Volume 11 – Issue 01 – March 1988

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Smolensky, P.
On the proper treatment of connectionism.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 1-23.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Antony, L., Levine, J.
On the proper treatment of the connection between connectionism
and symbolism.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 23.

 

Bechtel, W.
Connectionism and interlevel relations.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 23-25.

 

Belew, R.K.
Two constructive themes.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 25-26.

 

Chandrasekaran, B., Goel, A., Allemang, D.
Information processing abstractions: The message still counts more than the medium.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 26-27.

 

Cleland, C.E.
Is Smolensky’s treatment of connectionism on the level?
BBS 1988 11 (1): 27-28.

 

Dellarosa, D.
The psychological appeal of connectionism.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 28.

 

Dietrich, E., Fields, C.
Some assumptions underlying Smolensky’s treatment of connectionism.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 29-31.

 

Dreyfus, H.L., Dreyfus, S.E.
On the proper treatment of Smolensky.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 31-32.

 

Dyer, M.G.
The promise and problems of connectionism.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 32.

 

Freeman, W.J.
Dynamic systems and the “subsymbolic level.”
BBS 1988 11 (1): 33-34.

 

Freidin, R.
Connectionism and the study of language.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 34-35.

 

Golden, R.M.
Statistical rationality.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 35.

 

Hofstadter, D.R.
Common-sense and conceptual halos.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 35-37.

 

Hunter, L.E.
Some memory, but no mind.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 37-38.

 

Hanson, S.J.
On the obvious treatment of connectionism.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 38-39.

 

Lakoff, G.
Smolensky, semantics, and the sensorimotor system.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 39-40.

 

Lehnert, W.G.
Physics, cognition, and connectionism: An interdisciplinary alchemy.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 40-41.

 

Lindsay, R.K.
Can this treatment raise the dead?
BBS 1988 11 (1): 41-42.

 

Lloyd, D.
Connectionism in the golden age of cognitive science.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 42-43.

 

Lycan, W.G.
Symbols, subsymbols, neurons.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 43-44.

 

McCarthy, J.
Epistemological challenges for connectionism.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 44.

 

Mortenson, C.
In defense of neurons.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 44-45.

 

Nelson, R.J.
Connections among connections.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 45-46.

 

Prince, A., Pinker, S.
Subsymbols arent much good outside of a symbol-processing architecture.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 46-47.

 

Quarton, G.C.
A two-dimensional array of models of cognitive function.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 48.

 

Rey, G.
Sanity surrounded by madness.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 48-50.

 

Rueckl, J.G.
Making the connections.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 50-51.

 

Schneider, W.
Structure and controlling subsymbolic processing.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 51-52.

 

Shepard, R.N.
How fully should connectionism be activated: Two sources of excitation and one of inhibition.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 52.

 

Stich, S.P.
From connectionism to eliminativism.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 53-54.

 

Stone, G.O.
From data to dynamics: The use of multiple levels of analysis.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 54-55.

 

Touretzky, D.S.
On the proper treatment of thermostats.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 55-56.

 

den Uyl, M.J.
The essential opacity of modular systems: Why even connectionism cannot give complete formal accounts of cognition.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 56-57.

 

Van Gulick, R.
Has the case been made against the ecumenical view of connectionism?
BBS 1988 11 (1): 57-58.

 

Woodfield, A., Morton, A.
The reality of the symbolic and subsymbolic systems.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 58.

 

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

 

Smolensky, P.
Putting together connectionism – again.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 59-70.

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Glezer, I.I., Jacobs, M.S., Morgane, P.J.
Implications of the “initial brain” concept for brain evolution in Cetacea.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 75-89.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Aronson, L.R., Tobach, E.
Conservative aspects of the dolphin cortex match its behavioral
level.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 89-90.

 

Campbell, C.B.G.
Primitive survivors and neocortical evolution.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 90-91.

 

Carlson, M.
Evolution of the brain in Cetacea – is bigger better?
BBS 1988 11 (1): 91-92.

 

Eisenberg, J.F.
Cetacean brains have a structure similar to the brains of primitive mammals; does this imply limits in function?
BBS 1988 11 (1): 92.

 

Falk, D.
Allometry cannot be ignored in brain evolution studies.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 92-93.

 

Gibson, K.R.
Fish, sea snakes, dolphins, teeth and brains some evolutionary paradoxes.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 93-94.

