Volume 07 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLE
Weiner, R.D.
Does electroconvulsive therapy cause brain damage?
BBS 1984 7 (1): 1-22.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Bidder, T.G.
Some perspectives on electroconvulsive therapy.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 22-23.
Bolwig, T.G.
ECT: Wanted and unwanted effects.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 23-24.
Breggin, P.R.
Electroshock therapy and brain damage: The acute organic brain syndrome as
treatment.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 24-25.
Cherkin, A.
Possible brain damage by electroconvulsive therapy: Memory impairment and
cultural resistance.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 25-26.
Dam, A.M.
Brain damage from spontaneous but not from induced seizures in animals.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 26.
Fink, M.
ECT – verdict: Not guilty.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 26-27.
Heath, R.G.
An overdue comprehensive look at a maligned treatment: Electroconvulsive therapy.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 27-28.
Kalinowsky, L.B.
Problems in research on electroconvulsive therapy.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 28-29.
Lerer, B.,
ECT-induced memory impairment – a cholinergic mechanism?
BBS 1984 7 (1): 29-30.
Pinel, J.P.J.
After forty-five years ECT is still controversial.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 30-31.
Price, T.R.P.
Modern ECT: Effective and safe.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 31-32.
Sackeim, H.A.
Not all seizures are created equal: The importance of ECT dose-response
variables.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 32-33.
Salzman, L.
Electroconvulsive therapy, pharmacotherapy, and psychotherapy.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 33.
Small, J.G., Small, I.F.
Current issues in ECT practice and research.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 33-34.
Squire, L.R.
Opinion and facts about ECT: Can science help?
BBS 1984 7 (1): 34-37.
Sugerman, A.A.
ECT: A clinicians viewpoint.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 37.
Swartz, C.M.
The justification for electroconvulsive therapy.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 37-38.
Taylor, J.R.
ECT: The controversy continues.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 38-39.
Templer, D.J.
ECT and brain damage: How much risk is acceptable?
BBS 1984 7 (1): 39.
Weaver, L.A. Jr.
ECT damage: Are there more pressing problems?
BBS 1984 7 (1): 39-40.
Zornetzer, S.F.
ECT: Out of the shadows and into the light.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 41.
Zubin, J.
Loss of familiarity as an explanation of autobiographical memory loss.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 41-42.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Weiner, R.D.
ECT: Facts, affects, and ambiguities.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 42-47.
TARGET ARTICLE
Broadbent, D.E.
The Maltese cross: A new simplistic model for memory.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 55-68.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Callaway, E.
Models of mind: Hidden plumbing.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 68-69.
Carr, T.H., Brown, T.L.
The Maltese cross: Simplistic yes, new no.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 69-71.
Cohen, G.
Modular mind or unitary system: A duck-rabbit effect.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 71-72.
Crowder, R.G.
Broadbent’s Maltese cross memory model: Wisdom, but not especially
unconventional.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 72.
Hirst, W.
Practice and divided attention.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 72-73.
Loftus, E.F., Loftus, G.R., Hunt, E.B.
Broadbent’s Maltese cross memory model: Something old, something
new, something borrowed, something missing.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 73-74.
Mackworth, A.K.
The homunculus as bureaucrat.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 74.
Martin, M.
Memory and mood.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 75.
Morton, J.
What kind of a framework?
BBS 1984 7 (1): 75-76.
Murray, D.J.
The usefulness for memory theory of the word “store.”
BBS 1984 7 (1): 76-77.
Rabbitt, P.
Simplistic heuristics and Maltese acrostics.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 77-78.
Roediger, H.L.
The use of interference paradigms as a criterion for separating
memory stores.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 78-79.
Sayre, K.M.
Information-flow diagrams as scientific models.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 79-80.
Schneider, W.
Practice, attention, and the processing system.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 80-81.
Seamon, J.G.
Pipelines, processing models, and the mind-body problem.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 81-82.
Sternberg, S.
Stage models of mental processing and the additive-factor method.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 82-84.
Wasserman, G.S.
How do representations get processed in real nerve cells?
BBS 1984 7 (1): 85.
Watkins, M.J.
Models as toothbrushes.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 86.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Broadbent, D.E.
Modules in models of memory.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 86-91.
TARGET ARTICLE
Maynard Smith, J.
