Volume 03 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLE
Chomsky, N.
Rules and representations.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 1.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Andor, J.
Some remarks on the notion of competence.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 15.
Cromer, R.F.
Empirical evidence in support of non-empiricist theories of mind.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 16.
Cummins, R., Harnish,
R.M.
The language faculty and the interpretation of linguistics.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 18.
Passing the buck to biology.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 19.
Ghiselin, M.T.
Evolutionary anatomy and language.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 20.
Gottlief, G.
Elaboration of maturational and experiential contributions to the development
of rules and representations.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 21
Harman, G.
Two quibbles about analyticity and psychological reality.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 21.
Minimalism in cognition and language: rich man, poor man.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 22.
Lakoff, G.
What ever happened to deep structure?
BBS 1980 3 (1): 22.
The new organology.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 23.
Matthews, R.J.
Language learning versus grammar growth.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 25.
McCawley, J.D.
¡Tabula sí, rasa no!
BBS 1980 3 (1): 26.
Moravcsik, J.M.
Chomsky’s radical break with modern traditions.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 28.
Morton, A.
There are many modular theories of mind.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 29.
Morton, J.
Language: levels of charaterisations.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 29.
Rachlin, H.
Cross purposes.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 30.
Rollin, B.E.
Innate and a priori.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 31.
Rosenthal, D.M.
The modulatiry and maturation of
cognitive capacities.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 32.
Sampson, G.
Chomsky’s evidence against Chomsky’s theory.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 34.
Schank, R.C.
An artificial intelligence perspective on Chomsky’s view of
language.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 35.
Searle, J.R.
Rules and causation.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 37.
Sober, E.
Represetnationa and psychological reality.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 38.
Stich, S.P.
What every speaker cognizes.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 39.
Van Gulick, R.
Knowledge and learning.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 40.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Chomsky, N.
The new organology.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 42.
TARGET ARTICLE
Fodor, J.A.
Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive
psychology.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 63.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Block, N., Bromberger,
S.
States’ rights.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 73.
Charniak, E.
Some aspirin for Dasein.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 74.
Churchland, P.M.
In defense of naturalism.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 74.
Cohen, L.J.
Some defects in Fodor’s ‘computational’ theory.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 75.
Cummins, R.
Causes and representation.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 76.
Davis, L.
On the need for a computational psychology and the hope for a
naturalistic one.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 76.
Dreyfus, H.L.
Dasein’s revenge: methodological solipsism as an
unsuccessful escape strategy in psychology.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 78.
Evans, G.
Fodor flawed.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 79.
Geach, P.T.
Some remarks on representations.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 80.
Harman, G.
What is methodological solipsism?
BBS 1980 3 (1): 81.
Haugeland, J.
Formality and naturalism.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 81.
Hayes, P.
Knowing about formality.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 82.
Sensing and reference.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 83.
Joshi, A.K.
The content of a representation also depends on the procedure interpreting it.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 84.
Jusczyk, P.W., Earhard, B.
Implications of Fodor’s methodological solipsism for psychological theories.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 84.
Katz, J.J.
Fodor’s guide to cognitive psychology.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 85.
Loar, B.F.
Syntax, functional semantics, and referential semantics.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 89.
Fordor’s solipsisms: don’t
look a gift horse in the . . .
BBS 1980 3 (1): 90.
Rey, G.
The formal and the opaque.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 90.
Rosenthal, D.M.
Methodological behaviorism: a case for transparent taxonomy.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 92.
Searle, J.R.
Two objections to methodological solipsism.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 93.
Shaw, R., Turvey,
M.T.
Methodological realism.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 94.
Smart, J.J.C.
computational processes, representations and propositional attitudes.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 97.
Stich, S.P.
Paying the price for methodological solipsism.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 97.
Woodfield, A.
Methodological solipsism.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 98.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Fodor, J.A.
Methodologial solipsism: replies to commentators.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 99.
TARGET ARTICLE
Pylyshyn, Z.W.
Computation and cognition: issues in the foundations of cognitive science.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 111.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Churchland, P.S.
Neuroscience and psychology: should the labor be divided?
BBS 1980 3 (1): 133.
Churchland, P.M.
Pasticity: conceptual and neuronal.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 133.
Colby, K.M.
