowski, T.J.
Is perception isomorphic to neural activity?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 274-274.

Prablanc, C.
Neuronal death of the cancellation theory?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 274-275.

Robinson, D.N.
On the locus of visual stability.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 275-276.

Shebilske, W.L.
Calibration models and ecological efference mediation theory: Toward a synthesis of indirect and direct perception theories.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 276-277.

Smeets, J.B.J., Brenner, E.
Stability relative to what?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 277-278.

Sokolov, E.N.
Vector code in space constancy.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 278-278.

Stoper, A.E.
The translation solution plus motion suppression account for perceived stability.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 278-279.

Strong, G.W.
There is no “point” to space.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 279-279.

Trehub, A.
What does calibration solve?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 279-280.

van Donkelaar, P., Windhorst, U.
Visual stability: What is new?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 280-281.

Wertheim, A.H.
Fixations or smooth eye movements?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 281-282.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Bridgeman, B., Van der Heijden, A.H.C., Velichkovsky, B.M.
How our world remains stable despite disturbing influences.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 282-287.

TARGET ARTICLE

Wertheim, A.H.
Motion perception during self-motion: The direct versus inferential controversy revisited.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 293-311.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Andersen, G.J.
The analysis of information for 3-D motion perception: The role of eye movements.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 311-312.

Becker, W., Mergner, T.
A theory of the perceptual stability of the visual world rather than of motion perception.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 312-313.

Belopolsky, V.I.
Frame and metrics for the reference signal.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 313-314.

Boothe, R.G.
Biological perception of self-motion.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 314-315.

Bridgeman, B., Blouin, J.
Extending reference signal theory to rapid movements.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 315-316.

Büttner, U., Straube, A.
Ego- and object-motion perception: Where does it take place?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 316-317.

Coombs, D.
Sensor fusion in motion perception.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 317-318.

Gregson, R.A.M.
Ambiguities in mathematically modelling the dynamics of motion perception.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 318-319.

da Vitoria Lobo, N.
Direct perception theory needs to include computational reasoning, not extraretinal information.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 318-318.

Hadani, I., Julesz, B.
Computational aspects of motion perception during self-motion.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 319-320.

Held, R.
The inferential model of motion perception during self-motion cannot apply at constant velocity.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 320-321.

Honda, H.
Some problems on the gain of the reference signal.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 321-322.

Kim, N.-G., Turvey, M.T.
Optical foundations of perceived ego motion.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 322-323.

Mateeff, S., Hohnsbein, J.
Wertheim’s “reference” signal: Successful in explaining perception of absolute motion, but how about relative motion.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 323-324.

Previc, F.H.
Inferring the visual reference.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 324-325.

Probst, T.
Why again an alternative model?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 325-326.

Riccio, G.E.
Perception of motion with respect to multiple criteria.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 326-328.

Rieser, J.J.
Ego-centered and environment-centered perceptions of self-movement.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 328-329.

Ross, H.E.
Active and passive head and body movements.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 329-330.

Sauvan, X.M.
What does linear vection tells us about the optokinetic pathway?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 330-330.

Shebilske, W.L,
Ecological efference mediation theory and motion perception during self-motion.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 330-331.

Skavenski, A.A.
The idea that space perception involves more than eye movement signals and the position of the retinal image has come up before.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 331-332.

Stoffregen, T.A.
“Sensory” reference frames and the information for self-motion versus object motion.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 332-333.

Stoper, A.E.
Does the reference signal cancel visual field motion?
BBS 1994 17 (2): 333-334.

Swanston, M.
Spatial motion perception requires the perception of distance.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 334-335.

Their, P., Erickson, R.G., Dichgans, J.
A cortical substrate for motion perception during self-motion.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 335-335.

Tresilian, J.R.
Two straw men stay silent when asked about the “direct” versus “inferential” controversy.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 335-337.

Velichkovsky, B.M., Vanderheijden, A.H.C.
Space as reference signal? Elaborate it in depth!
BBS 1994 17 (2): 337-338.

Wann, J., Rushton, S.
The illusion of self-motion in virtual reality environments.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 338-340.

Yardley, L.
The significance of the active pick-up of information in ecological theories of motion perception.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 340-340.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Wertheim, A.H.
Motion perception: Rights, wrongs and further speculations.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 340-348.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Greenfield, P.M.

Language, tools and brain: The Ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior

BBS 1991 14: 531-595.