Game theory and the evolution of behaviour.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 95-101.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Barlow, G.W., Rowell, T.E.
The contribution of game theory to animal behavior.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 101-103.
Cost-benefit analysis: An emotional calculus.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 103-104.
Einhorn, H.J.
Random strategies and “ran-dumb” behavior.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 104.
Fararo, T.J.
Evolutionary game-theory and human social structures.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 104-105.
Gilbert, M.
Coordination problems and the evolution of behavior.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 106-107.
Herrnstein, R.J., Vaughan, W. Jr.
Evolutionary and behavioral stability.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 107-108.
Development and the origin of behavioral strategies.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 108-109.
Krebs, J.R., Kacelnik, A.
Optimal learning rules.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 109-110.
Lea, S.E.G., Dow, S.M.
Optimization and flexibility.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 110-111.
Logue, A.W.
Is it possible to be optimal?
BBS 1984 7 (1): 111.
Malone, J.C.
Evolutionary game theory:
Suddenly it’s 1960! (or is it 1860?).
BBS 1984 7 (1): 112.
Mazur, J.E.
Is matching behavior an evolutionary inevitability?
BBS 1984 7 (1): 112-113.
Rachlin, H.
Learning rules and learning rules.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 113-114.
Rapoport, A.
Game theory without rationality.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 114-115.
Selten, R., Hammerstein, P.
Gaps in Harley’s argument on evolutionarily stable learning rules
and in the logic of “tit for tat.”
BBS 1984 7 (1): 115-116.
Staddon, J.E.R.
It’s all a game.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 116-117.
Thaler, R.H.
Asymmetric games and the endowment effect.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 117.
Williams, G.C.
When does game theory model reality?
BBS 1984 7 (1): 117.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Maynard Smith, J.
Game theory without rationality.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 117-122.
TARGET ARTICLE
Lamb, M.E., Thompson, R.M.,
Gardner, W., Charnov, E.L., Estes, D.
Security of infantile attachment as assessed in the “strange situation”: Its
study and biological interpretation.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 127-147.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Brown, R.T.
Ever since Hippocrates . . .
BBS 1984 7 (1): 147-148.
Chess, S.
What do we learn from the Strange Situation?
BBS 1984 7 (1): 148-149.
Cicchetti, D.V.
On a model for assessing the security of infantile attachment: Issues of
observer reliability and validity.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 149-150.
Denenberg, V.H.
Stranger in a strange situation: Comments by a comparative psychologist.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 150-152.
Feinman, S.
Correlations in search of a theory: Interpreting the predictive validity of
security of attachment.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 152-153.
Freedman, D.G.
Asking the right questions.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 153.
Ghiselin, M.T.
How to think about the evolution of behavioral development.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 153-154.
Grossmann, K.E., Grossmann, K.
Discovery and proof in attachment research.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 154-155.
Hay, D.F.
The evolution of ethological attachment theory.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 155-156.
Klopfer, P.H.
Caveats on the use of evolutionary concepts.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 156-157.
Kovach, J.K.,
Infantile attachment: The forest and the trees.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 157-158.
Masters, J.C.
Reification and “stratification” in attachment theory and research.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 158-159.
Mills, C.J., Eiserer,
Security of infantile attachment: The person-situation debate revisited.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 159-160.
Petrovich, S.B., Gewirtz, J.L.
Learning in the context of evolutionary biology: In search of synthesis.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 160-161.
Rajecki, D.W.
On inferring evolutionary adaptation.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 161-162.
Salzen, E.A.
Bonding behaviours, behavioural binds, and biological bases.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 162-163.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Lamb, M.E.,
Studying the security of
infant-adult attachment: A reprise.
BBS 1984 7 (1): 163-167.
Volume 07 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLE
Bickerton, D.
The language bioprogram hypothesis.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 173-188.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Bates, E.
Bioprograms and the innateness hypothesis.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 188-190.
Bloom, L.
A bioprogram for language: Not whether but how?
BBS 1984 7 (2): 190-191.
Cartmill, M.
Innate grammars and the evolutionary presumption.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 191.
Corne, C.
On the transmission of substratal features in creolization.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 191-192.
Cromer, R.F.
Language acquisition: Genetically encoded instructions or a set of processing
mechanisms?
BBS 1984 7 (2): 192-193.