From computational methaphor to
consensual algorithms.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 134.
Demopoulos, W.
A remark on the completeness of the computational model of
mind.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 135.
Fortescue, M.
In defence of the armchair.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 135.
Grossberg, S.
Human and computer rules and representations are not equivalent.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 136.
Haugeland, J.
Psychology and computational architecture.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 138.
Heil, J.
Computation, cognition, and representation.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 139.
Hulse, S.H.
The reification of the mind-body problem?
BBS 1980 3 (1): 139.
Hunt, E.
The borders of cognition.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 140.
Keil, F.
Reductionism and cognitive flexibility.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 141.
Klatzky, R.L.
The exlusive visual processing mode: implications of
the architecture/algorithm distinction.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 142.
Kyburg, H.E. Jr.
Functional architecture and free will.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 143.
Miller, G.A.
Computation, consciousness and cognition.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 146.
Miller, J.R.
Cognitive penetrability: let us not forget about memory.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 146.
Criteria of cognitive impenetravility.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 146.
Pinker, S.
Explanations in theories of language and of imagery.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 147.
Powers, W.T.
Pylyshyn and perception.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 148.
Rey, G.
Penetrating the impenetrable.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 149.
Ringel, M.
Funcational architecture and model validation.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 150.
Smythe, W.E.
Computationan and symbolization.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 151.
Stich, S.P.
Computation without representation.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 152.
Weimer, W.B.
Cognition is not computation, for the reasons that computer don’t solve the
mind-body problems.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 152.
Zucker, S.W.
Functional architectures for cognition: are simple inferences possible?
BBS 1980 3 (1): 153.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Pylshyn, Z.W.
Cognitive representation and the process-architecture distinction.
BBS 1980 3 (1): 154.
Volume 03 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLE
Symons, D.
Précis: The evolution of human
sexuality.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 171.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Alcock, J.
Beyond the sociobiology of sexuality: predictive hypotheses.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 181.
Bernstien, I.S.
Motives, intentions, science, and sex.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 182.
Dewsbury, D.A.
Methods in the two sociobiologies.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 183.
Diamond, M.
The biosocial evolution of human sexuality.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 184.
Eysenck, H.J.
Sociobiology – standing on one leg.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 186.
Geis, G., Huston, T.L.
Forcible rape and human sexuality.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 184.
Ghiselin, M.T.
Is sex sufficient?
BBS 1980 3 (2): 187.
Hailman, J.P.
Fitness, function, fidelity, fornication, and feminine philandering.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 189.
Heiman, J.R.
Selecting for a sociobiological fit.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 189.
Hoffman, M.R.
An interactionist perspective on
human sexuality.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 190.
King, G.E.
Pair bonding and proximal mechanisms.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 191.
Lamb, M.E.
On the origins and implications of sex differences in human
sexuality.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 192.
The division of labor and the evolution of human sexuality.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 193.
McGrew, W.C.
The proper study of sociobiological mankind is sex.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 193.
McGuinness, D.
Male and female choice in human sexuality.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 194.
Mitchell, G.
Sex differences and intent.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 195.
Ridley, M.
Konrad Lorenz and Humpty Dumpty:
some ethology for Donald Symons.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 196.
Is science sexist?
BBS 1980 3 (2): 197.
Sade, D.S.
Human sexuality: hints for an alternative explanation.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 198.
Steklis, H.D.
Problems of comparative primate sexuality.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 199.
Tennov, D.
The clarification of proximate mechanisms.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 200.
Tompkins, L.
An (im)printed circuit
theory of sexual behavior.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 200.
Udry, J.R.
Female sexual adaptability: a consequence of the absence of natural selection
among females.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 201.
Weitz, S.
Sex differences in sexuality: what is their relevance to sex roles?
BBS 1980 3 (2): 202.
Whalen, R.E.
Evolutionary causation: how proximate is ultimate?
BBS 1980 3 (2): 202.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Symons, D.
The evolution of human sexuality revisited.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 203.
TARGET ARTICLE
McGlone, J.
Sex differences in human brain asymmetry: a critical survey.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 215.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Annett, M.
Sex differences in laterality—meaningfulness versus reliability.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 227.
Beatty, W.W.
Sex differences in brain asymmetry: are there rodent models?
BBS 1980 3 (2): 228.
