Volume 05 – Issue 01 – March 1982

TARGET ARTICLE

Lumsden, C.J., Wilson, E.O.
Précis of Genes, Mind, and Culture.

BBS 1982 5(1): 1-7.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Barash, D.P.
From genes to mind to culture: Biting the bullet at last.
BBS 1982 5(1): 7-8.

Caplan, A.L.
Stalking the wild culturgen.
BBS 1982 5(1): 8-9.

Charlesworth, W.R.
The epigenetic connection between genes and culture: Environment to the rescue.
BBS 1982 5(1): 9-10.

Fagen, R.
Epigenesis and culture.
BBS 1982 5(1): 10.

Ghiselin, M.T.
On mechanisms of cultural evolution, and the evolution of language and the common law.
BBS 1982 5(1): 11.

Gruber, H.E.
Genes for general intellect rather than particular culture.
BBS 1982 5(1): 11-12.

Hallpike, C.R.
The “culturgen”: Science or science-fiction?
BBS 1982 5(1): 12-13.

Hartl, D.L.
A too simple view of population-genetics.
BBS 1982 5(1): 13-14.

Johnston, T.D.
Concepts of development in the mathematics of cultural change.
BBS 1982 5(1): 14-15.

????, J.K.

From genes to culture: The missing links.

BBS 9182 5(1): 15-17

Loftus, G.R.
Top-down guidance from a bottom-up theory.
BBS 1982 5(1): 17-18.

Markl, H.
The power of reduction and the limits of compressibility.
BBS 1982 5(1): 18-19.

Masters, R.D.
Toward a natural science of human culture.
BBS 1982 5(1): 19-20.

Smith, J.M.
Mind and the linkage between genes and culture.
BBS 1982 5(1): 20-21.

Plutchik, R.
Genes, mind, and emotion.
BBS 1982 5(1): 21-22.

Rosenberg, A.
Are there culturgens?
BBS 1982 5(1): 22-24.

Schubert, G.
Epigenesis - the newer synthesis?
BBS 1982 5(1): 24-25.

Shepher, J.
Collaboration between biology and the social sciences: A milestone.
BBS 1982 5(1): 25-26.

Slobodkin, L.B.
A bully pulpit.
BBS 1982 5(1): 26-27.

Vandenberghe, P.L.
Resistance to biological self-understanding.
BBS 1982 5(1): 27.

Van Gulick, R.
Information, feedback, and transparency.
BBS 1982 5(1): 27-29.

Williams, T.R.
Genes, mind and culture: A turning point.
BBS 1982 5(1): 29-30.

Wohlwill, J.F.
The place of mind, and the limits of amplification.
BBS 1982 5(1): 30-31.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Lumsden, C.J., Wilson, E.O.
Genes and culture, protest and communication.
BBS 1982 5(1): 31-37.

TARGET ARTICLE

Wise, R.A.
Neuroleptics and operant-behavior: The anhedonia hypothesis.
BBS 1982 5(1): 39-53.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Anisman, H.
Anhedonia: Too much, too soon.
BBS 1982 5(1): 53-54.

Arbuthnott, G.W.
Support for the hypothesis that the actions of dopamine are “not
merely motor.”
BBS 1982 5(1): 54-55.

?????, R.J.
The behavioral function of dopamine.
BBS 1982 5(1): 55-56.

Ettenberg, A.
Behavioral effects of neuroleptics: performance deficits, reward deficits or both.
BBS 1982 5(1): 56-57.

Freed, W.J., Zec, R.F.
Criteria for ruling out sedation as an interpretation of neuroleptic effects.
BBS 1982 5(1): 57-59.

German, D.C.
Dopamine neurons, reward and behavior.
BBS 1982 5(1): 59-60.

Katz, L.D.
Hedonic arousal, memory, and motivation.
BBS 1982 5(1): 60.

Katz, R.J.
Dopamine and the limits of behavioral reduction—or why aren’t all schizophrenics fat and happy.
BBS 1982 5(1): 60-61.

Klemm, W.R.
Time for a new synthesis of hedonia mechanisms: Interaction of
multiple and interdependent reinforcer systems.
BBS 1982 5(1): 61-63.

Koob, G.F.
The dopamine anhedonia hypothesis - a pharmacological phrenology.
BBS 1982 5(1): 63-64.

Liebman, J.
Understanding neuroleptics: From anhedonia to “neuroleptothesia.”
BBS 1982 5(1): 64-65.

Lyness, W.H.
Dopaminergic and serotonergic influence on d-amphetamine self-administration: Alterations of reward perception.
BBS 1982 5(1): 65.

Lyons, W.
The anhedonia vs. the eclectic hypothesis.
BBS 1982 5(1): 65-66.

Mellgren, R.L.
The anhedonia hypothesis: Termites in the basement.
BBS 1982 5(1): 67-68.

Malmo, R.B., Malmo, H.P.
Wise neural model implicating the reticular formation: Some queries.
BBS 1982 5(1): 66-67.

Milgram, N.W.
On the generality of the anhedonia hypothesis.
BBS 1982 5(1): 69.

Neill, D.
Problems of concept and vocabulary in the anhedonia hypothesis.
BBS 1982 5(1): 70.