Andreae, J.H., Ryan, S.W.
Associative learning and task complexity.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 357-358.

Pepperberg, I.M.
Language and cognition: The interesting case of subjects “P.”
BBS 1994 17 (2): 359-359.

Westergaard, G.C.
Language, tools, and neurobehavioral laterality.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 360-361.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Piñon, D., Greenfield, P.M.
Does everybody do it? Hierarchically organized sequential activity in robots, birds and monkeys.
BBS 1994 17 (2): 361-365.

Volume 17 – Issue 03 – September 1994

TARGET ARTICLE

Shanks, D.R., St. John, M.F.
Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 367-395.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Andrade, J.
Is learning during anaesthesia implicit?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 395-396.

Baeyens, F., Dehouwer, J., Eelen, P.
Awareness inflated, evaluative conditioning underestimated.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 396-397.

Berry, D.C.
A step too far?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 397-398.

Bornstein, R.F.
Are subliminal mere exposure effects a form of implicit learning?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 398-399.

Brody, N., Crowley, M.J.
Of what are we aware?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 399-399.

Catania, A.C.
The aware pigeon.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 400-401.

Carlson, R.A.
Is implicit learning about consciousness?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 400-400.

Cleeremans, A.
Awareness and abstraction are graded dimensions.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 402-403.

Dienes, Z., Perner, J.
Dissociable definitions of consciousness.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 403-404.

Ennen, E.
Implicit practical learning.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 404-405.

Goldstone, R.L., Kruschke, J.K.
Are rules and instances subserved by separate systems?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 405-405.

Holyoak, K.J., Gattis, M.
Implicit assumptions about implicit learning.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 406-407.

Howe, M.L., Rabinowitz, F.M.
Development, learning, and consciousness.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 407-407.

Kimmel, H.D.
Human autonomic conditioning without awareness.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 408-408.

Kourtzi, Z., Oliver, L.M., Gluck, M.A.
Can procedural learning be equated with unconscious learning or ruled based learning?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 408-409.

Lachter, J.
Consciousness in natural language and motor learning.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 409-410.

Lindsay, R.O., Gorayska, B.
Tacit knowledge and verbal report: On sinking ships and saving babies.

BBS 1994 17 (3): 410-411.

Marsolek, C.J.
Implementational constraints on human learning and memory systems.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 411-412.

Merikle, P.M.
On the futility of attempting to demonstrate null awareness.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 412-412.

Nagata, H.
Faulty rationale for the two dimensions to dissociate learning systems.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 412-413.

Packard, M.G.
Dissociating multiple memory systems: Don’t forsake the brain.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 414-415.

Overskeid, G.
The intuitive mind.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 414-414.

Perruchet, P., Gallego, J.
What about unconscious processing during the test?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 415-416.

Poldrack, R.A., Cohen, N.J.
On the representational/computational properties of multiple memory systems.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 416-417.

Rakover, S.S.
Learning without awareness: What counts as an appropriate test of learning and of awareness?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 417-418.

Reber, A.S., Winter, B.
What manner of mind is this?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 418-419.

Reed, J., Johnson, P.
New evidence for unconscious sequence learning.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 419-420.

Rizzo, A., Parlangeli, O.
Learning strategies and situated knowledge.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 420-421.

Seger, C.A.
Criteria for implicit learning: Deemphasize conscious access,
emphasize amnesia.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 421-422.

Squire, L.R., Hamann, S., Knowlton, B.
Dissociable learning and memory systems of the brain.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 422-423.

Stadler, M.A., Frensch, P.A.
Whither learning, whither memory?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 423-424.

Svartdal, F.
Is awareness necessary for operant conditioning?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 424-425.

Terrace, H.S.
Are infants human?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 425-426.

Willingham, D.B.
On the creation of classification systems of memory.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 426-427.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Shanks, D.R., St. John, M.F.
How should implicit learning be characterized?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 427-447.

TARGET ARTICLE

Eichenbaum, H., Otto, T., Cohen, N.J.
Two functional components of the hippocampal memory system.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 449-472.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Aggleton, J.P.
Is Eichenbaum et al.’s proposal testable and how extensive is the hippocampal memory system?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 472-473.

Bingman, V.P.
Remembering spatial cognition as a hippocampal functional component.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 473-474.

Bolhuis, J.J., Reid, I.C.
The hippocampal system, time, and memory representations.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 474-474.