Berner, A.
Sex differences: asymmetry in dermatoglyphics and
brain.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 228.
Blinkov, S.
Sex differences, asymmetry, and variability.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 229.
Bradshaw, J.L.
Sex and side: a doulb dichotomy interacts.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 229.
Bryden, M.P.
Sex differences in brain organization: different brains of different
strategies?
BBS 1980 3 (2): 230.
Sex differences in electrophysiological correlates of asymmetric cerebral
function.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 231.
Denenberg, V.H.
Some principles for interpreting laterality differences.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 232.
Diamond, M.C.
New data supporting cortical asymmetry differences in males
and females.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 233.
Fairweather, H.
Sex differences in brain organization.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 234.
Flor-Henry, P.
Evolutionary and clinical aspects of lateralized sex differences.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 235.
Sex differences in brain asymmetry of the rodent.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 236.
Harris, L.J.
Lateralized sex differences: substrates and significance.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 236.
Hier, D.B., Kaplan, J.
Are sex differences in cerebral organization clinically significant?
BBS 1980 3 (2): 238.
Hoyenga, K.B.
The puzzle of a sexually dimorphic brain.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 239.
Ingle, D.
Animal models for lateralized sex differences.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 240.
Kimura, D.
Sex differences in intrahemispheric organization of
speech.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 240.
Kinsbourne, M.
If sex differences in brain lateralization exist, they have yet to be
discovered.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 241.
Lansdell, H.
Man’s skewed brain: factors and interests.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 242.
Sex differences in human brain morphology.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 242.
Martin, L.J.
Inadequate criteria for hypothesis testing in cerebral asymmetry research.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 243.
McGee, M.G.
The effect of brain asymmetry on cognitive functions depends upon what ability, for which sex, at what point
in development.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 243.
McGuinness, D.
Strategies, demands, and lateralized sex differences.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 244.
Morgan, M.J.
Influences of sex on variation in human brain asymmetry.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 244.
Nottebohm, F.
A continuum of sexes bedevils the search for sexual differences?
BBS 1980 3 (2): 245.
Ray, W.J., Newcombe,
N.
Interpreting sex differences in lateralization.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 246.
Rebert, C.S.
Sex differences in complex visuomotor coordination.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 246.
Sasanuma, S.
Do Japanese show sex differences in brain asymmetry? Supplementary
findings.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 247.
Sex-related differences in functional human brian
asymmetry: verbal function – no; spatial function – maybe.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 248.
Vandenberg, S.G.
Age effects in neurometrics.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 249.
Waber, D.P.
What is the significance of sex differences in performance asymmetries?
BBS 1980 3 (2): 249.
Wolff, P.H.
A differences that may make no difference.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 250.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
McGlone, J.
Sex differences in brain asymmetry survive peer commentary!
BBS 1980 3 (2): 251.
TARGET ARTICLE
deCantazaro, D.
Human suicide: a biological perspective.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 265.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Anisman, H.
Depression and suicide: stress as a precipitating factor.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 272.
Biological variation and suicide.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 273.
Carr, E.G.
Suicide: comments on deCatanzaro’s diathesis-stress
model.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 273.
Dawkins, R.
Domesticity, senescence, and suicide.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 274.
Douglas, J.D.
Baechler’s theory of suicide.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 275.
Duke, M.P.
Feasting on the sociobiology of suicide: somehow I still feel hungry . . .
BBS 1980 3 (2): 276.
Farber, M.L.
Suicide as natural selection.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 277.
Frieden, G.
Self-destructive behavior: suicide, shocks and worms.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 277.
Do nonhuman animals commit suicide?
BBS 1980 3 (2): 278.
Hankoff, L.D., Turner, W.J.
A nontheory of suicide.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 279.
Harmatz, M.G.
The biological perspective on suicide: to be or not to be – is that
sociobiology?
BBS 1980 3 (2): 280.
Lester, D.
The categorization of suicide.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 281.
Wenz, F.V.
Heredity, environment, and culture in suicide.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 281.
Wetzel, R.D.
Suicide: the need for a cognitive perspective.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 282.
Suicide, beanbag genetics, and pleiotropy.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 283.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
deCatanzaro, D.
Human suicide: toward a diathesis-stress hypothesis.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 283.