Nemeroff, C.B., Luttinger, D.
The anhedonia hypothesis of neuroleptic drug action: Basic and
clinical considerations.
BBS 1982 5(1): 70-71.

Panksepp, J.
The pleasure in brain substrates of foraging.
BBS 1982 5(1): 71-72.

Rech, R.H.
Neurolepsis: Anhedonia or blunting of emotional reactivity.
BBS 1982 5(1): 72-73.

Sinnamon, H.M.
The reward-effort model: An economic framework for examining the mechanism of neuroleptic action.
BBS 1982 5(1): 73-75.

Solomon, P.R., Crider, A.
Attention, dopamine, and schizophrenia.
BBS 1982 5(1): 75-76.

Soubrié, P.
Neuroleptic-induced anhedonia: Some psychopharmacological implications.
BBS 1982 5(1): 76-77.

Tombaugh, T.N.
A discriminating case against anhedonia.
BBS 1982 5(1): 77-78.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Wise, R.A.
Hypotheses of neuroleptic action: Levels of progress.
BBS 1982 5(1): 78-82.

TARGET ARTICLE

Anisman, H., Zacharko, R.M.
Depression: The predisposing influence of stress.
BBS 1982 5(1): 89-99.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Akiskal, H.S.
Is stress a predisposing or precipitating factor in clinical depression?
BBS 1982 5(1): 99-100.

Bauer, R.M.
Depression, neurotransmitters, and stress: Some neuropsychological implications.
BBS 1982 5(1): 100-101.

Beck, A.T., Harrison, R.P.
Stress, neurochemical substrates, and depression: Concomitants
are not necessarily causes.
BBS 1982 5(1): 101-102.

Burchfield, S.R.
The psychological homeostatic response to stress and its relationship to depression.
BBS 1982 5(1): 102-103.

Chute, D.L.
Does a commonality of neurochemical sequellae imply a relationship between stress and depression?
BBS 1982 5(1): 103.

de Catanzaro, D.
Biological fitness and affective variation.
BBS 1982 5(1): 103-104.

Dimsdale, J.E.
Appraising psychobiological approaches to the influence of stress on depression.
BBS 1982 5(1): 104-105.

Hamilton, V.
A cognitive/information-processing approach to the relationship
between stress and depression.
BBS 1982 5(1): 105-106.

Hankoff, L.D.
A tripartite physiology of depression.
BBS 1982 5(1): 106-107.

Heninger, G.R.
Monoamine receptor sensitivity and antidepressants.
BBS 1982 5(1): 107-108.

Hingtgen, J.N., Aprison, M.H.
Hypersensitive serotonergic receptors and depression.
BBS 1982 5(1): 108-109.

Kalat, J.W.
Triggering stimuli and the problem of persistence.
BBS 1982 5(1): 109.

Kraemer, G.W.
Neurochemical correlates of stress and depression: Depletion or disorganization.
BBS 1982 5(1): 110.

Laborit, H.

Depression and the action inhibitory system (ais).
BBS 1982 5(1): 111.

Leshner, A.I.
An alternative hypothesis of depression.
BBS 1982 5(1): 111-112.

Lester, D.
On the utility of stress as an explanatory concept.
BBS 1982 5(1): 112-113.

Mason, S.T.
Schizophrenia, not depression, as a result of depleted brain noradrenaline.
BBS 1982 5(1): 113-114.

McKinney, W.T. Jr.
Coping, depression, and neurotransmitters.
BBS 1982 5(1): 114-115.

Murison, R., Ursin, H.
Stress as activation.
BBS 1982 5(1): 115-116.

Neugebauer, R.
Documenting the association of stress (or stressors) with depressive-illness.
BBS 1982 5(1): 116-117.

Noll, K.M., Davis, J.M.
Stress, learning, and neurochemistry in affective disorder.
BBS 1982 5(1): 117-119.

Rosenthal, T.L.
Stress: Chicken or egg?
BBS 1982 5(1): 119.

Rush, D.K.
Is chronic stress better than acute stress?
BBS 1982 5(1): 119-120.

Sacco, W.P.
Problems with a stress-depression model.
BBS 1982 5(1): 120-121.

Sherman, A.D., Petty, F.
Stress and depression, and helplessness.
BBS 1982 5(1): 121-122.

Stone, E.A.
Noradrenergic function during stress and depression: An alternative view.
BBS 1982 5(1): 122.

Usdin, E.
Stress (whatever that is) and depression.
BBS 1982 5(1): 122-123.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Anisman, H., Zacharko, R.M.
Stressing our points.
BBS 1982 5(1): 123-129.

TARGET ARTICLE

Smith, P.K.
Does play matter? Functional and evolutionary aspects of animal and human play.
BBS 1982 5(1): 139-155.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Baldwin, J.D.
The nature-nurture error again.
BBS 1982 5(1): 155-156.

Bekoff, M.
Functional aspects of play as revealed by structural components
and social interaction patterns.
BBS 1982 5(1): 156-157.

Berman, C.M.
Functions of play: First steps toward evolutionary explanation.
BBS 1982 5(1): 157-158.

