Volume 11 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLE
Smolensky, P.
On the proper treatment of connectionism.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 1-23.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
On the proper treatment of the connection between connectionism
and symbolism.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 23.
Bechtel, W.
Connectionism and interlevel relations.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 23-25.
Belew, R.K.
Two constructive themes.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 25-26.
Chandrasekaran, B., Goel, A., Allemang, D.
Information processing abstractions: The message still counts more than the
medium.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 26-27.
Cleland, C.E.
Is Smolensky’s treatment of connectionism on the level?
BBS 1988 11 (1): 27-28.
Dellarosa, D.
The psychological appeal of connectionism.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 28.
Dietrich, E., Fields, C.
Some assumptions underlying Smolensky’s treatment of connectionism.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 29-31.
Dreyfus, H.L., Dreyfus, S.E.
On the proper treatment of Smolensky.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 31-32.
Dyer, M.G.
The promise and problems of connectionism.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 32.
Freeman, W.J.
Dynamic systems and the “subsymbolic level.”
BBS 1988 11 (1): 33-34.
Freidin, R.
Connectionism and the study of language.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 34-35.
Golden, R.M.
Statistical rationality.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 35.
Hofstadter, D.R.
Common-sense and conceptual halos.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 35-37.
Hunter, L.E.
Some memory, but no mind.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 37-38.
Hanson, S.J.
On the obvious treatment of connectionism.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 38-39.
Lakoff, G.
Smolensky, semantics, and the sensorimotor system.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 39-40.
Lehnert, W.G.
Physics, cognition, and connectionism: An interdisciplinary alchemy.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 40-41.
Lindsay, R.K.
Can this treatment raise the dead?
BBS 1988 11 (1): 41-42.
Lloyd, D.
Connectionism in the golden age of cognitive science.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 42-43.
Lycan, W.G.
Symbols, subsymbols, neurons.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 43-44.
McCarthy, J.
Epistemological challenges for connectionism.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 44.
Mortenson, C.
In defense of neurons.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 44-45.
Nelson, R.J.
Connections among connections.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 45-46.
Prince, A., Pinker, S.
Subsymbols arent much good outside of a symbol-processing architecture.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 46-47.
Quarton, G.C.
A two-dimensional array of models of cognitive function.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 48.
Rey, G.
Sanity surrounded by madness.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 48-50.
Rueckl, J.G.
Making the connections.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 50-51.
Schneider, W.
Structure and controlling subsymbolic processing.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 51-52.
Shepard, R.N.
How fully should connectionism be activated: Two sources of excitation and one
of inhibition.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 52.
Stich, S.P.
From connectionism to eliminativism.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 53-54.
Stone, G.O.
From data to dynamics: The use of multiple levels of analysis.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 54-55.
Touretzky, D.S.
On the proper treatment of thermostats.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 55-56.
den Uyl, M.J.
The essential opacity of modular systems: Why even connectionism cannot give
complete formal accounts of cognition.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 56-57.
Van Gulick, R.
Has the case been made against the ecumenical view of connectionism?
BBS 1988 11 (1): 57-58.
Woodfield, A., Morton, A.
The reality of the symbolic and subsymbolic systems.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 58.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Smolensky, P.
Putting together connectionism – again.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 59-70.
TARGET ARTICLE
Glezer, I.I., Jacobs, M.S., Morgane, P.J.
Implications of the “initial brain” concept for brain evolution in Cetacea.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 75-89.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Aronson, L.R., Tobach, E.
Conservative aspects of the dolphin cortex match its behavioral
level.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 89-90.
Campbell, C.B.G.
Primitive survivors and neocortical evolution.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 90-91.
Carlson, M.
Evolution of the brain in Cetacea – is bigger better?
BBS 1988 11 (1): 91-92.
Eisenberg, J.F.
Cetacean brains have a structure similar to the brains of primitive mammals;
does this imply limits in function?
BBS 1988 11 (1): 92.
Falk, D.
Allometry cannot be ignored in brain evolution studies.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 92-93.
Gibson, K.R.
Fish, sea snakes, dolphins, teeth and brains some evolutionary paradoxes.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 93-94.
Innocenti, G.M.
Developmental axes and evolutionary trees.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 94-95.
Irsigler, F.J.
Morphogenetic versus morphofunctional theory.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 95-96.
Johnson, J.I.
Whose brain is inital-like?
BBS 1988 11 (1): 96.
Kaas, J.H.