TARGET ARTICLE
Bolles, R.C., Faneslow, M.S.
A perceptual-defensive-recuperative model of fear and pain.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 291.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Motivational systems: fear or defense? pain or
recuperation?
BBS 1980 3 (2): 301.
Appley, M.H.
Stress and arousal in pain perception.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 301.
Bindra, D.
How are defensive and recuperative actions produced?
BBS 1980 3 (2): 302.
PDR theory – a psychological approach to biological questions.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 302.
Bowsher, D.
Dual mechanism of pain.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 303.
The explanation of motivation and the motivation of
explanation.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 304.
Chapman, C.R., Gagliardi,
G.J.
Clinical implications of Bolles & Fanselow’s pain/fear model.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 305.
Dubner, R.
Naloxone produces a fear and pain model.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 306.
Eichelman, B.
Fear and pain: semantic, biochemical and clinical reflections.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 306.
Eysenck, H.J.
Fear, pain, and arousal.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 307.
Fields, H.L.
Pain is sufficient to activate the endorphin-mediated analgesia system.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 308.
Fonberg, E.
Pain and fear are different motivations.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 308.
Gray, J.A.
On the difference between pain and fear.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 310.
Greenberg, G.
Premature theorizing is not always parsimonious.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 310.
Hayes, R.L.
The multiplicity of physiological and behavioral variables
modulating pain responses.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 311.
Hendersen, R.W.
Motivation and function.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 311.
Jacquet, Y.F.
B-endorphin and ACTH: inhibitory and excitatory neurohormones
of pain and fear?
BBS 1980 3 (2): 312.
Melzack, R.
Pain theory: exceptions to the rule.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 313.
Miczek, K.A.
The neurochemistry of defensive behavior and fear.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 313.
Vierck, C.J., Cooper, B.Y.
Contextual determinants of pain reactions.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 314.
Yaksh, T.L.
Role of the intrinsic modulatory systems in somesthesis.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 315.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Bolles, R.C., Faneslow, M.S.
PDR – a multi-level model of fear and pain.
BBS 1980 3 (2): 315.
Volume 03 – Issue
TARGET ARTICLE
Jensen, A.R.
Précis of Bias in mental testing.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 325.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Brace, C.L.
Social bias in mental testing.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 333.
Breland, H.M.
Population validity and admissions decisions.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 334.
Brody, N., Brody, E.B.
Differential construct validity.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 335.
Cattell, R.B.
”They talk of some strict testing of us – Pish.”
BBS 1980 3 (3): 336.
Clarke, A.M.
Unbiased tests and biased people.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 337.
Dorfman, D.D.
Test bias: What did Yale, Harvard, Rolls-Royce, and a black have in common in
1917.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 339.
Eckberg, D.L.
The problem of hierarchical thought in the work of Arthur Jensen.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 340.
Eckland, B.K.
Competent teachers and competent students.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 341.
Economos, J.
Bias cuts deeper than scores.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 342.
Gordon, R.A.
Implications of valid (and stubborn) IQ differences: An unstatesmanlike
view.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 343.
Green, D.R.
Achievement tst bias: do the statistical models fit
reality?
BBS 1980 3 (3): 345.
Harrington, G.M.
Criteria of test bias: do the statistical models fit reality.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 345.
Havender, W.R.
Individual versus collective social justice.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 345.
Hirsch, J., Beeman,
M., Tully, T.P.
Compensatory education has succeeded.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 346.
Humphreys, L.G.
Intelligence testing: the importance of a difference should be evaluated
independently of its causes.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 347.
Kempthorne, O., Wolins, L.
Controversies surrounding mental testing.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 348.
Kline, P.
Test bias and prob lems in corss-cultural testing.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 349.
Longstreth, L.E.
The definitive work on mental test bias.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 350.
Osborne, R.T.
The spearman-Jensen hypothesis.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 351.
Reynolds, C.R.
In support of Bias in Mental Testing and scientific inquiry.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 352.
Rosenthal, R.
Error and bias in the selection of data.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 352.
Sternberg, R.J.
Intelligence and test bias: Art and science.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 353.
Tests are not to blame.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 354.
Vandenberg, S.G.
An existence proof for intelligence?
BBS 1980 3 (3): 355.
Antitest views are refuted.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 356.