Bernstein, I.S.
Hypotheses about play.
BBS 1982 5(1): 158-159.

Burghardt, G.M.
Comparison matters - curiosity, bears, surplus energy and why reptiles don’t play.
BBS 1982 5(1): 159-160.

Csikszentmihalyi, M.
Does being human matter? On some interpretive problems of comparative ludology.
BBS 1982 5(1): 160.

Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I.
The flexibility and affective autonomy of play.
BBS 1982 5(1): 160-162.

Fagen, R.
Skill and flexibility in animal play behavior.
BBS 1982 5(1): 162.

Fassino, M.
Play: Structure and function.
BBS 1982 5(1): 162-163.

Fein, G.G.
Skill and intelligence: The functions of play.
BBS 1982 5(1): 163-164.

Ferchmin, P.A., Eterović, V.A.
Play stimulated by environmental complexity alters brain and improves learning abilities in rodents, primates, and possibly humans.
BBS 1982 5(1): 164.

Ghiselin, M.T.
On the evolution of play by means of artificial selection.
BBS 1982 5(1): 165.

Lancy, D.F.
Some missed opportunities in theories of play.
BBS 1982 5(1): 165-166.

Lewis, M.
Play as whimsy.
BBS 1982 5(1): 166.

McGhee, P.E.
Explaining the evolutionary significance of intellectual play: Are we barking up the wrong tree?
BBS 1982 5(1): 166-167.

Poirier, F.E.
Play—immediate or long-term adaptiveness.
BBS 1982 5(1): 167-168.

Schwartzman, H.B.
Play as a mode.
BBS 1982 5(1): 168-169.

Suomi, S.J.
Why does play matter?
BBS 1982 5(1): 169-170.

Suttonsmith, B.
The epistemology of the play theorist.
BBS 1982 5(1): 170-171.

Vandenberg, B.
The essentials of play?
BBS 1982 5(1): 171-172.

Wolf, D.P.
The facts about fantasy.
BBS 1982 5(1): 172.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Smith, P.K.
The current state of play.
BBS 1982 5(1): 172-178.

Volume 05 – Issue 02 – June 1982

TARGET ARTICLE

Peters, D.P., Ceci, S.J.
Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again.
BBS 1982 5(2): 187-195.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Adair, R.K.
A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci’s peer-review study.
BBS 1982 5(2): 196.

Armstrong, J.S.
Barriers to scientific contributions: The authors formula.
BBS 1982 5(2): 197-199.

Bartko, J.J.
The fate of published articles, submitted again.
BBS 1982 5(2): 199.

Beaver, D.D.
On the failure to detect previously published research.
BBS 1982 5(2): 199-200.

Belshaw, C.
Peer review and the Current Anthropology experience.
BBS 1982 5(2): 200-201.

Bernard, H.R.
Computer-assisted referee selection as a means of reducing potential editorial bias.
BBS 1982 5(2): 202.

Beyer, J.M.
Explaining an unsurprising demonstration: High rejection rates.
and scarcity of space.
BBS 1982 5(2): 202-203.

Blissett, M.
Peer review and the structure of knowledge.
BBS 1982 5(2): 203-204.

Chubin, D.E.
Reforming peer-review: From recycling to reflexivity.
BBS 1982 5(2): 204.

Cicchetti, D.V.
On peer-review: “We have met the enemy and he is us.”
BBS 1982 5(2): 205.

Colman, A.M.
Manuscript evaluation by journal referees and editors: Randomness or bias?
BBS 1982 5(2): 205-206.

Cone, J.D.
Criterion problems in journal review practices.
BBS 1982 5(2): 206-207.

Crandall, R.
Editorial responsibilities in manuscript review.
BBS 1982 5(2): 207-208.

Debakey, L.
Authorship and manuscript reviewing: The risk of bias.
BBS 1982 5(2): 208-209.

Eckberg, D.L.
Theoretical implications of failure to detect prepublished submissions.
BBS 1982 5(2): 209-210.

Fleiss, J.L.
Deception in the study of the peer-review process.
BBS 1982 5(2): 210-211.

Geen, R.G.
Review bias: Positive or negative, good or bad?
BBS 1982 5(2): 211.

Glenn, N.D.
The journal article review process as a game of chance.
BBS 1982 5(2): 211-212.

Goodstein, L.D.
When will the editors start to edit?
BBS 1982 5(2): 212-213.

Gordon, M.D.
Cognitive relativism and peer-review bias.
BBS 1982 5(2): 212.

Gordon, R.A.
Optional published refereeing.
BBS 1982 5(2): 213-214.

Griffith, B.C.
Judging document content versus social functions of refereeing: Possible and impossible tasks.
BBS 1982 5(2): 214-215.

Hartley, J.
Scientific communication: So where do we go from here?
BBS 1982 5(2): 215-216.

Hogan, R.
The insufficiencies of methodological inadequacy.
BBS 1982 5(2): 216.

Honig, W.M.
Peer-review in the physical sciences: An editor’s view.
BBS 1982 5(2): 216-217.

Horrobin, D.F.
Peer review: A philosophically faulty concept which is proving
disastrous for science.
BBS 1982 5(2): 217-218.