Determining species differences in numbers of cortical areas and modules: The
architectonic methods needs supplementation.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 96-97.
Neafsey, E.J.
The concept of association cortex should be abandoned.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 97.
Parker, S.T.
Putting all cetacean brains in one category is a big order.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 97-98.
Reep, R.L.
The “initial brain”: Initial considerations.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 98-99.
Rensch, B.
What about Sirena?
BBS 1988 11 (1): 99.
Ridgway, S.H., Wood, F.G.
Cetacean brain evolution.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 99-100.
Shoshani, J.
Elephants have a large neocortex too.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 100-101.
Stein, B.E.
Concepts of brain evolution.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 100-102.
Steklis, H.D.
Climbing the evolutionary ladder of success: The scala naturae
in models of brain evolution.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 101-102.
Szentágothai, J.
Elegant hypothesis are intellectually rewarding; even more so if more hard data
were available.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 102.
Valverde, F.
Competition for the sake of diversity.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 102-103.
Wilczynski, W.
Evolutionary events and the “modification/multiplication” relationship.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 103-104.
Wind, J.
Brain evolution: Some problems of interpretation.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 104-105.
Zilles, K., Rehkämper, G.
The initial brain concept: A work in progress.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 105-106.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Glezer, I.I., Jacobs, M.S., Morgane, P.J.
The initial brain concept: Its uses and misuses.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 106-111.
TARGET ARTICLE
A framework for the functional analysis of behavior.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 117-130.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Alexander, R.McN.
The risks of the cause.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 130.
Barnard, C.J.
Policy-making for survival: Reading the rules and small print.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 130-131.
Calder,
BBS 1988 11 (1): 131-133.
Caraco, T.
Fitness, currencies, and models.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 133.
Applications and limitations of dynamic programming in behavioral-theory.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 134.
Dawkins, M.S.
Motivation, decision-making, and choice.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 134-135.
Fantino, E.
Conditioned reinforcement and reproductive success.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 135.
Heiner, R.A.
Adapting canonical costs and robust rules for imperfect decisions.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 135-136.
Heyman, G.M.
Optimization theory: A too narrow path.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 136-137.
Huntingford, F.A., Metcalfe, N.B.
The functional analysis of behavior: Making room for Prufrock.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 137-138.
King, G.R., Logue, A.W.
Norms of behavior: balancing generality with testability.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 138-139.
Mangel, M.
Dynamic theories of behavior.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 139-141.
Morse, D.H.
Behavior and fitness.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 141.
Navarick, D.J.
Is there a preference for variability?
BBS 1988 11 (1): 141-142.
Partridge, L.D.
Evolution of a controller of state!
BBS 1988 11 (1): 142-143.
Powers, W.T.A.
A nonfunctional analysis of behavior.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 143-144.
Rachlin, H.
Biological relevance.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 144.
Reid, A.K.
Realistic versus minimal models.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 144-145.
Scudo, F.M.
Behavior, adaptedness, and Darwinian theories.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 145-146.
Staw, R.E., Carolan, T.F.
Adjoint optimal control.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 146-147.
Sherry, D.F.
Dynamic-programming: From eternity to here.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 147-148.
Sih, A.
On analyzing complex relationships between behavior, state and fitness.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 148-149.
Smith, E.A.
Realism, generality, or testability: The ecological modeler’s dilemma.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 149-150.
Houston & McNamara are right, but are they helpful to empiricists?
BBS 1988 11 (1): 150-151.
Timberlake, W.
Constructing optimal sequences of behavior: Backwards is beautiful, but . . .
BBS 1988 11 (1): 151-152.
Westerterp, K.
Optimization of energy gain: Theory and practice.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 152-153.
Yoerg, S.I.
Skepticism about dynamic modeling: General problems and the special problems of
learning.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 153-154.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
There’s no such thing as a free lunch.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 154-159.
CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Zuriff, G.E.
Précis of Behaviorism: A conceptual
reconstruction.
BBS 1986
9: 687-724.
Lachman, R.
Behaviorism: Counterarguments are pointless.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 165-166.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Zuriff, G.E.
A counterargument, nevertheless.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 166-167.
CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Gualtieri, T., Hicks, R.E.
An immunoreactive theory
of selective male affliction.
BBS
1985 8: 427-441.
Berglin, C.-G.
Statements on male antigenicity based on faulty statistical analysis.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 167.
James, W.H.
A further note on the alleged antecedent brother effect in sex ratio.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 168.