 

Innocenti, G.M.
Developmental axes and evolutionary trees.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 94-95.

 

Irsigler, F.J.
Morphogenetic versus morphofunctional theory.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 95-96.

 

Johnson, J.I.
Whose brain is inital-like?
BBS 1988 11 (1): 96.

 

Kaas, J.H.
Determining species differences in numbers of cortical areas and modules: The architectonic methods needs supplementation.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 96-97.

 

Neafsey, E.J.
The concept of association cortex should be abandoned.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 97.

 

Parker, S.T.
Putting all cetacean brains in one category is a big order.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 97-98.

 

Reep, R.L.
The “initial brain”: Initial considerations.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 98-99.

 

Rensch, B.
What about Sirena?
BBS 1988 11 (1): 99.

 

Ridgway, S.H., Wood, F.G.
Cetacean brain evolution.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 99-100.

 

Shoshani, J.
Elephants have a large neocortex too.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 100-101.

 

Stein, B.E.
Concepts of brain evolution.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 100-102.

 

Steklis, H.D.
Climbing the evolutionary ladder of success: The scala naturae
in models of brain evolution.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 101-102.

 

Szentágothai, J.
Elegant hypothesis are intellectually rewarding; even more so if more hard data were available.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 102.

 

Valverde, F.
Competition for the sake of diversity.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 102-103.

 

Wilczynski, W.
Evolutionary events and the “modification/multiplication” relationship.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 103-104.

 

Wind, J.
Brain evolution: Some problems of interpretation.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 104-105.

 

Zilles, K., Rehkämper, G.
The initial brain concept: A work in progress.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 105-106.

 

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

 

Glezer, I.I., Jacobs, M.S., Morgane, P.J.
The initial brain concept: Its uses and misuses.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 106-111.

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Houston, A.I., McNamara, J.M.
A framework for the functional analysis of behavior.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 117-130.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Alexander, R.McN.
The risks of the cause.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 130.

 

Barnard, C.J.
Policy-making for survival: Reading the rules and small print.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 130-131.

 

Calder, W.A.
State
, function, and optimization.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 131-133.

 

Caraco, T.
Fitness, currencies, and models.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 133.

 

Clark, C.W.
Applications and limitations of dynamic programming in behavioral-theory.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 134.

 

Dawkins, M.S.
Motivation, decision-making, and choice.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 134-135.

 

Fantino, E.
Conditioned reinforcement and reproductive success.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 135.

 

Heiner, R.A.
Adapting canonical costs and robust rules for imperfect decisions.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 135-136.

 

Heyman, G.M.
Optimization theory: A too narrow path.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 136-137.

 

Huntingford, F.A., Metcalfe, N.B.
The functional analysis of behavior: Making room for Prufrock.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 137-138.

 

King, G.R., Logue, A.W.
Norms of behavior: balancing generality with testability.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 138-139.

 

Mangel, M.
Dynamic theories of behavior.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 139-141.

 

Morse, D.H.
Behavior and fitness.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 141.

 

Navarick, D.J.
Is there a preference for variability?
BBS 1988 11 (1): 141-142.

 

Partridge, L.D.
Evolution of a controller of state!
BBS 1988 11 (1): 142-143.

 

Powers, W.T.A.
A nonfunctional analysis of behavior.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 143-144.

 

Rachlin, H.
Biological relevance.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 144.

 

Reid, A.K.
Realistic versus minimal models.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 144-145.

 

Scudo, F.M.
Behavior, adaptedness, and Darwinian theories.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 145-146.

 

Staw, R.E., Carolan, T.F.
Adjoint optimal control.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 146-147.

 

Sherry, D.F.
Dynamic-programming: From eternity to here.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 147-148.

 

Sih, A.
On analyzing complex relationships between behavior, state and fitness.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 148-149.

 

Smith, E.A.
Realism, generality, or testability: The ecological modeler’s dilemma.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 149-150.

 

Stenseth, N.C.
Houston & McNamara are right, but are they helpful to empiricists?
BBS 1988 11 (1): 150-151.

 

Timberlake, W.
Constructing optimal sequences of behavior: Backwards is beautiful, but . . .
BBS 1988 11 (1): 151-152.

 

Westerterp, K.
Optimization of energy gain: Theory and practice.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 152-153.