Howe, M.J.A.
Peer reviewing: Improve or be rejected.
BBS 1982 5(2): 218-219.

Lazarus, D.
Interreferee agreement and acceptance rates in physics.
BBS 1982 5(2): 219.

Louttit, R.T.
Peer review: Prediction of the future or judgment of the past?
BBS 1982 5(2): 219-220.

Mahoney, M.J.
Publication, politics, and scientific progress.
BBS 1982 5(2): 220-221.

Manwell, C., Baker, C.M.A.
Reform peer review: The Peters and Ceci study in the context of other current studies of scientific evaluation.
BBS 1982 5(2): 221-225.

Millman, J.
Making the plausible implausible: A favorable review of Peters
and Ceci’s target article.
BBS 1982 5(2): 225-226.

Mindick, B.
When we practice to deceive: The ethics of a metascientific inquiry.
BBS 1982 5(2): 226-227.

Mitroff, I.I.
Designing peer-review for the subjective as well as the objective side of science.
BBS 1982 5(2): 227-228.

Moravcsik, M.J.
Rejecting published work: It couldn’t happen in physics! (or could it?).

BBS 1982 5(2): 228-229.

Nelson, K.
Reliability, bias or quality: What is the issue?
BBS 1982 5(2): 229.

Over, R.
What is the source of bias in peer review?
BBS 1982 5(2): 229-230.

Palermo, D.S.
Biases, decisions and auctorial rebuttal in the peer-review process.
BBS 1982 5(2): 230-231.

Perlman, D.
Reviewer “bias”: Do Peters and Ceci protest too much?
BBS 1982 5(2): 231-232.

Perloff, R.M., Perloff, R.
Improving research on and policies for peer-review practices.
BBS 1982 5(2): 232-233.

Porter, A.L.
2004: A scenario of peer-review in the future.
BBS 1982 5(2): 233-234.

Presser, S.
Reviewer reliability: Confusing random error with systematic error or bias.
BBS 1982 5(2): 234-235.

Rosenthal, R.
Reliability and bias in peer-review practices.
BBS 1982 5(2): 235-236.

Ross, C.
Rejecting published work: Similar fate for fiction.
BBS 1982 5(2): 236.

Rubin, D.B.
Rejection, rebuttal, revision: Some flexible features of peer review.
BBS 1982 5(2): 236-237.

Scarr, S.
Anosmic peer review: A rose by another name is evidently not a
rose.
BBS 1982 5(2): 237-238.

Scott, W.A.
Referee report on an earlier draft of Peters and Ceci’s target article.
BBS 1982 5(2): 238.

Tax, S., Rubinstein, R.A.
Responsibility in reviewing and research.
BBS 1982 5(2): 238-240.

Thomas, G.J.
Perhaps it was right to reject the resubmitted manuscripts.
BBS 1982 5(2): 240.

White, M.J.
Some procedural obscurities in Peters and Ceci’s peer-review study.
BBS 1982 5(2): 241.

Whitehurst, G.J.
The quandary of manuscript reviewing.
BBS 1982 5(2): 241-242.

Wilson, W.A. Jr.
Research on peer-review practices: Problems of interpretation, application, and propriety.
BBS 1982 5(2): 242-243.

Witt, J.C., Hannafin, M.J.
Experimenter and reviewer bias.
BBS 1982 5(2): 243-244.

Yalow, R.S.
Competency testing for reviewers and editors.
BBS 1982 5(2): 244.

Zeaman, D.
Reliability and validity of peer review.
BBS 1982 5(2): 245.

Ziman, J.
Bias, incompetence, or bad management?
BBS 1982 5(2): 245-246.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Peters, D.P., Ceci, S.J.
Peer-review research: Objections and obligations.
BBS 1982 5(2): 246-252.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Brainerd, C.J.

The stage question in cognitive-developmental theory.

BBS 1978 1(2): 175-213.

Perret-Clermont, A.-N.
From the study of stages to the understanding of the processes involved in the cognitive development of child and pupil.
BBS 1982 5(2): 259-260.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Brainerd, C.J.
Task descriptions and circularity.
BBS 1982 5(2): 260-261.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Corballis, M.C. and Morgan, M.J.

On the biological basis of human laterality: I. Evidence for a maturational left-right gradient and II. The mechanisms of inheritance.

BBS 1978 1(2): 261-336.

Policansky, D.
Flatfishes and the inheritance of asymmetries.
BBS 1982 5(2): 262-265.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Morgan, M.J., Corballis, M.C.
Symmetrical inheritance of asymmetry in the flounder?
BBS 1982 5(2): 265-266.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I.

Human ethology: Concepts and implications for the sciences of man.

BBS 1979 2(1): 1-57.

Reynolds, P.C.
Affect and instrumentality: An alternative view of Professor Eibl- Eibesfeldt’s human ethology.
BBS 1982 5(2): 267-273.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I.
Interactionism, content, and language in human ethological studies.
BBS 1982 5(2): 273-274.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Toates, F.M.

Homeostasis and drinking.

BBS 1979 2(1): 95-139.