Goodman, M.
Are creole structures innate?
BBS 1984 7 (2): 193-194.
Gopnik, M.
From pidgins to pigeons.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 194-195.
Hornstein, N.
Grades of nativism.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 195-196.
Jenkins, L.
Pidgins, creoles and universal grammar.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 196-197.
Keil, F.C.
Of pidgins and pigeons.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 197-198.
Lightfoot, D.W.
The relative richness of triggers and the bioprogram.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 198-199.
Marantz, A.
Creolization: Special evidence for innateness?
BBS 1984 7 (2): 199-200.
Maratsos, M.
How degenerate is the input to creoles and where do its biases come from?
BBS 1984 7 (2): 200-201.
Pidgins are everywhere.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 201.
Meier, R.P.
Sign as creole.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 201-202.
Mufwene, S.S.
The language bioprogram hypothesis, creole studies, and linguistic theory.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 202-203.
Muysken, P.
Do creoles give insight into the human language faculty?
BBS 1984 7 (2): 203-204.
Posner, R.
Creolization or linguistic change?
BBS 1984 7 (2): 204-205.
Roberts, P.A.
Problems with similarities across creoles and the development of creole
BBS 1984 7 (2): 205-206
Samarin, W.J.
Socioprogrammed linguistics.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 206-207.
Sampson, G.
Do creoles prove what “ordinary” languages don’t?
BBS 1984 7 (2): 207-208.
Seuren, P.A.M.
The bioprogram hypothesis: Facts and fancy.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 208-209.
Slobin, D.I.
Child language and the bioprogram.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 209-210.
Wang, W.S.Y.
Organum ex machina?
BBS 1984 7 (2): 210-211.
Woolford, E.
Why creoles won’t reveal the properties of universal grammar.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 211-212.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Bickerton, D.
Creole is still king.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 212-218.
TARGET ARTICLE
Tulving, E.
Précis of Elements of episodic memory.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 223-238.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Baddeley, A.D.
Neuropsychological evidence and the semantic/episodic distinction.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 238-239.
d’Ydewalle, G., Peeters, R.
There is more going on in the human mind.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 239-240.
Hintzman, D.L.
Episodic versus semantic memory: A distinction whose time has come – and gone?
BBS 1984 7 (2): 240-241.
Hirst, W.
Factual memory?
BBS 1984 7 (2): 241-242.
Jones, G.V.
Analyzing recognition and recall.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 242-243.
Kihlstrom, J.F.
A fact is a fact is a fact.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 243-244.
Klatzky, R.L.
Armchair theorists have more fun.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 244.
Lachman, R., Naus, M.J.
The episodic/semantic continuum in an evolved machine.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 244-246.
Loftus, E.F., Schooler, J.W.
Recoding processes in
memory.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 246.
Mccauley, R.N.
Inference and temporal coding in episodic memory.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 246-247.
Morton, J., Bekerian, D.A.
The episodic/semantic distinction: something worth arguing about.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 247-248.
Nilsson, L.-G.
Bridging gaps between concepts through GAPS.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 248-249.
Ohta, N.
The source of the long-term retention of priming effects.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 249-250.
Olton, D.S.
Comparative analysis of episodic memory.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 250-251.
Raaijmakers, J.G.W.
On falsifying the synergistic ecphory model.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 251-252.
Roediger, H.L.
Does current evidence from dissociation experiments favor the episodic/semantic
distinction?
BBS 1984 7 (2): 252-254.
Seamon, J.G.
The ontogeny of episodic and semantic memory.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 254.
Tajika, H.
Recognition and recall: The direct comparison experiment.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 254-255.
Tiberghien, G.
Just how does ecphory work?
BBS 1984 7 (2): 255-256.
Wolters, G.
Memory: Two systems or one system with many subsystems?
BBS 1984 7 (2): 256-257.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Tulving, E.
Relations among components and processes of memory.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 257-263.
TARGET ARTICLE
Sternberg, R.J.
Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 269-287.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Baron, J.
Criteria and explanations.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 287-288.
Cultural relativism comes in from the cold.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 288.
Carroll, J.B.
Some psychometric considerations.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 288-289.
Detterman, D.K.
Understand cognitive components before postulating metacomponents, etc., part 2.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 289-290.
Economos, J.