Vetta, A.
Correlation, regression and biased science.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 357.
Vogel, F.
Genetic influence on IQ.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 358.
Wahlsten, D.
Race, the heritability of IQ, and the intellectual scale of nature.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 358.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Jensen, A.R.
Correctin the bias against mental testing: A
preponderance of peer agreement.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 359.
TARGET ARTICLE
Ullman, S.
Against direct perception.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 373.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Braddick, O.J.
Direct perception: an opponent and a precursor of computational theories.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 381.
Bridgeman, B.
Direct perception and a call for primary perception.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 382.
Doner, J.F., Lappin,
J.S.
The function and process of perception.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 382.
Epstein, W.
Direct perception or mediated perception: a comparison of rival viewpoints.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 384.
Grossberg, S.
Direct perception or adaptive resonance?
BBS 1980 3 (3): 385.
Gyr, J.W.
Visual perception is underdetermined by stimulation.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 386.
Hayes-Roth, F.
Mediating the so-called immediate processes of perception.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 386.
Hinton, G.E.
Inferring the meaning of direct perception.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 387.
Johansson, G., von Hofsten,
C., Jansson, G.
Direct perception and perceptual processes.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 388.
Jones, R.K., Pick, A.D.
On the nature of information in behalf of direct perception.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 388.
Keyser, S.J., Pinker, S.
Direct vs. representational view of cognition: A parallel between vision and
phonology.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 389.
Koenderink, J.J.
Why argue about direct perception?
BBS 1980 3 (3): 390.
Loftus, G.R., Loftus, E.F.
Visual perception: the shifing domain of discourse.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 391.
Mace, W.M.
Perceptual activity and direct perception.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 392.
Mackworth, A.K.
Are mediating representations the ghosts in the machine?
BBS 1980 3 (3): 393.
Prazdny, K.
How wrong is Gibson?
BBS 1980 3 (3): 394.
Prindle, S.S., Carello, C., Turvey, M.T.
Animal-environment mutuality and direct perception.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 395.
Reed, E.S.
Information pickup is the activity of perceiving.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 397.
Rock,
Difficulties with a direct theory of perception.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 398.
Runeson, S.
There is more to psychological meaningfulness than computation and
representation.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 399.
Shaw, R., Todd, J.
Abstract machine theory and direct perception.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 400.
Sloman, A.
What kind of indirect process is visual perception?
BBS 1980 3 (3): 401.
von Fieandt, K.
In defense of invariances and
higher-order stimuli.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 404.
Weimer, W.B.
Logical atomism and computation do not refute Gibson.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 405.
Welker, W.
Percepts, intervening variables, and neural mechanisms.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 405.
Zucker, S.W.
The computational/representational paradigm as normal science: further support.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 406.
Zuckerman, C.B.
What are the contributions of the direct perception approach?
BBS 1980 3 (3): 407.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Ullman, S.
Perception, information, and computation.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 408.
TARGET ARTICLE
Searle, J.R.
Minds, brains, and programs.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 417.
OPEN PEER COMMENTARY
Abelson, R.P.
Searle’s argument is just as set of Chinese symbols.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 424.
Block, N.
What intuitions about homunculi don’t show?
BBS 1980 3 (3): 425.
Bridgeman, B.
Brains + programs = minds.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 427.
Danto, A.C.
The use and mention of terms and the simulation of linguistic
understanding.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 428.
Dennett, D.
The milk of human intentionality.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 428.
Eccles, J.C.
A dualist-interactionist
perspective.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 430.
Fodor, J.A.
Searle on what only brains can do.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 431.
Haugeland, J.
Programs, causal powers, and intentionality.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 432.
Hofstadter, D.R.
Reductionism and religion.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 433.
Libet, B.
Mental phenomena and behavior.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 434.
Lycan, W.G.
The functionalist reply (
BBS 1980 3 (3): 434.
McCarthy, J.
Beliefs, machines, and theories.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 435.
Artificial intelligence—the real thing?
BBS 1980 3 (3): 435.
Maxwell, G.
Intentionality: Hardware, not software.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 437.
Menzel, E.W.
Is the pen mightier than the computer?
BBS 1980 3 (3): 438.
Minsky, M.
Decentralized minds.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 439.
Natsoulas, T.