Walsh, L.L.
Regulation of water intake: Importance of genotype.
BBS 1982 5(2): 274-275.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Toates, F.M.
Hysteresis and habit.
BBS 1982 5(2): 275.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Wasserman, G.S. and Kong, K.-L.

Absolute timing of mental activities.

BBS 1979 2(2): 243-304.

Rollman, G.B.
The timing of mental activities with nonvisual stimuli.
BBS 1982 5(2): 276-277.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Wasserman, G.S.
Temporal summation and stimulus modality.
BBS 1982 5(2): 278-281.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Parker, S.T. and Gibson, K.R.

A developmental model of the evolution of language and intelligence in early homonids.

BBS 1979 2(3): 367-407.

Fischer, K.W.
Human cognitive development in the first four years.
BBS 1982 5(2): 282-283.

Fouts, R.S.
Homo does not cogitate because of bread alone: Or, “I eat therefore
I think?”
BBS 1982 5(2): 283.

Gottlieb, G., Johnston, T.D., Scoville, R.P.
Conceptions of development and the evolution of behavior.
BBS 1982 5(2): 284.

Jerison, H.J.

Problems with Piaget and Pallia.
BBS 1982 5(2): 284-287.

Steklis, H.D.
Control mechanisms of vocalization and the evolution of speech.
BBS 1982 5(2): 287.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Gibson, K.R., Parker, S.T.
Brain structure, Piaget, and adaption, or, “No, I think, therefore
I eat.”
BBS 1982 5(2): 288-292.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Dismukes, R.K.

New concepts of molecular communication among neurons.

BBS 1979 2(3): 409-448.

Van Valen, L.M.
Why is there more than one neurotransmitter?
BBS 1982 5(2): 294.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Haber, R.N.

Twenty years of haunting eidetic imagery: Where’s the ghost?

BBS 1979 2(4): 583-629.

Freides, D.
The ghost is in the other eye: The eidetic image is monocular.
BBS 1982 5(2): 295-296.

Kuipers, B.
What do eidetic images tell us about vision?
BBS 1982 5(2): 296.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Haber, R.N.
Eidetic imagery, monocularity and computational models of vision.
BBS 1982 5(2): 297-298.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Chomsky, N.

Rules and representations.

BBS 1980 3(1): 1-61.

Royce, J.R.
On Chomsky and the biopsychological basis of language.
BBS 1982 5(2): 298-299.

Sampson, G.
Linguistic nativism: What acquisition rate would count in favor of learning?
BBS 1982 5(2): 299.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Chomsky, N.
Genes, experience, and language.
BBS 1982 5(2): 299-300.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Fodor, J.A.

Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology.

BBS 1980 3(1): 63-109.

Sober, E.
Rational and naturalistic biology.
BBS 1982 5(2): 300-302.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Fodor, J.A.
Projectibility and reference.
BBS 1982 5(2): 302.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Pylshyn, Z.W.

Computation and cognition: Issues in the foundations of cognitive science.

BBS 1980 3(1): 63-109.

Kugler, P.N., Turvey, M.T., Shaw, R.
Is the “cognitive penetrability” criterion invalidated by contemporary physics?
BBS 1982 5(2): 303-306.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on McGlone, J.

Sex differences in human brain symmetry: A critical survey.

BBS 1980 3(2): 215-263.

Dimond, S.J.
Whole brain testing versus hemisphere testing.
BBS 1982 5(2): 307.

Inglis, J., Lawson, J.S.
Sex-differences in the functional asymmetry of the damaged brain.
BBS 1982 5(2): 307-310.

Kertesz, A.
Sex distribution in aphasia.
BBS 1982 5(2): 310.

Mateer, C.A., Polen, S.B., Ojemann, G.A.
Sexual variation in cortical localization of naming as determined by stimulation mapping.
BBS 1982 5(2): 310-311.

Petersen, A.C.
A biopsychosocial perspective on sex differences in the human brain.
BBS 1982 5(2): 312.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

McGlone, J.
Faulty logic fuels controversy.
BBS 1982 5(2): 312-314.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on deCantazaro, D.

Human suicide: A biological perspective.

BBS 1980 3(2): 265-290.

Pitman, R.K.
Redirected aggression and suicide.
BBS 1982 5(2): 315-316.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

deCatanzaro, D.
Suicide, aggression, and natural selection.
BBS 1982 5(2): 316-317.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Bolles, R.C. and Fanselow, M.S.

A perceptual-defensive-recuperative model of fear and pain.

BBS 1980 3(2): 291-323.

Mackintosh, N.J.
Conditioning as compensation?
BBS 1982 5(2): 318.

Ursin, H.
Pain is pain and fear is fear.
BBS 1982 5(2): 318-320.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Fanselow, M.S., Bolles, R.C.
Independence and competition in aversive motivation.
BBS 1982 5(2): 320-322.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Jensen, A.R.

Précis of Bias in Mental Testing.

BBS 1980 3(3): 325-371.

Darlington, R.B., Boyce, C.M.
The validity of Jensen’s statistical methods.
BBS 1982 5(2): 323-324.

Hirsch, J., Tully, T.P.
The challenge is unmet.
BBS 1982 5(2): 324-326.