Intelligent dissension among the Archói is good for the people.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 290.
Eysenck, H.J.
Intelligence versus behavior.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 290-291.
Ford, M.E.
Finding the right tools for the task: An intelligent approach to the study of
intelligence.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 291-292
Humphreys, L.D.
A rose is not a rose: A rival view of intelligence.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 292-293.
Contexts of triarchic theory.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 293-294.
Intellectual giftedness: A theory worth doing well.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 294-295.
Jensen, A.R.
Mental speed and levels of analysis.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 295-296.
Olson, D.R.
In what sense does intelligence underlie an intelligent performance?
BBS 1984 7 (2): 296-297.
Pellegrino, J.W., Goldman, S.R.
Context and novelty in an integrated theory of intelligence.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 297-298.
Raaheim, K.
How intelligent can one be?
BBS 1984 7 (2): 298.
Richelle, M.N.
Intelligence, adaptation, and inverted selection.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 299-300.
Rogoff, B.
What are the interrelations among the three subtheories of Sternberg’s
triarchic theory of intelligence.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 300-301.
Triandis, H.C.
Speed and adaptivity in intelligence.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 301.
Some possible implications of Sternberg’s triarchic theory of intelligence.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 301-302.
Intelligence: Some neglected topics.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 302-303.
Yussen, S.R.
A triarchic reaction to a triarchic theory of intelligence.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 303.
Zimmerman, B.J.
Contextual and psychometric descriptions of intelligence: A fundamental
conflict.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 303-304.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Sternberg, R.J.
If at first you don’t believe, try “tri” again.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 304-312.
CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Plotkin, H.C., Odling-Smee, F.J.
A multiple-level model of
evolution and its implications for sociobiology.
BBS
1981 4(2): 225-268.
Baerends, G.P.
Evolution: Monolith or strawman – a matter of proper definitions and words.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 317-318.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Odling-Smee, F.J., Plotkin, H.C.
Evolution: Its levels and its units.
BBS 1984 7 (2): 318-320.
Volume 07 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLE
Ebbesson, Sven O.E.
Evolution and ontogeny of neural circuits.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 321-331.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Alberch, P.
A return to the Bauplan.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 332.
Braford, M.R. Jr.
Parcellation: An explanation of the arrangement of apples and oranges on a
severely pruned phylogenetic tree?
BBS 1984 7 (3): 332-333.
Bullock, T.H.
A milestone in comparative neurology: A specific hypothesis claims rules for
conservative connectivity.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 333-334.
Calvin, W.H.
Precision timing requirements suggest wider brain connections, not more
restricted ones.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 334.
Parcellation theory: New wine in old wineskins.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 334-335.
Clarke, P.G.H.
Parcellation: A hard theory to test.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 335.
Demski, L.S.
Can parcellation account for the evolution of behavioral plasticity associated
with large brains?
BBS 1984 7 (3): 335-336.
Diamond, I.T.
How do the lateral geniculate and pulvinar evolve?
BBS 1984 7 (3): 336-337.
Ewert, J.-P.
Behavioral selectivity based on thalamotectal interactions: Ontogenetic and
phylogenetic aspects in amphibians.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 337-338.
Falk, D.
Implications of the parcellation theory for paleoneurology.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 338.
Finger, T.E.
Is parcellation parsimonious?
BBS 1984 7 (3): 339.
Fritzsch, B.
Parcellation or invasion: A case for pluralism.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 339-340.
Innocenti, G.M.
On evolution by loss of exuberancy.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 340-341.
Ito, H.
Possibility of invasion in the sensory area.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 341-342.
Kaas, J.H.
Duplication of brain parts in evolution.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 342-343.
Koenderink, J.J.
Parcellation: A reflection of the structure of the animal’s world.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 343-344.
MacLean, P.D.
A brain theory commensurate with Procrustes’ bed.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 344-345.
Northcutt, R.G.
Parcellation: The resurrection of Hartsoeker and Haeckel.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 345.
Ramon-Moliner, E.
Exploratory neural connectivity.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 345-346.
Schneider, G.E.
Axon development and plasticity: Clues from species differences and suggestions
for mechanisms of evolutionary change.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 346-347.
Szentágothai, J.
Cytodiversification and parcellation.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 347-348.
Wilczynski, W.
The parcellation theory: What does the evidence tell us?