The primary source of intentionality.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 440.
Puccetti, R.
The chess room: further demythologizing of strong AI.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 441.
Pylyshyn, Z.W.
The “causal power” of machines.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 442.
Rachlin, H.
The behaviorist reply (Stony Brook).
BBS 1980 3 (3): 444.
Ringle, M.
Mysticism as a philosophy of artificial intelligence.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 444.
Rorty, R.
Searle and the special powers of the brain.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 445.
Schank, R.C.
Understanding Searle.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 446.
Sloman, A., Croucher, M.
How to turn an information processor into an understander.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 447.
Smythe, W.E.
Simulation games.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 448.
Walter, D.O.
The thermostat and the philosophy professor.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 449.
Wilensky, R.
Computers, cognition and philosophy.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 449.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Searle, J.
Intrinsic intentionality.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 450.
CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Eysenck, H.J.
The conditioning model of neurosis.
BBS 1979 2 (2): 155-99.
Ellis, A.
Some cognitive additions to Eysenck’s “The conditioning
model of neurosis.”
BBS 1980 3 (3): 459.
Freides, D.
Atavisms in psychopathological theory.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 460.
Kondas, O.
Human learning is more complex and fears are more influenced by ontogeny.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 461.
Pinkava, V.A.
A multivalued logical net modeling conditioning.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 461.
Pitman, R.K.
The conditioning model of neurosis: promise and limitations.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 462.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Eysenck, H.J.
Conditioning, cognition, and neurosis.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 463.
CONTINUING COMMENTARY on Toates, F.M.
Homeostasis and drinking.
BBS 1979 2 (1): 95-136.
Bourbon, W.T.
Anticipatory regulation: a raincoat does not feedforward
make.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 465.
Sinclair, J.D.
Compensatory behaviors and the “rest principle.”
BBS 1980 3 (3): 466.
AUTHOR’S RESPONSE
Toates, F.M.
The modeling of incentive motivation processes.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 466.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Rosenthal, R.,
Rubin, D.B.
Interpersonal
expectancy effects: the first 345 studies.
BBS 1978 1 (3): 377-415.
Clarke, A.M.
The interpersonal approach to expectancy effects: the experimenter and the
subjects.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 469.
Darley, J.M.
Interpersonal expectancy effects: a future research agenda.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 469.
Masling, J.
On statistical stability and significance.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 470.
Peeters, G.
Social-cognitive factors in expectancy effect: why apples and oranges are
fruits.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 471.
Experimenter expectancy, evaluation apprehension, and the diffusion of
methodological angst.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 472.
Snyder, C.R.
Applying the self-fulfilling prophecy: some thoughts on how the prophet forms
can sustains expectations.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 474.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSE
Rosenthal, R, Rubin, D.B.
Further issues in summarizing 345 studies of interpersonal
expectancy effects.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 475.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Corballis,
M.C., Morgan, M.J.
On
the biological basis of human laterality: I. Evidence for a maturational
left-right gradient and II. The mechanisms of inheritance.
BBS 1978 1 (2): 261-336.
Hiscock, M., Kinsbourne,
M.
Is there a maturational left-right gradient for brain functions?
BBS 1980 3 (3): 477.
Rife, D.C.
Laterality differences in twins.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 477.
von Kraft, A.
On the problem of the origin of asymmetric organs and human
laterality.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 478.
AUTHORS’ RESPONSES
Corballis, M.C.
Human laterality: the other cheek.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 479.
Morgan, M.J.
On the problem of the origin of asymmetric organs and human laterality: a reply
to von Kraft.
BBS 1980 3 (3): 480.
Volume 03 – Issue
TARGET
ARTICLE
Lynch,
J.C.
The functional organization of posterior parietal
association cortex.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 485.
OPEN
PEER COMMENTARY
Bisiach, E.
The compass of the parietal “command” system.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 499.
Butter, C.M.
Posterior
parietal cortex: Unity or independence of functions?
BBS 1980 3 (4): 500.
Chow,
K.L.
Inner structure of cortical columns.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 500.
Deuel,
R.K.
The parietal association fields and behavior.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 501.
Eidelberg, E.
Is
the parietal lobe guilty of association?
BBS 1980 3 (4): 501.
Ettlinger, G.