Kempthorne, O., Wolins, L.
Testing reveals a big social problem.
BBS 1982 5(2): 327-336.

Vetta, A.
IQ or intelligence?
BBS 1982 5(2): 336-337.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Jensen, A.R.
Bias in mental testing: A final word.
BBS 1982 5(2): 337.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Searle, J.R.

Minds, brains, and programs.

BBS 1980 3(3): 417-457.

Edelson, T.
Stimulating understanding: Making the example fit the question.
BBS 1982 5(2): 338-339.

McDermott, D.
Minds, brains, programs and persons.
BBS 1982 5(2): 339-341.

Rachlin, H.

Minds, pains and performance.
BBS 1982 5(2): 341.

Samet, J.
Understanding and integration.
BBS 1982 5(2): 341-342.

Savitt, S.F.
Searle’s demon and the brain simulator.
BBS 1982 5(2): 342-343.

Smythe, W.E.
Rule following and rule reduction.
BBS 1982 5(2): 343-344.

Wilks, Y.
Searle’s straw men.
BBS 1982 5(2): 344-345.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Searle, J.R.
The Chinese room revisited.
BBS 1982 5(2): 345-348.

CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Sternberg, R.J.

Sketch of a componential subtheory of human intelligence.

BBS 1980 3(4): 573-614.

Egan, D.E.
A heuristic for componential analysis: “Try old goals.”
BBS 1982 5(2): 348-350.

AUTHORS’ RESPONSE

Sternberg, R.J., Davidson, J.E.
Componential analysis and componential theory.
BBS 1982 5(2): 350-351.

Volume 05 – Issue 03 – September 1982

TARGET ARTICLE

Roitblat, H.L.
The meaning of representation in animal memory.
BBS 1982 5(3): 353-372.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Branch, M.N.
Misrepresenting behaviorism.
BBS 1982 5(3): 372-373.

Capaldi, E.J.
Memory and rules in animal serial learning.
BBS 1982 5(3): 373.

Catania, A.C.
Antimisrepresentationalism.
BBS 1982 5(3): 374-375.

Danto, A.C.
Behaviorism’s new cognitive representations: Paradigm regained.
BBS 1982 5(3): 375.

Delius, J.D.
Memory: A matter of fitness.
BBS 1982 5(3): 375-376.

Dretske, F.
The informational character of representations.
BBS 1982 5(3): 376-377.

Epstein, R.
Representation: A concept that fills no gaps.
BBS 1982 5(3): 377-378.

Gopnik, M.
Some distinctions among representations.
BBS 1982 5(3): 378-379.

Hulse, S.H.
Comparative cognition revisited.
BBS 1982 5(3): 379.

Jaynes, J.
Representations as metaphiers.
BBS 1982 5(3): 379-380.

Lachman, R., Lachman, J.L.
Memory representations in animals: Some metatheoretical issues.
BBS 1982 5(3): 380-381.

Logue, A.W.
Cognitive psychology’s representation of behaviorism.

BBS 1982 5(3): 381-382.

Marshall, J.C.

A la représentation du temps perdu.
BBS 1982 5(3): 382-383.

Nadel, L.
Some thoughts on the proper foundations for the study of cognition in animals.
BBS 1982 5(3): 383-384.

Nelson, R.J.
On the content of representations.
BBS 1982 5(3): 384.

Roberts, W.A.
Premature closure of controversial issues concerning animal memory representations.
BBS 1982 5(3): 384-385.

Rozeboom, W.W.
The logic of representation.
BBS 1982 5(3): 385-386.

Segal, E.M.
Metatheory of animal behavior.
BBS 1982 5(3): 386-387.

Sheafor, P.J.
Expectancy: The endogenous source of anticipatory activities, including “pseudo-conditioned” responses.
BBS 1982 5(3): 387-389.

Shimp, C.P.
Historicism, behaviorism, and the conceptual status of memory representations in animals.
BBS 1982 5(3): 389-390.

Staddon, J.E.R.
In the beginning was the word.
BBS 1982 5(3): 390-391.

Terrace, H.T.
Animal versus human minds.
BBS 1982 5(3): 391-392.

Uttal, W.R.
Internal representations and indeterminacy: A skeptical view.
BBS 1982 5(3): 392-393.

Wilson, M.
Mind the brain.
BBS 1982 5(3): 393.

Zentall, T.R.
The heuristic value of representation.
BBS 1982 5(3): 393-394.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Roitblat, H.L.
Representations and cognition.
BBS 1982 5(3): 394-401.

TARGET ARTICLE

Panksepp, J.
Toward a general psychobiological theory of emotions.
BBS 1982 5(3): 407-422.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Anisman, H., Zacharko, R.M.
Assessing internal affairs.
BBS 1982 5(3): 422-423.

Arnold, M.B.
Emotions-inferences from hypothetical hypothalamic circuits?
BBS 1982 5(3): 422.

Averill, J.R.
Emotions: Hard- or soft-wired?
BBS 1982 5(3): 423.

Clynes, M.
Specific human emotions are psychobiologic entities: Psychobiologic coherence between emotion and its dynamic expression.
BBS 1982 5(3): 424-425.