BBS 1984 7 (3): 348-349.
Willis, W.D., Kevetter, G.A.
The mammalian spinothalamic system and the parcellation hypothesis.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 349-350.
Young, J.Z.
Yes, but what is the basis of homology? An invertebrate parallel.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 350.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Ebbesson, Sven O.E.
An update of the parcellation theory.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 350-360.
TARGET ARTICLE
Hoyle, G.
The scope of neuroethology.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 367-381.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Arbib, M.A.
Neuroethology: A call for less exclusivity and more theory.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 381-382.
Bassler, U.
Neuroethology: An overnarrow definition can become a source of
dogmatism.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 382.
Bateson, P.
Flow diagrams and hydraulic models.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 382-383.
Bullock, T.H.
Neuroethology: In defense of open range; don’t fence me in.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 383.
Clarac, F.
Difficulties and relevance of a neuroethological approach to neurobiology.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 383-384.
Davis, J.
Neuroethology: Why put it in a straitjacket?
BBS 1984 7 (3): 384-385.
Delcomyn, F.
Can neuroethologists be led?
BBS 1984 7 (3): 385.
Ehret, G.
Disregarding vertebrates is neither useful nor necessary.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 385-386.
Erber, J.
Neuroethology or motorethology?
BBS 1984 7 (3): 386.
Ewert, J.-P.
Hoyle new view of neuroethology: Limited and restrictive.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 386-387.
Fernald, R.D.
Neuroethology according to Hoyle.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 387-388.
Grossberg, S.
Neuroethology and theoretical neurobiology.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 388-390.
Guthrie, D.M.
Can the aims of neuroethology be selective, while avoiding exclusivity?
BBS 1984 7 (3): 390-391.
Hinde, R.A.
Ethology has progressed.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 391.
Huber, F.
Neuroethology, according to Hoyle.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 391-392.
Ingle, D.J.
Vertebrate neuroethology: Doomed from the start.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 392-393.
Kupfermann, I.
They are really complex when you get to know them.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 393-394.
Leonard, J.L., Lukowiak, K.
The squishy revisisted: A call for ethological affirmative action.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 394.
Macmillan, D.L.
We are making good progress in the neural analysis of behavior.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 395.
Manning, A.
Neuroethology: Not losing sight of behavior.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 395-396.
Markl, H.
The ethology of neuroethology.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 396-397.
Rowell, C.H.F.
Resurrecting Lorenz’s hydraulic model: Phlogiston explained by quantum mechanics.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 397-398.
Schleidt, W.M.
Points of congruence between ethology and neuroscience.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 398-399.
Selverston, A.I.
Neuroethology: How exclusive a club?
BBS 1984 7 (3): 399-400.
Simmons, J.A.
Keep the scope of neuroethology broad.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 400-401.
Steklis, H.D.
The proper domain of neuroethology.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 401-402.
Walters, E.T.
Ethology and neuroethology: Easy accessibility has been and still is important.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 402-403.
Young, J.Z.
Is neuroethology wise?
BBS 1984 7 (3): 403.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Hoyle, G.
Neuroethology: To be, or not to be?
BBS 1984 7 (3): 403-408.
TARGET ARTICLE
Zuckerman, M.
Sensation seeking: A comparative approach to a human trait.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 413-434.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Baldwin, J.D.
A balanced emphasis on environmental influences.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 434-435.
Barratt, E.S.
Personality traits: Causation, correlation, or neo-Bayesian.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 435-436.
Callaway, E.
Suppose it’s not so simple.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 436.
Claridge, G.
Going over the top with optimal arousal.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 436-437.
The logic of the comparative approach.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 437-438.
Clavier, R.A.
Monoamines and human traits: A nice idea, but . . .
BBS 1984 7 (3): 438-439.
Eterović, V.A., Ferchmin, P.A.
Are sensation-seeking behavior, sleep patterns, and brain plasticity related.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 439-440.
Eysenck, H.J.
The comparative approach in personality study.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 440-441.
Gray, J.A.
Is there a relationship between sensation seeking and strength of the nervous system?
BBS 1984 7 (3): 441.
Haier, R.J.
Sensation seeking and augmenting-reducing: Does a nerve have nerve?
BBS 1984 7 (3): 441-442.
Izard, C.E.