Volume 11 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLE
Benbow, C.P.
Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented
preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 169-183.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Becker, B.J., Hedges, L.V.
The effects of selection and variability in studies of gender differences.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 183-184.
Bleier, R.
The plasticity of the human brain and potential.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 184-185.
Bloom, L.
Boys and girls and mathematics: What is the difference?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 185.
Braine, L.G.
Sex differences in mathematics: Is there any news here?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 185-186.
Bryden, M.P.
Cerebral organization and mathematical ability.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 186-187.
Spatial visualization and mathematical reasoning abilities.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 187-188.
Chipman, S.F.
Sex differences in parallax view?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 188.
Denenberg, V.H., Berrebi, A.S., Fitch, R.H.
Sex, brain, and learning differences in rats.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 188-189.
Eysenck, H.J.
O Tempora, O Mores!
BBS 1988 11 (2): 189-190.
Farmer, H.S.
Predicting who our future scientists and mathematicians will be.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 190-191.
Goldman-Rakic, P.S.,
The new math: Is XY ≥ XX?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 191.
Halpern, D.F.
Sex-differences in mathematical reasoning ability: Let me count the ways.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 191-192.
Hardyck, C.
Causes of mathematical giftedness: Beware of left-handed compliments.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 192-193.
Harshman, R.A.
A variety of brains?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 193-194.
Hines, M.
Hormonal influences on human cognition: What they might tell us about
encouraging mathematical abilities in boys and girls.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 194-195.
Humphreys, L.G.
Sex differences in variability may be more important than sex differences in
means.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 195-196.
Hunt, E.
Sex differences in mathematical talents remain unexplained.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 196-197.
Jackson, N.E.
To understand sex-differences we must understand reasoning processes (and vice
versa).
BBS 1988 11 (2): 197-198.
Jensen, A.R.
Sex differences in arithmetic computation and reasoning in prepubertal boys and
girls.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 198-199.
Kenrick, D.I.
Biology: Si!: Hard-wired ability: Maybe no.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 199-200.
Kimura, D.
Biological influences on cognitive function.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 200.
Kornbrot, D.E.
Creative mathematics: Do SAT-M sex effects matter?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 200-201.
Mackenzie, B.
Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: Causes, consequences, and
variability.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 201-202.
Mayer, R.E.
What we really need is a theory of mathematical ability.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 202-203.
McGuinness, D.
Socialization versus biology: Time to move on.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 203-204.
Mills, C.J.
Rival hypotheses: Problems and possibilities.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 204-205.
Money, J.
Mathematics as male pathology.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 205-206.
Newcombe, N., Baenninger, M.
Nature/nuture in male/female mathematical giftedness.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 206.
Nyborg, H.
Mathematics, sex hormones, and brain functions.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 206-207.
Rosenthal, R.
Evaluating explanations of sex differences in mathematical reasoning scores.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 207-208.
Sanders, B.
Mathematical ability, spatial ability, and remedial training.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 208-209.
Searleman, A.
Neuropsychological factors and mathematical reasoning ability.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 209-210.
Smothergill, D.W.
Causes of things and nature of things: Advice from Hughlings Jackson.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 210.
Sternberg, R.J.
The male/female difference is there: Should we care?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 210-211.
Swanson, H.H.
Hormones and sexual differentiation.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 211-212.
Symons, D.
On throwing bones to environmentalists.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 212.
Tiger, L.
Sex differences in mathematics: Why the fuss?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 212.
Vandenberg, S.G.
Could these sex differences be due to genes?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 212-214.
Wahlsten, D.
Bias and sampling error in sex difference research.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 214.
Walberg, H.J.
Factors influencing educational productivity.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 214-215.
Witelson, S.F.
Neuroanatomical sex differences: Of no consequence for cognition?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 215-217.
Zohar, A., Guttman, R.
The forgotten realm of genetic differences.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 217.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Benbow, C.P.
Sex-related differences in precocious mathematical reasoning ability: Not
illusory, not easily explained.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 217-225.
TARGET ARTICLE
Whiten, A., Byrne, R.W.
Tactical deception in primates.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 233-244.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
BBS 1988 11 (2): 244-245.
Baldwin, J.D.
Learning how to deceive.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 245-246.
Bennett, J.
Thoughts about thoughts.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 246-247.
Bernstein, I.S.
Metaphor, cognitive belief and science.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 247-248.
Burghardt, G.M.
Anecdotes and critical anthropomorphism.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 248-249.
Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S.
Classification of deceptive behavior according to levels of cognitive complexity.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 249-251.
Danto, A.C.
Deception and explanatory economy.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 252-253.
Dennett, D.
Why creative intelligence is hard to find.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 253.
de Waal, F.B.M.
Emotional control.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 254.
How to break moulds.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 254-255.
Toward a taxonomy of mind in primates.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 255-256.
Subjective reality.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 256.
Heyes, C.
The distant blast of Lloyd Morgan’s canon.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 256-257.
Humphrey, N.
Lies, damned lies and anecdotal evidence.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 257-258.
McGrew, W.C.
You can’t hide your lying eyes (or can you?).
BBS 1988 11 (2): 258.
Menzel, E.W. Jr.
Mindless behaviorism, bodiless cognitivism or primatology?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 258-259.
Mitchell, R.W.
Ontogeny, biography, and evidence for tactical deception.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 259-260.
Quiatt, D.
Which are more easily deceived, friends or strangers?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 260-261.
Rachlin, H.
Only external representations are needed.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 261-262.
Reynolds, V.
Tactical deception: A likely kind of primate action.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 262.
Deception: A need for theory and ethology.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 262-263.
Shultz, T.R., LaFrenière, P.J.
Deception and adaptation: Multidisciplinary perspectives on presenting a
neutral image.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 263-264.
Smith, P.K.
Family life and opportunities for deception.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 264.
Strum, S.C.
Social strategies and primate psychology.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 264-265.
Thomas, R.K.
Misdescription and misuse of anecdotes and mental state concepts.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 265-266.
Deception and descriptive mentalism.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 266.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Byrne, R.W., Whiten, A.
Towards the next generation in data quality: A new survey of primate tactical
deception.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 267-271.
TARGET ARTICLE
Laming, D.
Précis of Sensory Analysis.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 275-296.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Cavonius, C.R., van der Tweel, L.H.
Limitations in the usefulness of Sensory
Analysis.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 296-297.
Hanna, T.E.
A perspective from auditory psychophysics on differential coupling.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 297-298.
To honor psychophysics and repeal confusion.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 298.
Järvilehto, M.
Obscure input for the sensory analysis: Peripheral information processing is a
dynamic entity.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 298-299.
Kranda, K.
Searching for models.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 299-300.
Kulikowski, J.J.
Sensory analysis of vision.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 300-301.
Legge, G.E., Viemeister, N.F.
Sensory analysis in vision and audition.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 301-302.
Lockhead, G.R.
Modeling temporal and spatial differences.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 302-303.
Macmillan, N.A.
How sensory an Analysis?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 303-304.
Malone, J.C.
Sensory analysis: Phenomena, models, and theories concerning life near
threshold.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 304-305.
Meyer, G.E.
Emerging perceptions of Sensory Analysis.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 305-306.
Questioning some basic assumptions on the form of psychometric functions,
differential coupling, and the amplitude-discrimination of pure tones.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 306-307.
Nevin, J.A.
Sensory analysis and behavior theory.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 307.
Pastore, R.E.
Problems in modeling intensity discrimination for audition.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 307-308.
Pöppel, E., Logothetis, N.
Psychophysical correlates of physiological functions.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 308-309.
Raab, D.H.
What Miller hath joined, Laming hath put asunder.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 309-310.
Stevens, K.A.
Differential coupling for detection versus discrimination.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 310-311.
Tomko, D.L.
Sensory Analysis: The question of
balance.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 311.
A differentiated view of Weber’s law.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 311-312.
Wagner, M.
Presupposing Weber’s Law: Theory without independent confirmation is circular.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 312-313.
Watt, R.J.
What is Weber’s law?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 313-314.
Wenderoth, P.
Critical assumptions in psychophysical analysis.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 314-315.
Yost, W.A.
Sensory analysis: A psychoacoustic
view.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 315-316.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Laming, D.
A reexamination of Sensory Analysis.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 316-336.
Volume 11 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLES
Verleger, R.
Event-related potentials and memory: A critique of the context
updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 343-356.
Donchin, E., Coles, M.G.H.
Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 357-374.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Aleksandrov, I.O., Maksimova, N.E.
P300 and the validity of psychophysiological descriptions of behavior.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 374-375.
Birbaumer, N., Elbert, T.
P3: Byproduct of a byproduct.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 375-377.
Brandeis, D., Callaway, E.
While on the subject of closure . . .
BBS 1988 11 (3): 377.