Delgado, J.M.R.
Animal and human emotionality.
BBS 1982 5(3): 425-427.

de Rivera, J.
Relating experience to the brain.
BBS 1982 5(3): 427-428.

de Sousa, R.
Introspection as the Rosetta stone: Millstone or fifth wheel?
BBS 1982 5(3): 428-429.

Fonberg, E.
Emotions are objective events.
BBS 1982 5(3): 429-430.

Globus, G.G.
Can phenomenology contribute to brain science?
BBS 1982 5(3): 430-431.

Gray, J.A.
On the classification of the emotions.
BBS 1982 5(3): 431-432.

Heath, R.G.
Panksepp’s psychobiological theory of emotions: Some substantiation.
BBS 1982 5(3): 432-433.

Izard, C.E.
From stimulus-bound emotive command systems to drive-free emotions.
BBS 1982 5(3): 433-434.

Jaynes, J.
A two-tiered theory of emotions: Affect and feeling.
BBS 1982 5(3): 434-435.

Katz, L.D.
Parting’s sweet sorrow: A pain pathway for the social sentiments?
BBS 1982 5(3): 435-436.

Klein, D.F.
Panic, separation anxiety, and endorphins.
BBS 1982 5(3): 436.

Klinger, E., Kemble, E.D.
Generality and specifics in psychobiological theory of emotions.
BBS 1982 5(3): 437-438.

Lazarus, R.S.
Psycho-biology without psychosocial significance.
BBS 1982 5(3): 438-439.

Lutz, C.
Introspection and cultural knowledge systems.
BBS 1982 5(3): 439-440.

Lyons, W.
Concerning the alleged four basic emotions.
BBS 1982 5(3): 440-441.

Morton, A.
Psychobiology needs cognitive psychology.
BBS 1982 5(3): 441-442.

Plutchik, R.
Only 4 command systems for all emotions?
BBS 1982 5(3): 442-443.

Royce, J.R.
On the complexity of emotion.
BBS 1982 5(3): 443.

Siegel, A.
On the nature of specific hard-wired brain circuits.
BBS 1982 5(3): 443-444.

Solomon, R.C.
Emotional cookbooks.
BBS 1982 5(3): 444-445.

Stocker, M.
Softening the wires of human emotion.
BBS 1982 5(3): 445-446.

Toates, F.M.
The rat as hedonist – A systems approach.
BBS 1982 5(3): 446-447.

Ursin, H.
Introspection and science: The problem of standardizing emotional nomenclature.
BBS 1982 5(3): 447-448.

Vanderwolf, C.H., Goodale, M.A.
Does introspection have a role in brain-behavior research?
BBS 1982 5(3): 448.

Zuckerman, M.
Can arousal be pleasurable?
BBS 1982 5(3): 449.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Panksepp, J.
Archaeology of mind.
BBS 1982 5(3): 449-460.

TARGET ARTICLE

Gray, J.A.
Précis of The neuropsychology of anxiety: An inquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system.
BBS 1982 5(3): 469-484.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Bohus, B.
Anxiety: Dysfunction of transmission or modulation?
BBS 1982 5(3): 484.

Crider, A., Solomon, P.R.
Inhibition, attention, and the hippocampus.
BBS 1982 5(3): 484-485.

Gabriel, M.
Homunculus in the subiculum.
BBS 1982 5(3): 485-486.

Gold, M.S., Fox, C.F.
“Antianxiety and opiates.”
BBS 1982 5(3): 486-487.

Iversen, S.D.
Integrating the literature on anxiety, memory and the hippocampus.
BBS 1982 5(3): 487-488.

James, D.T.D.
The evolution of hesitation, doubt and map-making.
BBS 1982 5(3): 488-489.

Kimble, D.P.
Putting anxiety in its place?
BBS 1982 5(3): 489.

Lyons, W.
Some questions of strategy in neuropsychological research on anxiety.
BBS 1982 5(3): 490-491.

Mason, S.T.
Noradrenaline: Attention or anxiety?
BBS 1982 5(3): 491-492.

McNaughton, N.
Gray’s Neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions
of septo-hippocampal theories.
BBS 1982 5(3): 492-493.

Nadel, L., Morris, R.
On novelty, places, and the septo-hippocampal system.
BBS 1982 5(3): 493-494.

Olton, D.S.
Functions of the septo-hippocampal system.
BBS 1982 5(3): 494-495.

Panksepp, J.
Anxiety viewed from the upper brain-stem: Though panic and fear yield trepidation, should both be called anxiety?
BBS 1982 5(3): 495-496.

Pribram, K.H., McGuinness, D.
The anatomy of anxiety?
BBS 1982 5(3): 496-498.

Rawlins, J.N.P.
The relationship between memory and anxiety.
BBS 1982 5(3): 498-499.

Revelle, W.
The dynamics of action and the neuropsychology of anxiety.
BBS 1982 5(3): 499.

Robinson, T.E., Therrien, B.A.
Does hippocampal theta tell anything about the neuropsychology of anxiety?
BBS 1982 5(3): 500-502.

Soubrié, P.
Inferring anxiety and antianxiety effects in animals.
BBS 1982 5(3): 502-503.