 

Yoerg, S.I.
Skepticism about dynamic modeling: General problems and the special problems of learning.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 153-154.

 

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

 

Houston, A.I., McNamara, J.M.
There’s no such thing as a free lunch.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 154-159.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Zuriff, G.E.

Précis of Behaviorism: A conceptual reconstruction.

BBS 1986 9: 687-724.

 

Lachman, R.
Behaviorism: Counterarguments are pointless.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 165-166.

 

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

 

Zuriff, G.E.
A counterargument, nevertheless.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 166-167.

 

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Gualtieri, T., Hicks, R.E.

An immunoreactive theory of selective male affliction.

BBS 1985 8: 427-441.

 

Berglin, C.-G.
Statements on male antigenicity based on faulty statistical analysis.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 167.

 

James, W.H.
A further note on the alleged antecedent brother effect in sex ratio.
BBS 1988 11 (1): 168.

 

Volume 11 – Issue 02 – June 1988

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Benbow, C.P.
Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 169-183.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Becker, B.J., Hedges, L.V.
The effects of selection and variability in studies of gender differences.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 183-184.

 

Bleier, R.
The plasticity of the human brain and potential.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 184-185.

 

Bloom, L.
Boys and girls and mathematics: What is the difference?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 185.

 

Braine, L.G.
Sex differences in mathematics: Is there any news here?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 185-186.

 

Bryden, M.P.
Cerebral organization and mathematical ability.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 186-187.

 

Burnett, S.A.
Spatial visualization and mathematical reasoning abilities.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 187-188.

 

Chipman, S.F.
Sex differences in parallax view?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 188.

 

Denenberg, V.H., Berrebi, A.S., Fitch, R.H.
Sex, brain, and learning differences in rats.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 188-189.

 

Eysenck, H.J.
O Tempora, O Mores!
BBS 1988 11 (2): 189-190.

 

Farmer, H.S.
Predicting who our future scientists and mathematicians will be.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 190-191.

 

Goldman-Rakic, P.S., Clark, A.S.
The new math: Is XY ≥ XX?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 191.

 

Halpern, D.F.
Sex-differences in mathematical reasoning ability: Let me count the ways.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 191-192.

 

Hardyck, C.
Causes of mathematical giftedness: Beware of left-handed compliments.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 192-193.

 

Harshman, R.A.
A variety of brains?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 193-194.

 

Hines, M.
Hormonal influences on human cognition: What they might tell us about encouraging mathematical abilities in boys and girls.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 194-195.

 

Humphreys, L.G.
Sex differences in variability may be more important than sex differences in means.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 195-196.

 

Hunt, E.
Sex differences in mathematical talents remain unexplained.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 196-197.

 

Jackson, N.E.
To understand sex-differences we must understand reasoning processes (and vice versa).

BBS 1988 11 (2): 197-198.

 

Jensen, A.R.
Sex differences in arithmetic computation and reasoning in prepubertal boys and girls.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 198-199.

 

Kenrick, D.I.
Biology: Si!: Hard-wired ability: Maybe no.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 199-200.

 

Kimura, D.
Biological influences on cognitive function.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 200.

 

Kornbrot, D.E.
Creative mathematics: Do SAT-M sex effects matter?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 200-201.

 

Mackenzie, B.
Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: Causes, consequences, and variability.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 201-202.

 

Mayer, R.E.
What we really need is a theory of mathematical ability.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 202-203.

 

McGuinness, D.
Socialization versus biology: Time to move on.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 203-204.

 

Mills, C.J.
Rival hypotheses: Problems and possibilities.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 204-205.

 

Money, J.
Mathematics as male pathology.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 205-206.

 

Newcombe, N., Baenninger, M.
Nature/nuture in male/female mathematical giftedness.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 206.

 

Nyborg, H.
Mathematics, sex hormones, and brain functions.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 206-207.

 

Rosenthal, R.
Evaluating explanations of sex differences in mathematical reasoning scores.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 207-208.

 

Sanders, B.
Mathematical ability, spatial ability, and remedial training.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 208-209.

 

Searleman, A.
Neuropsychological factors and mathematical reasoning ability.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 209-210.

 

Smothergill, D.W.
Causes of things and nature of things: Advice from Hughlings Jackson.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 210.

 

Sternberg, R.J.
The male/female difference is there: Should we care?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 210-211.