Chapman, R.M.
Dual thrust in interpreting P3 and memory.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 377-379.
Deecke, L., Lang,
P300
BBS 1988 11 (3): 379-381.
Donald, M.W.
Updating the context of ERP research.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 381-382.
Friedman, D.
ERPs and memory: P300 as well as other components are functionally implicated.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 382-383.
Halgren, E.
The P3: A view from the brain.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 383-385.
Hampson, R.E.,
Reflections on closure and context with a note on hippocampus.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 385-386.
Jones, G.V.
Event-related potentials and memory retrieval.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 386-387.
Jones, M.R.
What does expectancy mean?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 387-388.
Kok, A.
Probability mismatch and template mismatch: A paradox in P300 amplitude?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 388-389.
Markowitsch, H.J.
Problems with brain origins.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 389-390.
Rabbitt, P.
Has the P300 been cost effective?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 390-392.
Rösler, F.
The P300 event-related potentials: A one-humped dromedary’s ssaddle on a
two-humped camel.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 392-393.
Roth, W.T., Ford, J.M.
P3 and (de)activation.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 393-394.
Rugg, M.D.
Event-related potentials and psychological explanation.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 394-395.
Sanders, A.F., Collet, W.
Neither context updating nor context closure corresponds closely
to human performance concepts.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 395-396.
Scholz, R.W.
Variants of expectancy and subjective probability in p300 research.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 396-397.
Verbaten, mn
Novelty and the P3
BBS 1988 11 (3): 397-399
AUTHORS’ RESPONSES
Verleger, R.
From epistemology to P3-ology.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 399-408.
Donchin, E., Coles, M.G.H.
On the conceptual foundations of cognitive psychophysiology.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 408-427.
TARGET ARTICLE
Gardner, R.A., Gardner, B.T.
Feedforward versus feedbackward: An ethological alternative to
the law of effect.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 429-447.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Andrew, R.J.
Contiguity, contingency, and causation.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 447.
Baum, W.M.
Selection by consequences is a good idea.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 447-448.
Bechtel, W., Abrahamsen, A.
Learning, reward, and cognitive differences.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 448-449.
Bolles, R.C.
The bathwater and everything.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 449-450.
Why contingencies won’t go away.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 450-451.
Church, R.M.
Yoked control designs for assessment of contingency.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 451-452.
Exorcizing Watson’s ghost.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 452-453.
Dinsmoor, J.A.
The yoked control design is not the only test for reinforcement.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 453-454.
Dyer, A.B.
The neglected developmental dimension of “obligatory” behavior.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 454-455.
Fantino, E.
Guthrie revisited: For better and worse.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 455.
Graham, G.
Truth about consequences.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 455-456.
Hineline, P.N.
Feeding, forward and backward: Mostly red herrings.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 456-457.
Iversen, J.H.
How to change behavior?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 457-458.
Misrepresenting the law of effect and ethology as its alternative.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 458-459.
Lea, S.E.G., Midgley, M.
Learning as a constraint on obligatory responding.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 459.
Lieberman, P.
Language, evolution, and learning.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 459-460.
Marken, R.S.
The ethology of purpose.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 460-461.
Nelson, K.
Chimp communication without conditioning.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 461-462.
Odling-Smee, F.J., Plotkin, H.C.
Gardners teach Washoe: Feedforward? Washoe teaches
BBS 1988 11 (3): 462-463.
Reid, R.L.
Where are the limits to operant psychology?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 463-464.
Russell, W.M.S.
Ethology, conditioning and learning.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 464-465.
Sevenster, P.
Arbitrary effect of consequences yet indispensable?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 465.
Shettleworth, S.J.
Constraints on learning or laws of performance?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 465-466.
Skinner, B.F.
Signs and countersigns.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 466-467.
Staddon, J.E.R.
On the process of reinforcement.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 467-469.
Stewart, J., Rochford, J.
Behavior change without a theory of learning?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 469-470.
Thomas, D.R.
The law of effect: Contingency or contiguity.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 470-471.
Thompson, C.R.
The law of obligation is insufficient.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 471-472.
Timberlake,
Feedforward
of appetitive structure.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 472-474.
Toates, F.
Feedforward and (not versus)
feedbackward.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 474-475.
Tomasello, M., Snow, C.E.
Well-fed organisms still need feedback.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 475-476.
Tomie, A.
Contingency: Effects of symmetry of choice responses.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 476-477.
Wasserman, E.A.