Brown, M.W.
Recording the recognition due to the parahippocampal region places hippocampal relational encoding in context.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 474-476.

Gluck, M.A., Myers, C.E., Goebel, J.K.
A computational perspective on dissociating hippocampal and entorhinal function.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 476-477.

Fuster, J.M.
In search of the engrammer.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 476-476.

Good, M.A., Morris, R.G.M.
A step linking memory to understanding?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 477-478.

Gray, J.A., Sinden, J., Hodges, H.
Psychoarithmetic or pick your own?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 478-479.

Grossberg, S.
Hippocampal modulation of recognition, conditioning, timing, and space: Why so many functions?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 479-480.

Hampson, R.E., Deadwyler, S.A.
Hippocampal representations of DMS/DNMS in the rat.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 480-482.

Horel, J.A.
The localization of general memory functions.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 482-482.

Humphreys, M.S., Dennis, S.
Going from task descriptions to memory structures.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 483-483.

Jarrard, L.E.
A call for greater concern regarding the underlying anatomy.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 483-484.

Katz, D.B., Steinmetz, J.E.
How long do relational representations in the hippocampus last during classical eyelid conditioning.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 484-485.

Kesner, R.P.
Hippocampus and memory for time.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 485-486.

Mayes, A.R.
What exactly do amnesics fail to store normally?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 486-487.

McNaughton, N.
The hippocampus: Relational processor or antiprocessor.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 487-488.

Miller, E.K.
Neocortical memory traces.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 488-489.

Murray, E.A.
Relational but not spatial memory: The task at hand.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 489-490.

Nadel, L.
Hippocampus, space, and relations.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 490-491.

Rapp, P.R.
Functional components of the hippocampal memory system: Implications for future learning and memory research in nonhuman primates.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 491-492.

Rawlins, J.N.P., Deacon, R.M.J., Yee, B.K., Cassaday, H.J.
Does it still make sense to develop a declarative memory theory of hippocampal function?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 492-493.

Shapiro, M.L.
From Heisenberg’s cat to Eichenbaum’s rat: Uncertainty in predicting the neural requirements for animal behavior.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 493-494.

Solomon, P.R., Yang, B.Y.
What are the best strategies for understanding hippocampal function?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 494-495.

Squire, L.R., Zolamorgan, S., Alvarez, P.
Functional distinctions within the medial temporal lobe memory system: What is the evidence?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 495-496.

Suzuki, W.A.
What can neuroanatomy tell us about the functional components of the hippocampal memory system?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 496-498.

Tulving, E., Markowitsch, H.J.
What do animal models of memory model?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 498-499.

Wilson, F.A.W.
Hippocampal neuronal activity in rat and primate: Memory and movement.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 499-500.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Eichenbaum, H., Otto, T., Cohen, N.J.
The hippocampal memory system and its functional components: Further explication and clarification.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 500-517.

TARGET ARTICLE

Boden, M.A.
Précis of The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 519-531.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Adams-Price, C.
Can artificial intelligence explain age changes in literary creativity?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 532-532.

Bringsjord, S.
Lady Lovelace had it right: Computers originate nothing.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 532-533.

Bundy, A.
What is the difference between real creativity and mere novelty?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 533-534.

Campbell, R.L.
On doing the impossible.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 535-537.

Burns, B.D.
Analogy programs and creativity.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 535-535.

Dartnall, T.
Creativity, combination and cognition.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 537-537.

Donald, M.
Computation: Part of the problem of creativity.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 537-538.

Dunbar, K., Baker, L.M.
Goals, analogy, and the social constraints of scientific discovery.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 538-539.

Fetzer, J.H.
Creative thinking presupposes the capacity for thought.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 539-540.

Flor, N.V.
What about everyday creativity?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 540-542.

Fulford, K.W.M.
Creativity, madness and extra-strong AI.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 542-543.

Gabora, L.M.
The birth of an idea.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 543-543.

Garnham, A.
Art for art’s sake.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 543-544.

Gilhooly, K.J.
Creativity theory: Detail and testability.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 544-545.

Grasshoff, G.
The historical basis of scientific discovery processes.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 545-546.

Ippolito, M.F.
Conscious thought processes and creativity.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 546-547.

O’Rourke, J.
The generative-rules definition of creativity.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 547-547.

Pind, J.
Computational creativity: What place for literature?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 547-548.