Ursin, H.
Substrates of anxiety: But if the starting point is wrong?
BBS 1982 5(3): 503.

Woodruff, M.L.
The septo-hippocampal system and behavior: Difficulties in finding the exit.
BBS 1982 5(3): 504.

Zuckerman, M.
Leaping up the phylogenetic scale: Perils and possibilities.
BBS 1982 5(3): 505-506.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Gray, J.A.
On mapping anxiety.
BBS 1982 5(3): 506-525.

Volume 05 – Issue 04 – December 1982

TARGET ARTICLE

Stein, R.B.
What muscle variable(s) does the nervous-system control in limb
movements?
BBS 1982 5(4): 535-541.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Abbs, J.H.
A speech-motor-system perspective on nervous-system-control variables.
BBS 1982 5(4): 541-542.

Alexander, R.M.
Servos and regulators in the control of leg muscles.
BBS 1982 5(4): 542.

Bässler, U.
The stick insect as a model for muscle control.
BBS 1982 5(4): 542-543.

Bawa, P.N.S., Dickinson, J.
Force as the controlling muscle variable in limb movement.
BBS 1982 5(4): 543.

Cruse, H.
Are position-control systems active during leg movement of walking arthropods?
BBS 1982 5(4): 543-544.

Duysens, J.
Does control of limb movement equal control of limb muscles?
BBS 1982 5(4): 544.

English, A.W.
Are whole muscles the fundamental substrate for the CNS control
of movement?
BBS 1982 5(4): 544-545.

Feldman, A.G.
Voluntary control of muscle length and tension, independently controlled variables, and invariant length-tension curves.
BBS 1982 5(4): 545-546.

Gottlieb, G.L., Agarwal, G.C.
Control theoretic concepts and motor control.
BBS 1982 5(4): 546-547.

Graham, D.
Do force-measuring sense-organs contribute to the reflex control of motor output in insects?
BBS 1982 5(4): 547.

Granit, R.
Multiple roles of muscular afferents.
BBS 1982 5(4): 547.

Harvey, N., Greer, K.
Force and stiffness: Further considerations.
BBS 1982 5(4): 547-548.

Hoffer, J.A.
Central control and reflex regulation of mechanical impedance: The basis for a unified motor control scheme.
BBS 1982 5(4): 548-549.

Hogan, N.
Moving with control: Using control theory to understand motor behavior.
BBS 1982 5(4): 550.

Houk, J.C.
Respective roles of reflex gain-control and reprogramming in adaptive motor control.
BBS 1982 5(4): 551.

Inbar, G.F.
The role of proprioceptors and the adaptive-control of limb movement.
BBS 1982 5(4): 551-552.

Ito, M.
The CNS as a multivariable control system.
BBS 1982 5(4): 552-553.

Kearney, H.E., Hunter, I.W.
Systems-analysis in the study of the motor-control system: Control theory alone is insufficient.

BBS 1982 5(4): 553-554.

Kelso, J.A.S., Saltzman, E.L.
Motor control: Which themes do we orchestrate?
BBS 1982 5(4): 554-557.

MacKay, W.A.
The motor system controls what it senses.
BBS 1982 5(4): 557.

Mortimer, J.A., Eisenberg, P.
How modest is the gain of the stretch reflex?
BBS 1982 5(4): 557-558.

Neilson, P.D.
Tonic stretch reflex during voluntary activity.
BBS 1982 5(4): 559.

Nichols, T.R.
Reflex action in the context of motor control.

BBS 1982 5(4): 559-560.

Partridge, L.D.
How was movement controlled before Newton?
BBS 1982 5(4): 561.

Pond, C.M.
The importance of connective tissue within and between muscles.
BBS 1982 5(4): 562.

Pubols, L.M.
Control of limb movement without feedback from muscle afferents.
BBS 1982 5(4): 562-563.

Roberts, T.D.M.
Movement control: Signal or strategy?
BBS 1982 5(4): 563-564.

Stark, L.
Neurological ballistic movements: Sampled data or intermittent
open-loop control.
BBS 1982 5(4): 564-566.

Stelmach, G.E., Diggles, V.A.
Motor equivalence and distributed control: Evidence for nonspecific muscle commands.
BBS 1982 5(4): 566-567.

Terzuolo, C.A., Soechting, J.F.
Reductionism cannot answer questions of movement control.
BBS 1982 5(4): 567-568.

Vilis, T.
Must the nervous-system be limited to afferent variables in the
control of limb movement?
BBS 1982 5(4): 568.

AUTHOR’S RESPONSE

Stein, R.B.
Movement control views: From diversity to unity.
BBS 1982 5(4): 568-571.

TARGET ARTICLE

Schwartz, S.
Is there a schizophrenic language?
BBS 1982 5(4): 579-588.

OPEN PEER COMMENTARY

Andreasen, N.C.
There may be a “schizophrenic language.”
BBS 1982 5(4): 588-589.

Asarnow, R.F., Watkins, J.M.
Schizophrenic thought disorder: Linguistic incompetence or information-processing impairment?
BBS 1982 5(4): 589-590.

Bannister, D.
Is there a schizophrenic condition?
BBS