Response bias in the yoked control procedure.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 477-478.
Whitehurst, G.J., Fischel, J.E.
Feedback in the acquisition of language and other complex behavior.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 478-479.
Editorial Commentary
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Gardner, R.A.,
Truth or consequences.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 479-487.
TARGET ARTICLE
Précis of The Intentional Stance.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 495-505.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Amundson, R.
Logical adaptationism.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 505-506.
Cheney, D., Seyfarth, R.
Another “Just So” story: How the leopard-guarders spot.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 506-507.
Churchland, P.M.
The ontological status of intentional states: Nailing folk psychology to its
perch.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 507-508.
Cussins, A.
Dennett’s realisation theory of the relation between folk and scientific
psychology.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 508-509.
Danto, A.C.
The notional world of D.C. Dennett.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 509-511.
Dretske, F.
The stance stance.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 511-512.
Dummett, M.
Dennett on belief.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 512-514.
Goldman, A.I.
Derived intentionality?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 514.
Real intentions?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 514-515.
Harman, G.
What is the intentional stance?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 515.
Kirsh, D.
Competence models are causal.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 515-517.
Kitcher, P., Kitcher, P.
The devil, the details, and Dr. Dennett.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 517-518.
Lycan, W.G.
Dennett’s instrumentalism.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 518-519.
MacLennan, B.J.
Causes and intentions.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 519-520.
Newell, A.
The intentional stance and the knowledge level.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 520-522.
Premack, D.
Intentionality: How to tell Mae West from a crocodile.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 522-525.
Roitblat, H.L.
How to build a mind.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 525-526.
Will the argument for abstracta
please stand up?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 526-527.
Searle, J.R.
The realistic stance.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 527-529.
Sloman, A.
Why philosophers should be designers.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 529-530.
Smith, M.P.
Styles of computational representation.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 530-531.
Stich, S.P.
Connectionism, Realism and realism.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 531-532.
Taylor, C.
What really matters.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 532-533.
Van Kleeck, M.H.
Intentional system theory and experimental psychology.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 533-534.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Science, philosophy, and interpretation.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 535-546.
CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Ebbesson, S.O.E.
Evolution and ontogeny of
neural circuits.
BBS 1984
7: 321-66.
Johnson, M.
Parcellation and plasticity: implications for ontogeny.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 547-548.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Ebbesson, S.O.E.
Ontogenetic parcellation: Dual processes.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 548-549.
CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Hobson, J.A., Lydic, R., Baghdoyan, H.A.
Evolving concepts of sleep
cycle generation: From brain centers to neuronal populations.
BBS 1986
9: 371-448.
Corner, M.A.
Finally, all that remained was the smile: the reciprocal interaction theory of
sleep rhythmicity—truly expanding or just fading away?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 549-550.
Morgane, P.J.
Extended cholinergic sleep systems: Not so new—they do go back to 1962, 1963!
BBS 1988 11 (3): 550-552.
CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Foreman, N., Stevens, R.
Relationships between the
superior colliculus and hippocampus: Neural and behavioral considerations.
BBS 1987
10:101-51.
Thinus-Blanc, C.
Exploration and memory.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 552-554.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Foreman, N., Stevens, R.
Memory—we had not forgotten.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 554-557.
CONTINUING COMMENTARY on
How brains make chaos in
order to make sense of the world.
BBS 1987
10: 161-95.
Stowell, H.
How brains might work?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 558.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Skarda,
Research options and the “creativity” of chaos.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 558-559.
Freeman, W.J.
Too early for time and consciousness.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 559.
Volume 11 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLE
Davis, H., Pérusse, R.
Numerical competence in animals: Definitional issues, current evidence and a
new research agenda.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 561-579.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Boysen, S.T.
Kanting processes in the chimpanzee: What (and who) really counts?
BBS 1988 11 (4): 580.
Braaten, R.F.
Protocounting as a last resort.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 581.
Burns, R.A.
Subitizing and rhythm in serial numerical investigations with animals.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 581-582.
Capaldi, E.J., Miller, D.J.
A different view of numerical processes in animals.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 582-583.
Chauvin, B.
Human infants are perhaps not so much gifted after all.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 583.
Fuson, K.C.
Some further clarifications of numerical terminology using results from young children.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 583-585.
Gallistel, C.R.
Counting vs subitizing vs the sense of number.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 585-586.
Gellatly, A.R.H.
Counting as a social practice.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 586-587.
Honig, W.K.