Ram, A., Domeshek, E., Wills, L., Nersessian, N., and others.
Creativity is in the mind of the creator.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 549-549.

Rehkämper, K.
Imagery and creativity.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 550-550.

Rowe, J.
Creativity: Metarules and emergent systems.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 550-551.

Shames, V.A., Kihlstrom, J.F.
Respecting the phenomenology of human creativity.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 551-552.

Simonton, D.K.
Individual differences, developmental changes, and social context.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 552-553.

Sternberg, R.J.
Can computers be creative, or even disappointed?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 553-554.

Treisman, M.
Creativity: Myths? Mechanisms?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 554-555.

van der Maas, H,.L.J., Molenaar, P.C.M.
The empirical detection of creativity.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 555-555.

Weisberg, R.W.
The creative mind versus the creative computer.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 555-557.

Żytkow, J.M.
Machine discoverers: Transforming the spaces they explore.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 557-558.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Boden, M.A.
Creativity: A framework for research.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 558-570.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Cheney, D.L. & Seyfarth, R.M.

Précis of How monkeys see the world.

BBS 1992 15: 135-182.

Bekoff, M., Townsend, S.E., Jamieson, D.
Beyond monkey minds: Towards a richer cognitive ethology.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 571-572.

Gallup, G.G.
Monkeys, mirrors, and minds.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 572-573.

Povinelli, D.J.
A theory of mind is in the head, not the heart.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 573-574.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Cheney, D., Seyfarth, R.
Mirrors and the attribution of mental states.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 574-577.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Kenrick, D.T. & Keefe, R.C.

Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies.

BBS 1992 15: 75-133.

Waller, N.G.
Individual differences in age preferences in mates.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 578-581.

Buss, D.M.
Individual differences in mating strategies.
BBS 1994 17 (3): 581-582.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Kenrick, D.T., Keefe, R.C.
Gender and sexual orientation: Why the different age preferences?
BBS 1994 17 (3): 582-584.

Volume 17 – Issue 04 – December 1994

TARGET ARTICLE

Wilson, D.S., Sober, E.
Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 585-608.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Alroy, J., Levine, A.
Driving both ways: Wilson & Sober’s conflicting criteria for the identification of groups as vehicles of selection.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 608-610.

Batson, C.D.
Seeing the light: What does biology tell us about human social behavior?
BBS 1994 17 (4): 610-611.

Brace, C.L.
The consequences of group selection in a domain without genetic input: Culture.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 611-612.

Bradie, M.
Metaphors and mechanisms in vehicle-based selection theory.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 612-612.

Burghardt, G.M.
Group selection and the group mind in science.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 613-613.

Campbell, D.T., Gatewood, J.B.
Ambivalently held group-optimizing predispositions.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 614-614.

Cloak, F.T.
Unnecessary competition requirement makes group selection harder to demonstrate.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 614-615.

Cronk, L.
Group selection’s new clothes.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 615-616.

Dawkins, R.
Burying the vehicle.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 616-617.

Crow, J.F.
In praise of replicators.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 616-616.

Dennett, D.C.
E pluribus unum?
BBS 1994 17 (4): 617-618.

Dugatkin, L.A.
Subtle ways of shifting the balance in favor of between-group selection.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 618-619.

Dupré, J.
Some philosophical implications of the rehabilitation of group selection.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 619-620.

Frank, R.H.
Group selection and “genuine” altruism.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 620-621.

Gilbert, M.
You, me, and us: Distinguishing “egoism,” “altruism,” and “groupism.”
BBS 1994 17 (4): 621-622.

Goodnight, C.J.
Contextual analysis and group selection.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 622-622.

Grantham, T.A.
Putting the cart back behind the horse: Group selection does not require that groups be “organisms.”
BBS 1994 17 (4): 622-623.

Griffiths, P.E., Gray, R.D.
Replicators and vehicles? Or developmental systems?
BBS 1994 17 (4): 623-624.

Heschl, A.
Reconstructing the real unit of selection.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 624-625.

Holcomb, H.R. III
Empirically equivalent theories.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 625-626.

Holsinger, K.E.
Groups as vehicles and replicators: The problem of group-level adaptation.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 626-627.

Hull, D.L.
Taking vehicles seriously.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 627-628.

Hyland, M.E.
Different vehicles for group selection in humans.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 628-628.