 

Swanson, H.H.
Hormones and sexual differentiation.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 211-212.

 

Symons, D.
On throwing bones to environmentalists.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 212.

 

Tiger, L.
Sex differences in mathematics: Why the fuss?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 212.

 

Vandenberg, S.G.
Could these sex differences be due to genes?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 212-214.

 

Wahlsten, D.
Bias and sampling error in sex difference research.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 214.

 

Walberg, H.J.
Factors influencing educational productivity.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 214-215.

 

Witelson, S.F.
Neuroanatomical sex differences: Of no consequence for cognition?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 215-217.

 

Zohar, A., Guttman, R.
The forgotten realm of genetic differences.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 217.

 

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

 

Benbow, C.P.
Sex-related differences in precocious mathematical reasoning ability: Not illusory, not easily explained.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 217-225.

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Whiten, A., Byrne, R.W.
Tactical deception in primates.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 233-244.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Altmann, S.A.
Darwin, deceit and metacommunication.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 244-245.

 

Baldwin, J.D.
Learning how to deceive.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 245-246.

 

Bennett, J.
Thoughts about thoughts.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 246-247.

 

Bernstein, I.S.
Metaphor, cognitive belief and science.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 247-248.

 

Burghardt, G.M.
Anecdotes and critical anthropomorphism.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 248-249.

 

Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S.
Classification of deceptive behavior according to levels of cognitive complexity.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 249-251.

 

Danto, A.C.
Deception and explanatory economy.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 252-253.

 

Dennett, D.
Why creative intelligence is hard to find.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 253.

 

de Waal, F.B.M.
Emotional control.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 254.

 

Dunbar, R.I.M.
How to break moulds.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 254-255.

 

Gallup, G.G.
Toward a taxonomy of mind in primates.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 255-256.

 

Griffin, D.R.
Subjective reality.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 256.

 

Heyes, C.
The distant blast of Lloyd Morgan’s canon.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 256-257.

 

Humphrey, N.
Lies, damned lies and anecdotal evidence.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 257-258.

 

McGrew, W.C.
You can’t hide your lying eyes (or can you?).

BBS 1988 11 (2): 258.

 

Menzel, E.W. Jr.
Mindless behaviorism, bodiless cognitivism or primatology?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 258-259.

 

Mitchell, R.W.
Ontogeny, biography, and evidence for tactical deception.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 259-260.

 

Quiatt, D.
Which are more easily deceived, friends or strangers?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 260-261.

 

Rachlin, H.
Only external representations are needed.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 261-262.

 

Reynolds, V.
Tactical deception: A likely kind of primate action.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 262.

 

Ristau, C.A.
Deception: A need for theory and ethology.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 262-263.

 

Shultz, T.R., LaFrenière, P.J.
Deception and adaptation: Multidisciplinary perspectives on presenting a neutral image.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 263-264.

 

Smith, P.K.
Family life and opportunities for deception.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 264.

 

Strum, S.C.
Social strategies and primate psychology.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 264-265.

 

Thomas, R.K.
Misdescription and misuse of anecdotes and mental state concepts.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 265-266.

 

Thompson, N.S.
Deception and descriptive mentalism.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 266.

 

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

 

Byrne, R.W., Whiten, A.
Towards the next generation in data quality: A new survey of primate tactical deception.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 267-271.

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Laming, D.
Précis of Sensory Analysis.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 275-296.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Cavonius, C.R., van der Tweel, L.H.
Limitations in the usefulness of Sensory Analysis.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 296-297.

 

Hanna, T.E.
A perspective from auditory psychophysics on differential coupling.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 297-298.

 

Harvey, L.O. Jr.
To honor psychophysics and repeal confusion.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 298.

 

Järvilehto, M.
Obscure input for the sensory analysis: Peripheral information processing is a dynamic entity.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 298-299.

 

Kranda, K.
Searching for models.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 299-300.

 

Kulikowski, J.J.
Sensory analysis of vision.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 300-301.

 

Legge, G.E., Viemeister, N.F.
Sensory analysis in vision and audition.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 301-302.

 

Lockhead, G.R.
Modeling temporal and spatial differences.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 302-303.

 

Macmillan, N.A.
How sensory an Analysis?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 303-304.