The magical number four, plus or minus one: Working memory for numbers of items.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 587-588.
Idrobo, F., Mostofsky, D.I.
Definitional constraints and experimental realities.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 588.
Johnson, M.
Out for the count.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 589.
Karmiloff-Smith, A.
Human versus non-human abilities: Is there a difference which really counts?
BBS 1988 11 (4): 589-590.
King, J.E.
Number concepts in animals: A multidimensional array.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 590.
Lechelt, E.C.
Number reckoning strategies: A basis for distinction.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 590-591.
Luchins, A.S., Luchins, E.H.
Numbers and counting: Intuitionistic and gestalt psychological
viewpoints.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 591-592.
Macphail, E.M.
You can’t succeed without really counting.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 592-593.
Mcgonigle, B.
Is it the thought that counts?
BBS 1988 11 (4): 593-594.
Nevin, J.A.
Reinforcement schedules and “numerical competence.”
BBS 1988 11 (4): 594-595.
Pepperberg, I.M.
Studying numerical competence: A trip through linguistic wonderland?
BBS 1988 11 (4): 595-596.
Schusterman, R.J.
Language and counting in animals: Stimulus classes and equivalence relations.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 596-597.
Seibt, U.
Are animals naturally attuned to number?
BBS 1988 11 (4): 597-598.
Steffe, L.P.
Possibilities for the construction of a sense of number by animals.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 598-599.
Suppes, P.
Problems of axiomatics and complexity in studying numerical competence in
animals.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 599.
Thomas, R.K.
To honor Davis and Pérusse and repeal their glossary of processes of numerical
competence.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 600.
von Glasersfeld, E.
Difficulties of demonstrating possession of concepts.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 601-602.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Davis, H., Pérusse, R.
Numerical competence: From backwater to mainstream of comparative psychology.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 602-611.
TARGET ARTICLE
Developmental explanation and the ontogeny of birdsong: Nature/nurture redux.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 617-629.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Alcock, J.
Singing down a blind alley.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 630-631.
Bekoff, M.
Birdsong and the “problem” of nature and nurture: Endless chirping about
inadequate evidence or merely singing the blues about inevitable biases in, and
limitations of, human inference?
BBS 1988 11 (4): 631.
Burghardt, G.M.
Developmental creationism.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 632.
Dehaene, S., Changeux, J.-P.
Selectionist mechanisms: A framework for interactionism.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 633.
Gollin, E.S.
Nature/nurture and other dichotomies.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 633-634.
Güttinger, H.-R.
“Template theory” is heuristic in disentangling organism-environment
interactions.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 634-635.
Hirsch, J.
Behavior-genetic analysis versus ontogenetic imperialism.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 635-636.
Hood, K.E.
Selective breeding-selective rearing interactions and the ontogeny of
aggressive behavior.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 636.
Jensen, D.D.
The polythetic perspective.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 637.
Khayutin, S.N., Alexandrov, L.I.
Ab ovo with song?
BBS 1988 11 (4): 637-638.
King, A.P., West, M.J.
Ducks don’t sing.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 638-639.
Konopka, R.
When is developmental biology not developmental biology.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 639.
Kroodsma, D.E.
No pain, no gain?
BBS 1988 11 (4): 639-640.
Kruijt, J.P., Tencate, C.
Song development and sexual imprinting: Toward an interactionist approach.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 640.
Lemon, R.E.
Bird song development: Real or imagined results?
BBS 1988 11 (4): 640-641.
Miller, D.B.
Beyond interactionism: A transactional approach to behavioral development.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 641-642.
Morton, E.S.
“Innate”: Outdated and inadequate or linguistic convenience?
BBS 1988 11 (4): 642-643.
Mundinger, P.C.
Conceptual errors, different perspectives, and genetic analysis
of song ontogeny.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 643-644.
Oyama, S.
How do you transmit a template?
BBS 1988 11 (4): 644-645.
Pepperberg, I.M.
Nature/nurture reflux.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 645-646.
Schull, J.
In defense of innateness, and of its critics.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 646-647.
Searcy, W.A.
Song development from evolutionary and ecological perspectives.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 647-648.
Slater, P.J.B.
The nature and nurture of bird song.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 648-649.
Steklis, H.D.
The nature nurture debate: Same old wolf in new sheep’s clothing?
BBS 1988 11 (4): 649-650.
Thelen, E.
Interactionism is good, but not good enough.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 650.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Challenges to an interactionist approach to the study of song development.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 651-657.