Lloyd, E.A.
Rx: Distinguish group selection from group adaptation.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 628-629.

MacDonald, K.
Group evolutionary strategies: Dimensions and mechanisms.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 629-630.

Miller, G.F.
Beyond shared fate: Group-selected mechanisms for cooperation and competition in fuzzy, fluid vehicles.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 630-631.

Moore, J.
Hominids, coalitions and weapons: Not vehicles.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 632-632.

Nesse, R.M.
Why is group selection such a problem?
BBS 1994 17 (4): 633-634.

Simpson, J.A.
Adaptation and natural selection: A new look at some old ideas.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 634-636.

Rapoport, A.
Nongenetic and non-Darwininan evolution.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 634-634.

Smith, E.A.
Semantics, theory, and methodological individualism in the group-selection controversy.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 636-637.

Thompson, N.S.
Vehicles all the way down?
BBS 1994 17 (4): 638-638.

Wills, C.
The maintenance of behavioral diversity in human societies.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 638-639.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Wilson, D.S., Sober, E.
Group selection: The theory replaces the bogey man.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 639-647.

TARGET ARTICLE

Humphreys, M.S., Wiles, J., Dennis, S.
Toward a theory of human memory: Data structures and access processes.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 655-667.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Clarke, T.L.
Inorganic memory.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 667-667.

Golden, R.M.
Strong and weak formal specifications.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 668-668.

Greene, R.L.
Why do we need a computational theory of laboratory tasks?
BBS 1994 17 (4): 668-669.

Heath, R.A.
The cognitive RISC machine needs complexity.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 669-670.

Jacobs, A.M.
On computational theories and multilevel, multitask models of cognition: The case of word recognition.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 670-672.

Kashima, Y.
Memory and social cognition.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 672-673.

Kinoshita, S.
Does a computational theory of human memory need intelligence?
BBS 1994 17 (4): 673-674.

Lewis, R.L.
Task specification language, or theory of human memory?
BBS 1994 17 (4): 674-675.

Murnane, K.
Caught in a bind: Context information and episodic memory.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 675-676.

Murray, D.J.
What are the “goals” of the human memory system?
BBS 1994 17 (4): 676-677.

Myung, I.J.
Is the representation meaningful? A measurement theoretical view.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 677-678.

Oscar-Berman, M.
Brain damage and cognitive dysfunction.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 678-679.

Sloman, S.A.
Progress within the bounds of memory.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 679-680.

Tiberghien, G.
Can we really dissociate the computational and algorithmic-level theories of human memory?
BBS 1994 17 (4): 680-681.

van der Velde, F., Wolters, G., van der Heijden, A.H.C.
Marr versus marr: On the notion of levels.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 681-682.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Humphreys, M.S., Wiles, J., Dennis, S.
Beyond the Tower of Babel in human memory research: The validity and utility of specification.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 682-689.

TARGET ARTICLE

Karmiloff-Smith, A.
Précis of Beyond Modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 693-706.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Bloom, P.
The real problem with constructivism.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 707-708.

Boden, M.A.
Representational redescription: A question of sequence.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 708-708.

Bodor, P., Pléh, C.
A Fodorian guide to Switzerland: Jung and Piaget combined?
BBS 1994 17 (4): 709-710.

Campbell, R.L.
What’s getting redescribed?
BBS 1994 17 (4): 710-711.

Carassa, A., Tirassa, M.
Representational redescription and cognitive architectures.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 711-712.

Dartnall, T.
Redescribing redescription.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 712-713.

de Gelder, B.
The risks of rationalising cognitive development.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 713-714.

Donald, M.
Representation: Ontogenesis and phylogenesis.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 714-715.

Estes, D.
Developmental psychology for the twenty-first century.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 715-716.

Foster-Cohen, S.H.
Arguments against linguistic modularization.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 716-717.

Freeman, N.H.
Redescription of intentionality.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 717-718.

Goldin-Meadow, S., Alibali, M.W.
Do you have to be right to redescribe?
BBS 1994 17 (4): 718-719.

Graham, G.
Dissociation, self-attribution, and redescription.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 719-719.

Grush, R.
Beyond connectionist versus classical AI: A control theoretic perspective on development and cognitive science.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 720-720.

Hampson, P.J.
Representational redescription memory and connections.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 721-721.

Johnston, T.D.
Genes, development, and the “innate” structure of the mind.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 721-722.