 

Malone, J.C.
Sensory analysis: Phenomena, models, and theories concerning life near threshold.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 304-305.

 

Meyer, G.E.
Emerging perceptions of Sensory Analysis.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 305-306.

 

Moore, B.C.J.
Questioning some basic assumptions on the form of psychometric functions, differential coupling, and the amplitude-discrimination of pure tones.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 306-307.

 

Nevin, J.A.
Sensory analysis and behavior theory.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 307.

 

Pastore, R.E.
Problems in modeling intensity discrimination for audition.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 307-308.

 

Pöppel, E., Logothetis, N.
Psychophysical correlates of physiological functions.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 308-309.

 

Raab, D.H.
What Miller hath joined, Laming hath put asunder.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 309-310.

 

Stevens, K.A.
Differential coupling for detection versus discrimination.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 310-311.

 

Tomko, D.L.
Sensory Analysis: The question of balance.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 311.

 

Tyler, C.W.
A differentiated view of Weber’s law.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 311-312.

 

Wagner, M.
Presupposing Weber’s Law: Theory without independent confirmation is circular.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 312-313.

 

Watt, R.J.
What is Weber’s law?
BBS 1988 11 (2): 313-314.

 

Wenderoth, P.
Critical assumptions in psychophysical analysis.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 314-315.

 

Yost, W.A.
Sensory analysis: A psychoacoustic view.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 315-316.

 

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

 

Laming, D.
A reexamination of Sensory Analysis.
BBS 1988 11 (2): 316-336.

 

Volume 11 – Issue 03 – September 1988

 

TARGET ARTICLES

 

Verleger, R.
Event-related potentials and memory: A critique of the context
updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3.

BBS 1988 11 (3): 343-356.

 

Donchin, E., Coles, M.G.H.
Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 357-374.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Aleksandrov, I.O., Maksimova, N.E.
P300 and the validity of psychophysiological descriptions of behavior.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 374-375.

 

Birbaumer, N., Elbert, T.
P3: Byproduct of a byproduct.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 375-377.

 

Brandeis, D., Callaway, E.
While on the subject of closure . . .
BBS 1988 11 (3): 377.

 

Chapman, R.M.
Dual thrust in interpreting P3 and memory.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 377-379.

 

Deecke, L., Lang, W.
P300
as the resolution of negative cortical DC shifts.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 379-381.

 

Donald, M.W.
Updating the context of ERP research.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 381-382.

 

Friedman, D.
ERPs and memory: P300 as well as other components are functionally implicated.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 382-383.

 

Halgren, E.
The P3: A view from the brain.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 383-385.

 

Hampson, R.E., Deadwyler, S.A.
Reflections on closure and context with a note on hippocampus.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 385-386.

 

Jones, G.V.
Event-related potentials and memory retrieval.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 386-387.

 

Jones, M.R.
What does expectancy mean?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 387-388.

 

Kok, A.
Probability mismatch and template mismatch: A paradox in P300 amplitude?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 388-389.

 

Markowitsch, H.J.
Problems with brain origins.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 389-390.

 

Rabbitt, P.
Has the P300 been cost effective?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 390-392.

 

Rösler, F.
The P300 event-related potentials: A one-humped dromedary’s ssaddle on a two-humped camel.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 392-393.

 

Roth, W.T., Ford, J.M.
P3 and (de)activation.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 393-394.

 

Rugg, M.D.
Event-related potentials and psychological explanation.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 394-395.

 

Sanders, A.F., Collet, W.
Neither context updating nor context closure corresponds closely
to human performance concepts.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 395-396.

 

Scholz, R.W.
Variants of expectancy and subjective probability in p300 research.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 396-397.

 

Verbaten, mn
Novelty and the P3

BBS 1988 11 (3): 397-399

 

AUTHORS’ RESPONSES

 

Verleger, R.
From epistemology to P3-ology.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 399-408.

 

Donchin, E., Coles, M.G.H.
On the conceptual foundations of cognitive psychophysiology.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 408-427.

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Gardner, R.A., Gardner, B.T.
Feedforward versus feedbackward: An ethological alternative to
the law of effect.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 429-447.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Andrew, R.J.
Contiguity, contingency, and causation.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 447.

 

Baum, W.M.
Selection by consequences is a good idea.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 447-448.

 

Bechtel, W., Abrahamsen, A.
Learning, reward, and cognitive differences.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 448-449.