TARGET ARTICLE
Logue, A.W.
Research on self-control: An integrating framework.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 665-678.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Ainslie, G.
Research on self-control – An integrating framework.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 679-680.
Caraco, T.
On the careful use of ecological models.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 680-681.
Carver, C.S.
On goals, perceptions, and self-control.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 681-682.
Eisenberger, R.
Perception and learning in self-control.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 682-683.
Fantino, E.,
Foraging for integration.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 683-684.
Green, L., Fisher, E.B. Jr.
Self-control in context.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 684-685.
Hinson, J.M.
The conflicting psychologies of self-control: A way out?
BBS 1988 11 (4): 685-686.
In delay there lies no plenty.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 686-687.
Imada, S., Imada, H.
Self-restraint: A type of self-control in an approach-avoidance situation.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 687-688.
Kuhl, J.
Functional-characteristics of human self-control.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 688.
Lowe, C.F., Horne, P.J.
On the origins of selves and self-control.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 689-690.
Mazur, J.E., Herrnstein, R.J.
On the functions relating delay, reinforcer value, and behavior.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 690-691.
Moore, J.
Evolution and impulsiveness.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 691.
Navarick, D.J.
Spurious self-control: Potential outcome in research with humans.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 691-692.
Pomerleau, O.F., Pomerleau, C.S.
On observing the unobservable.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 692.
Shimoff, E.,
Self-control and the panda’s thumb.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 693.
Barke, E.J.S.S.
Misinterpreting Mischel.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 693-694.
Timberlake, W.
Evolution, behavior systems, and “self-control”: The fit between
organism and test environment.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 694-695.
Yamamura, N.
Models are not on the same level: Empirical law and hypothesis.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 695-696.
Zeiler, M.D.
Evolution is not rational banking.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 696-697.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Logue, A.W.
Working toward the big reinforcer: Integration.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 697-704.
CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Holender, D.
Semantic activation
without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and
visual masking: A survey and appraisal.
BBS 1986 9: 1-66.
Doyle, J.R.
High-level factors alter signal detectability.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 711.
CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Spanos, N.P.
Hypnotic behavior: A social-psychological
interpretation of amnesia, analgesia, and “trance logic.”
BBS 1986 9: 449-502.
Michaux, D.M.J.
Toward a new paradigm of hypnosis: A model combining the social psychological
and special-processes paradigms.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 712-714.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Spanos, N.P.
Misconceptions about influenceability research and about sociocognitive
approaches to hypnosis.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 714-716.
CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Berkinblit, M.B., Feldman, A.G., Fukson, O.I.
Adaptability of innate
motor patterns and motor control mechanisms
BBS 1986 9: 585-638.
Goldberg, G.,
Motor control as adaptational biology: Relevance to education and
rehabilitation.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 717-719.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Berkinblit, M.B., Feldman, A.G., Fukson, O.I.
The organization and optimization of movement.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 719-720.
CONTINUING COMMENTARY on MacNeilage, P.F., Studdert-Kennedy, M.G.,
Lindblom, B.
Primate handedness
reconsidered
BBS 1987 10: 247-303.
Denenberg, V.H.
Handedness hangups and species snobbery.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 721-722.
Fragaszy, D.M., Adams-Curtis, L.E.
What next for handedness research?
BBS 1988 11 (4): 722-723.
Hamilton, C.R., Vermeire, B.A.
Cognition, not handedness, is lateralized in monkeys.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 723-725.
Hardyck, C.
Giving the primates a hand: Is the applause really justified?
BBS 1988 11 (4): 725-726.
Harris, L.J., Carlson, D.F.
Hand preference for visually guided reaching in human infants and adults.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 726-727.
Kuhl, P.K.
On handedness in primates and human infants.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 727-729.
Peters, M.
The primate mouth as agent of manipulation and its relation to human handedness.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 729.
Satz, P.
Primate handedness: A paradoxical link to humans?
BBS 1988 11 (4): 729-731.
Walker, S.
Language, handedness and the larynx.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 731-732.
Ward, J.P.
Left-hand reaching preferences in prosimians.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 732-733.
Many hands make light work: Integrating research on primate handedness.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 733-735.
Witelson, S.F.
Hand preference: basis or reflection of hemisphere specialization.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 735-736.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
MacNeilage, P.F., Studdert-Kennedy, M.G., Lindblom, B.
Primate handedness: A foot in the door.
BBS 1988 11 (4): 736-744.