How
can we resolve the enigma of parietal cortex?
BBS 1980 3 (4): 502.
Glickstein, M.
Posterior parietal cortex and visual control of the
hand.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 503.
The significance of enhanced visual responses in
posterior parietal cortex.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 503.
Heilman,
K.M., Watson, R.T., Valenstein, E., Bowers, D.
Neglect
in man: Hemispheric asymmetries and hemispatial
neglect.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 505.
Hyvärinen, J.
Sensorimotor interaction in parietal
association cortext.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 506.
Jones, E.G.
Parietal
cortex: Columns, connectivity, and convergence.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 507.
Latto,
R.
Problems in comparing the behavioural
effects of parietal cortex lesions in man and monkey and of integrating these
with electrophysiological data.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 508.
Global and local processing in the primate brain.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 509.
Mesulam, M.-M.
An
anatomical basis for the functional specialization of the parietal lobe in
directed attention.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 510-511.
Pandya,
D.N., Sletzer, B.
Cortical connections and the functional
organization of posterior parietal cortex.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 511.
Roland,
P.E.
The posterior parietal association cortex in man.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 513.
Rolls, E.T., Perrett, D.,
Thorpe, S.J.
The influence of motivation on the responses of
neurons in the posterior parietal association cortex.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 514.
Sakata, H.
Reapprisal of the corollary discharge hypothesis.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 515.
Schlag,
J.
Are
parietal saccade neurons sensory or motor? Is the question worth asking?
BBS 1980 3 (4): 515.
Stein,
J.
A
command or association function for the posterior
parietal cortex?
BBS 1980 3 (4): 516.
Thomas,
R.K.
Attention,
motivation and emotion: Entia non sunt
multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 517.
Troost,
B.T.
Clinical disorders of ocular motor control.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 518.
Weinstein
E.A.
Clinical
features of hemi-inattention.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 518.
Mountcastle, V.B., Motter, B.C., Andersen, R.A.
Some
further observations on the functional properties of neurons in the parietal
lobe of the waking monkey.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 520.
AUTHOR’S
RESPONSE
Lynch,
J.C.
Parietal
function: Different aspects of the unified whole.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 523.
TARGET
ARTICLE
Selverston, A.I.
Are
central pattern generators understandable?
BBS 1980 3 (4): 535-540.
Ayers, J.
Do
different behaviors require different central pattern generators.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 540.
Block,
G.D.
Snake
oil and the modeling process in neurobiology.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 541-542.
Calabrese,
R.L.
Invertebrate
central pattern generators: modeling and complexity.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 542-543.
Cohen,
A.H.
A
new generation of experimental and theoretical methods is needed in
neurobiology.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 543.
Neurophilosophical reflections on central nervous
pattern generators.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 543-544.
Delcomyn, F.
Even
“simple” systems are more complex than we think.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 544-545.
Fentress,
J.C.
Bursting networks.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 545-546.
Friesen,
W.O.
Models, modeling and the leech swimming rhythm.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 546.
Gerstein,
G.L.
Models and multineuron
recordings.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 546-547.
Getting,
P.A.
Central
pattern generators can be understood.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 547.
Gillette,
R.
Adaptive significance, redundancy and variance in
central pattern generators.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 547-548.
Goldberg,
L.J.
The failure of current strategies in the study of
central pattern generators.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 548.
Grillner, S.
Can
mammalian pattern generators be understood?
BBS 1980 3 (4): 549.
Harth, E.
Must
neural mechanisms be Newtonian?
BBS 1980 3 (4): 550-551.
Hartline, D.K.
Roles for models in understanding neural networks.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 551-552.
Hoyle,
G.
Expectation and achievement in analysis of motor
program generation.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 552-553.
Huber,
F.
Central
pattern generators (CPGs) from the view point of a
behavioral physiologist.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 553-554.
Kaneko,
C.R.S.
A practical approach to understanding central
program generators.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 554.
Larimer,
J.L., Thompson, W.
Pessimism, models, and episodic behavior.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 554-555.
Lent, C.M.
On neuronal nihilism.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 555.
Loeb,
G.E., Marks, W.B.
Epistemology and heuristics in neural network
research.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 556-557.
Luco,
J.V.
Central pattern generators and sensory input.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 557.
Merickel, M.