 

Bolles, R.C.
The bathwater and everything.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 449-450.

 

Catania, A.C., Shimoff, E.
Why contingencies won’t go away.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 450-451.

 

Church, R.M.
Yoked control designs for assessment of contingency.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 451-452.

 

Dickinson, A., Mackintosh, N.J.
Exorcizing Watson’s ghost.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 452-453.

 

Dinsmoor, J.A.
The yoked control design is not the only test for reinforcement.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 453-454.

 

Dyer, A.B.
The neglected developmental dimension of “obligatory” behavior.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 454-455.

 

Fantino, E.
Guthrie revisited: For better and worse.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 455.

 

Graham, G.
Truth about consequences.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 455-456.

 

Hineline, P.N.
Feeding, forward and backward: Mostly red herrings.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 456-457.

 

Iversen, J.H.
How to change behavior?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 457-458.

 

Johnston, T.D., Sharp, J.A.
Misrepresenting the law of effect and ethology as its alternative.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 458-459.

 

Lea, S.E.G., Midgley, M.
Learning as a constraint on obligatory responding.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 459.

 

Lieberman, P.
Language, evolution, and learning.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 459-460.

 

Marken, R.S.
The ethology of purpose.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 460-461.

 

Nelson, K.
Chimp communication without conditioning.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 461-462.

 

Odling-Smee, F.J., Plotkin, H.C.
Gardners teach Washoe: Feedforward? Washoe teaches
Gardners: Feedback?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 462-463.

 

Reid, R.L.
Where are the limits to operant psychology?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 463-464.

 

Russell, W.M.S.
Ethology, conditioning and learning.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 464-465.

 

Sevenster, P.
Arbitrary effect of consequences yet indispensable?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 465.

 

Shettleworth, S.J.
Constraints on learning or laws of performance?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 465-466.

 

Skinner, B.F.
Signs and countersigns.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 466-467.

 

Staddon, J.E.R.
On the process of reinforcement.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 467-469.

 

Stewart, J., Rochford, J.
Behavior change without a theory of learning?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 469-470.

 

Thomas, D.R.
The law of effect: Contingency or contiguity.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 470-471.

 

Thompson, C.R.
The law of obligation is insufficient.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 471-472.

 

Timberlake, W.
Feedforward
and feedback processes in learning: The importance
of appetitive structure.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 472-474.

 

Toates, F.
Feedforward and (not versus) feedbackward.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 474-475.

 

Tomasello, M., Snow, C.E.
Well-fed organisms still need feedback.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 475-476.

 

Tomie, A.
Contingency: Effects of symmetry of choice responses.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 476-477.

 

Wasserman, E.A.
Response bias in the yoked control procedure.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 477-478.

 

Whitehurst, G.J., Fischel, J.E.
Feedback in the acquisition of language and other complex behavior.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 478-479.

 

Editorial Commentary

 

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

 

Gardner, R.A., Gardner, B.T.
Truth or consequences.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 479-487.

 

TARGET ARTICLE

 

Dennett, D.C.
Précis of The Intentional Stance.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 495-505.

 

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

 

Amundson, R.
Logical adaptationism.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 505-506.

 

Cheney, D., Seyfarth, R.
Another “Just So” story: How the leopard-guarders spot.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 506-507.

 

Churchland, P.M.
The ontological status of intentional states: Nailing folk psychology to its perch.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 507-508.

 

Cussins, A.
Dennett’s realisation theory of the relation between folk and scientific psychology.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 508-509.

 

Danto, A.C.
The notional world of D.C. Dennett.

BBS 1988 11 (3): 509-511.

 

Dretske, F.
The stance stance.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 511-512.

 

Dummett, M.
Dennett on belief.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 512-514.

 

Goldman, A.I.
Derived intentionality?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 514.

 

Griffin, D.R.
Real intentions?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 514-515.

 

Harman, G.
What is the intentional stance?
BBS 1988 11 (3): 515.

 

Kirsh, D.
Competence models are causal.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 515-517.

 

Kitcher, P., Kitcher, P.
The devil, the details, and Dr. Dennett.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 517-518.

 

Lycan, W.G.
Dennett’s instrumentalism.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 518-519.

 

MacLennan, B.J.
Causes and intentions.
BBS 1988 11 (3): 519-520.