Kuhn, D.
The power of explicit knowing.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 722-723.

Losonsky, M.
Beyond methodological solipsism?
BBS 1994 17 (4): 723-724.

Ohlsson, S.
Representational change, generality versus specificity, and nature versus nurture: Perennial issues in cognitive research.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 724-725.

Quartz, S.R., Sejnowski, T.J.
Beyond modularity: Neural evidence for constructivist principles in development.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 725-726.

Olson, D.R.
Where redescriptions come from.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 725-725.

Rutkowska, J.C.
Situating representational redescription in infants’ pragmatic knowledge.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 726-727.

Scholnick, E.K.
Redescribing development.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 727-728.

Shultz, T.R.
The challenge of representational redescription.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 728-729.

Smith, L.
Modal knowledge and transmodularity.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 729-730.

Vinter, A., Perruchet, P.
Is there an implicit level of representation?
BBS 1994 17 (4): 730-731.

Zelazo, P.D.
From the decline of development to the ascent of consciousness.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 731-732.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Karmiloff-Smith, A.
Transforming a partially structured brain into a creative mind.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 732-740.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Dawkins/Singer

From an animal’s point of view: Motivation, fitness, and animal welfare.

BBS 1990 13: 1-61.

Bradshaw, R.H., Bubier, N.E.
The value of the consumer demand model to the science of animal welfare.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 747-748.

Kiley-Worthington, M.
Behavioural restriction, animal welfare and choice experiments.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 748-749.

PRECOMMENTARY AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Singer, P.
How to argue with egg producers.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 749-749.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Plomin, R. & Bergeman, C.S.

The nature of nurture: Genetic influence on “environmental” measures.

BBS 1991 14: 373-427.

Grimshaw, G., Bryden, M.P.
Genetic influences on the environment.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 750-751.

Lamb, M.E.
Heredity, environment, and the question “why”?
BBS 1994 17 (4): 751-751.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Plomin, R., Bergeman, C.S.
More on the nature of nurture.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 751-752.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Golani, I.

A mobility gradient in the organization of vertebrate movement: The perception of movment through symbolic language.

BBS 1992 15: 249-308.

Hadar, U.
Implications of methodological rigor in movement analysis for the study of human communication.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 753-754.

Shepherd, J.K., Dourish, C.T.
Implications of Eshkol-Wachman movement notation for behavioural pharmacology.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 754-754.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Golani, I.
The practicality of using the Eshkol-Wachman movement notation in behavioral pharmacology and kinesics.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 754-756.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Lockhead, G.R.

Psychophysical scaling: Judgments of attributes or objects?

BBS 1992 15: 543-601.

Allik, J.
Is there any difference between attribute- and object-based psychophysics?
BBS 1994 17 (4): 757-759.

Booth, D.A.
Recognition of objects by physical attributes.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 759-760.

Pléh, C.
The relative novelty of judgement relativity.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 760-761.

Runeson, S.
Psychophysics: The failure of an elementaristic dream.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 761-763.

Sarris, V.
Contextual effects in animal psychophysics: Comparative perception.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 763-764.

Wasserman, G.S.
Comparable context effects exist in physical, physiological, and psychophysical scales.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 764-766.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Lockhead, G.R.
Psychophysical measures of objects and their features: It is time for a change.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 766-771.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Johnson-Laird, P.N. & Byrne, R.M.J.

Précis of Deduction.

BBS 1993 16:323-380.

Martin-Cordero, J., Gonzàlez-Labra, M.J.
Amnesic mental models do not completely spill the beans of deductive reasoning.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 773-774.

Smith, L.
Mental models and modality.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 774-775.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Johnson-Laird, P.N., Byrne, R.M.J.
Models, necessity, and the search for counterexamples.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 775-777.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Tomasello, M., Kruger, A.C. & Ratner, H.H.

Cultural Learning.

BBS 1993 16: 495-552.

Chisholm, J.S., Wescombe, N.
Evolution, attachment, and cultural learning.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 778-779.

Keller, H., Chasiotis, A.
”All I really need to know I learned in kindergarten” or is “cultural learning” anthropo-, ethno-, or adultocentric?
BBS 1994 17 (4): 779-780.

Pontecorvo, C.
Rethinking learning processes and products.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 780-781.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Tomasello, M., Kruger, A.C., Ratner, H.H.
The role of emotions in cultural learning.
BBS 1994 17 (4): 782-783.