Single-cell
versus network properties and the use of models
BBS 1980 3 (4): 557-558.
Moffett, S.
The comparative approach to understanding central
pattern generators.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 558-559.
Pentreath, V.W.
At
what level will pattern generators be understood?
BBS 1980 3 (4): 559.
Pinsker, H.M.
Neuroethological analysis of central pattern
generators.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 559-560.
Central pattern generators and neuroethology.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 560-561.
Rowell,
H.F.
Philosophy
leads to pessimism, research leads to understanding.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 561-562.
Székely,
G.
Particulars and principles of nervous activity.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 562.
Weeks, J.C.
The
implications of recent experimental results for the validity of modeling
studies of the leech swim central pattern generator.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 562-563.
Wendler,
G.
On the history and value of the central pattern
generator concept.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 563.
Wiens,
T.J.
Graded
transmission, mechanistic multiplicity and modeling.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 563-564.
Willows, A.O.D.
Central
pattern generator analysis is alive and well.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 564-565.
AUTHOR’S
RESPONSE
Selverston, A.I.
Towards understanding central pattern generators.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 565-567.
TARGET
ARTICLE
Sternberg,
R.J.
Sketch of a componential subtheory
of human intelligence.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 573-584.
OPEN
PEER COMMENTARY
Cultural
universality of any theory of human intelligence remains an open question.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 584-585.
Borkowski, J.G.
On the nature and measurement of metacomponents.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 585.
Brody, N.
Components to the rescue.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 586.
Butterfield,
E.C.
On
sternbergs translation of g
into metacomponents and questions of parsimony.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 586-587.
Carroll,
J.B.
Components
and factors: complementary “units” of analysis?
BBS 1980 3 (4): 587-588.
Collins, A.
A cognitive scientist view of intelligence.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 588-589.
Detterman, D.K.
Understand
cognitive components before postulating metacomponents.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 589.
Frederiksen, J.R.
A Thurstonian’s reaction
to a componential theory of intelligence.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 590-591.
Components versus factors.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 591-592.
Hunt, E.
The language of componential analysis.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 592-595.
Keating,
D.P.
Sternberg
sketchy theory: defining details desired.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 595-596.
Kline,
P.
Factors
or processes in intelligence.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 596-597.
Lansdell, H.
Intelligence:
Toward a modern sketch of a good g.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 597.
MacLeod,
C.M.
Discovering and training the components of
intelligence.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 597-598.
Pellegrino,
J.W.
Three perspectives on intelligence.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 598-599.
Royce,
J.R.
On theory and metatheory,
and normal and revolutionary science.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 599.
AUTHOR’S
RESPONSE
Sternberg,
R.J.
Claims,
counterclaims, and components: A countercritique of
componential analysis.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 599-611.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Premack,
D., Woodruff, G.
Does
the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?
BBS 1978 1: 515-26.
CONTINUING COMMENTARY on
Prospects for a cognitive ethology.
BBS 1978 1: 527-38.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S., Rumbaugh, D.M., Boysen, S.
Linguistically
mediated tool use and exchange by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
BBS 1978 1: 539-54.
Lindauer, M.
Cognition and consciousness - their evolutionary
gradients.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 615-616.
Schwartz,
R.
How
rich a theory of mind?
BBS 1980 3 (4): 617-618.
Shanon,
B.
The significance of self-awareness.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 618.
AUTHORS’
RESPONSES
What
do animals think?
BBS 1980 3 (4): 619-620.
Savage-Rumbaugh, S., Scanlon,
J.L., Rumbaugh, D.M.
Communicative intentionality in the chimpanzee.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 620-622.
CONTINUING
COMMENTARY on Eibl-Eibesfeldt,
I.
Human
ethology: concepts and implications for the sciences
of man.
BBS 1979 2: 1-57.
Bekoff,
M.
Human ethology,
biological determinism, directive genes, and trees.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 623-624.
Bubenik,
A.B.
On demographic factors and neurohormonal
substrates.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 624-625.
Harrington,
G.M.
Locus
of causation: analysis of ethological similarities.
BBS 1980 3 (4): 625-626.
Markl,
H.S.
How
much can the ethological approach contribute to an understanding of human behavior?
BBS 1980 3 (4): 626-627.
Pitman,
R.K.