Emotion variables as personality traits.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 442-443.
Knorring, L. von.
The biochemical basis of sensation-seeking behavior.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 443-445.
Katz, R.J.
Sensation seeking: A clarification, a caveat, and a conjecture.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 443.
Mason, S.T.
The noradrenergic locus coeruleus – the center of attention?
BBS 1984 7 (3): 445.
Neufeld, R.W.J.
Physiological substrates of a psychological dimension.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 445-446.
Panksepp, J., Siviy, S.
Spanning the transspecies gulf.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 446-447.
Biochemical substrates for a human “sensation-seeking” trait.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 447-448.
Royce, J.R.
The concept of sensation seeking and the structure of personality.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 448-449.
Simmel, E.C.
Sensation seeking: Exploration of empty spaces or novel stimuli.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 449-450.
Sokolov, E.N.
Sensation seeking and the orienting reflex.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 450.
Stelmack, R.M.
Sensation seeking, orientation, and defense: Empirical and theoretical
reservations.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 450-451.
Strelau, J.
Zuckerman’s sensation-seeking theory: A view from
BBS 1984 7 (3): 451-452.
Suedfeld, P.
Sensation seeking: Where is the meat in the stew?
BBS 1984 7 (3): 452-453.
Wohlwill, J.F.
What are sensation seekers seeking?
BBS 1984 7 (3): 453.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Zuckerman, M.
Home from a perilous journey.
BBS 1984 7 (3): 453-464.
Volume 07 – Issue
CANONICAL PAPERS OF
B.F. SKINNER
INTRODUCTION
The operant behaviorism of
B.F. Skinner.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 473-475.
TARGET ARTICLE
Skinner, B.F.
Selection by consequences.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 477-481.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Barlow, G.W.
Skinner on selection: A case study of intellectual isolation.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 481-482.
Bolles, R.C.
On the status of causal modes.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 482-483.
Boulding, K.E.
B.F. Skinner: A dissident view.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 483-484.
Campbell, C.B.G.
Behaviorism and natural selection.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 484.
Dahlbom, B.
Skinner, selection, and self-control.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 484-486.
Dawkins, R.
Replicators, consequences, and displacement activities.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 486-487.
Donahoe, J.W.
Skinner – The Darwin of ontogeny?
BBS 1984 7 (4): 487-488.
Gamble, T.J.
The wider context of selection by consequences.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 488-489.
Ghiselin, M.T.
The emancipation of thought and culture from their original material substrates.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 489.
Hallpike, C.R.
Fitting culture into a Skinner box.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 489-490.
Harris, M.
Group and individual effects in selection.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 490-491.
Honig, W.K.
On the stabilization of behavioral selection.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 491-492.
Katz, M.J.
Cause and effect in evolution.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 492.
Smith, J.M.
A one-sided view of evolution.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 493.
Plotkin, H.C., Odling-Smee, F.J.
Linear and circular causal sequences.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 493-494.
Provine, R.R.
Contingency-governed science.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 494-495.
Fitness, reinforcement, underlying mechanisms.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 495-496.
Rumbaugh, D.M.
Perspectives by consequences.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 496-497.
Schull, J.
Selectionism, mentalisms, and behaviorism.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 497-498.
Solomon,
BBS 1984 7 (4): 498.
Selection misconstrued.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 499.
Timberlake, W.
Selection by consequences: A universal causal mode?
BBS 1984 7 (4): 499-501.
Vaughan, W. Jr.
Giving up the ghost.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 501.
Wyrwicka, W.
Natural selection and operant behavior.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 501-502.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Skinner, B.F.
Some consequences of selection.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 502-509.
TARGET ARTICLE
Skinner, B.F.
Methods and theories in the experimental analysis of behavior.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 511-523.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Deitz, S.M.
Real people, ordinary language, and natural measurement.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 524-525.
Luce, R.D.
Behavior-theory: a contradiction in terms.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 525-526.
Mackenzie, B.
The challenge to Skinner’s theory of behavior.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 526-527.
Marriott, F.H.C.
The role of the statistician in psychology.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 527.
Millward, R.
Cognitive science: A different approach to scientific psychology.
BBS 1984 7 (4): 527-529.
Moravcsik, J.M.E.
Should we return to the laboratory to find out about learning?
BBS 1984 7 (4): 529.